Comments: 59
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-05 00:07:37 +0000 UTC]
I mean the size of the building is rather big compared to the churches you see here.Ah ok ofcourse i heard about the mormons but i dident know that other name
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-05 10:26:30 +0000 UTC]
Ah i dident even know we had these at all.Intresting dident know there were mormons in germany.
Ah i dont know what to think about that but i respect everyones belives and everyone should have the faith that he or she likes
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-07 00:26:48 +0000 UTC]
Hm im not sure what i think about missionaries its sure ok to tell others about there faith and why they like it but its not right to try to make others believe in it.Everyone should believe what he or she thinks its right for them and if they belive in nothing or something totaly else its still ok.
And im not sure if any church has the whole truth.
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-07 02:06:23 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I understand that's a good position, to not try to impose it on others, though we try to educate our missionaries to convert others by letting them make their own decision. Even children who have grown up in LDS families, we encourage them to gain their own testimony, to learn for themselves whether or not it's the true church.
And yes, we don't claim to know EVERYTHING, as there will be mysteries of God. Otherwise, where would we need faith, to trust in Him? But we believe we have the fully restored gospel, just as Christ set forth for us to follow in the New Testament.
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-09 02:48:29 +0000 UTC]
Indeed. Though that's something a bit unique to the LDS, is that even though we understand that we, as a people, aren't perfect, we believe our church is, because God is perfect, and it's His church. So that should make sense, right? We're all just striving to be like God, by following Christ the best we can. People aren't perfect though (if we were, we wouldn't have such a need for the Atonement and sacrifice of Christ), so I don't think a church as a whole should be judged by some one follower's mistakes.
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-09 10:56:02 +0000 UTC]
Its great to believe in something like this and i dont want you to criticize for that but i dont a church is perfect because god is perfect.
Sure thats a good point and there are people that do bad things in every church.What do you think about the seperation of church and state ?
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-10 00:04:37 +0000 UTC]
Hehe good question i think there some kind of god that made (im not sure if made is the right word) all the things but im not sure if he or she or whatever realy made the humans.
I asked about it because i noticed some churches try to indfluence the goverment and the goverment also trys to influence the churches in some way in the us.
There two mormons running ? i know that romney is mormon but who is the other one ?
Thats well said
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-10 00:53:19 +0000 UTC]
Its a own theorie officialy im catholic but im not realy happy with this faith for various reasons.
Ah ok i thought about the abortion discusion and this contraception madate thing.I think goverment shouldent outlaw it because it depends on the faith if you are against or not and should be the decision of the people involved.The same for the contraception thing it depends on the faith to the goverment should make no mandate for it.
Ah ok i dident know about huntsmann and i dont care who the repulicans pick anyway but i hope it wont be santorum
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-10 09:29:49 +0000 UTC]
Its because its to conservative and also because of the recent child molestation scandal.
Hm i think its for the mother to decide.
Yes i agree im not even sure if the goverment pays for it here and we have a totaly different health system
He is and he is dangerous for the Us
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-12 03:34:11 +0000 UTC]
Ah, yes, I think I've heard a bit about the scandal... Hah, if you think Catholics are conservative, you'd probably think Mormons are just a step away from Amish! ;D we believe our bodies are gifts from God, so we keep them clean from alcohol, drugs, and tattoos, wearing clothes to cover our shoulders and knees. We believe in abstinence unless bound by marriage, and though you may have heard otherwise, we are not polygamists.
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-12 10:28:52 +0000 UTC]
Yeah and they tried everything to cover it up instead of uncovering it the catholic church has lost all moral authority with that.
Hm i think Amish are far more conservative than Mormons atleast mormons are not anti science.And i respect the other things even when i dont agree with them
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-15 05:12:23 +0000 UTC]
Hah, sorry, I should try to use less complex words...
Ah, I actually have a different opinion on payed pastors, because I think that turns it more into a business. When bishops are called, they never feel ready, but through God's help, they're able to accomplish great things. Plus, I think it shows their dedication and love of the church more, through their service, as a volunteer. But yes, bishops aren't called unless they're married. I think they need the support.
Yeah, you might have heard of the Twilight series? They were written by an LDS author, who graduated from BYU in the English department. Unfortunately, everyone in the department now really doesn't like the Twilight books and we kind of shun them. They're way dirty for my taste.
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-16 03:20:47 +0000 UTC]
I thought that it was only monks and nuns that couldn't date or marry, and they chose that calling for themselves? Because that doesn't make sense to me, if you can't marry then you can't have kids, and without future generations the church would dwindle and die. Sure, that's where missionary work is supposed to come in, but that wouldn't be enough.
Like, the Quakers (or is it the Shakers?) - they're a group like the Amish - they believe in abstinence even after marriage and they've dwindled down to only a dozen or so.
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-16 11:46:27 +0000 UTC]
The rule that catholic priests are not allowed to date and marry is centuries old and they did it for finacial reasons even when they say they did it because they wanted the priests to focus on god.
It makes no sense at all i dont know why they dont change maybe they dont to admit that it is wrong to have this rule.
I know which group you mean i agree this could happen to this church if they continue like this
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-17 18:19:45 +0000 UTC]
Really? I thought it was because they were trying to replicate the holiness of the Virgin Mary (which also didn't make sense to me, since she and Joseph had several kids - including the apostle James, being Christ's half-brother).
Hmm, I can't see the Catholic church dwindling, because this rule is centuries old, but it hasn't seemed to effect its population yet as most members don't follow it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Eagle86 In reply to A-RaeDArc [2012-03-17 18:25:39 +0000 UTC]
Ofcialy they do it because of this reasons but in reality they did because the church wanted the money of the priests families when they died.
Hm i think if the church doesent change atleast the "zΓΆlibat" has to go and they should allow women as priests it will dwindle atleast in europe.
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-17 22:57:24 +0000 UTC]
Huh, interesting. See, I think that's another reason why I don't think bishops and church leaders should be paid. Tithing money goes to the church as a whole to build temples, which serves the people in return, or to help families who are struggling financially.
Yeah, I think "celibacy" (as we say it in English) only causes more sexual temptation. We were commanded to "multiply and replenish the earth." This act of creation is a sacred union between a man and woman, and should only be performed under the bonds of marriage.
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-20 05:48:12 +0000 UTC]
I heard 'indulgences' started out as just another way for the church to get money from the people. Sorry, but I don't agree with those, as I see them as a way to "buy your way into Heaven."
Hah, "idiot" isn't a kind word, but it's not a swear word either. It's appropriate when describing someone you might respect for their authority, but don't agree with.
Yes, we like to refer to God as our "Father in Heaven," because we feel a special closeness to His love for us, and as we're all one eternal family, He is our Eternal Father.
π: 0 β©: 1
A-RaeDArc In reply to Eagle86 [2012-03-24 17:41:21 +0000 UTC]
Well, to explain the basis of what we believe, I'd have to explain the story of Joseph Smith (our first Prophet of the latter-days). In 1830, there was a lot of religious reformation and Joseph Smith was 14, wondering which church to join. He was lead to James 1:5 "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him." He decided to go into the woods one day and pray, but as he began to pray aloud, he was seized by a power and darkness that sought to bind his tongue. He called upon God for deliverance and a bright light shone from above him, releasing him from the dark power. The light fell on him and he saw two personages; one speaking of the other, saying "Joseph, this is My Beloved Son, Hear Him." He remembered to ask the personages which church he should join, and was told to join none of them. Joseph Smith later brought forth the Book of Mormon and translated it through the power of God, which lead to the organization of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Now, I can imagine, you probably think I'm rather gullible for believing such a story, but I've read the Book of Mormon, and I believe it to be the word of God, just as much as the Bible. No good thing comes from Satan, so I'll let you judge for yourself if these words are good or for deception:
"And now, behold, I will testify unto you of myself that these things are true. Behold, I say unto that I do know that Christ shall come among the children of men, to take upon him the transgressions of his people, and that he shall atone for the sins of the world; for the Lord God hath spoken it." ~Alma 34:8 (74BC).
π: 0 β©: 0
Rjet33 [2011-06-07 15:39:41 +0000 UTC]
It's a beautiful capture!
π: 0 β©: 0
PrissyKissy [2011-05-05 01:28:19 +0000 UTC]
This is gorgeous! I love the angle you used, so that we can see just how tall the temple is!
π: 0 β©: 1
Vesinia [2011-02-22 17:11:38 +0000 UTC]
This is a very lovely photo! The colors are beautiful against the white of the temple. They make each other stand out!
π: 0 β©: 1
Vesinia In reply to A-RaeDArc [2011-02-24 17:43:43 +0000 UTC]
I am not really any particular branch of anything. I am kind of eclectic in my beliefs and it just works for me. I do try to embrace people for who they are and I can appreciate all kinds of beauty. This photo is beautiful!
π: 0 β©: 1
wulfdragyn [2011-01-27 17:08:57 +0000 UTC]
Very nice shot!
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>