thomismyart In reply to nothinspecial [2006-03-18 21:11:02 +0000 UTC]

...are you being a smart ass? that sure was a long response to a simple question...you could have just sed: 'yeh, i like radiohead.' besides, im too lazy to "refer" to things and look at words to find answers.

hey...dya like radiohead?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nothinspecial In reply to thomismyart [2006-03-18 21:45:59 +0000 UTC]

yeh, i like radiohead.

the song by the talking heads as well as the band named after it.
i've seen them three times, most recently at Coachella two years ago.
actually, "like" doesn't really cover it.
i LOVE radiohead.
and yes, i was being a smartass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomismyart In reply to nothinspecial [2006-03-19 03:51:35 +0000 UTC]

well...ill let you get away with the smartassedness just because you love radiohead. we fans are few and far apart.we're rare you know? i LOVE radiohead as well, for about 11 years. how bout you? or did i over look that information in your journal as well? 👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nothinspecial In reply to thomismyart [2006-03-21 10:52:04 +0000 UTC]

i'm pretty sure it's been more than eleven years...what year did pablo honey come out?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

thomismyart In reply to nothinspecial [2006-03-25 22:56:09 +0000 UTC]

it came out i think two yrs before it did in america. i was seven when creep was released as a single. im turning 18, so 11-12 years. but theyve been radiohead years before that. since they were children and called on a friday. they probably looked funny in school boy uniforms w/ guitars. thom supposedly sang on a microphone tied to a broom. funny.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Drumboy In reply to nothinspecial [2006-03-25 18:11:47 +0000 UTC]

Feburary 22nd, 1993 ^^ (April 20th in the US)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomismyart In reply to 5crew [2006-03-14 05:15:27 +0000 UTC]

oh, thanks! i forgot all about that. ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomismyart In reply to jane-sagt [2006-03-07 02:11:27 +0000 UTC]

r we? thats cool. i should go to your page and see wuts up with our similarities. ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomismyart In reply to NosebleedBoy [2006-03-07 04:03:16 +0000 UTC]

yep, no problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomismyart In reply to AngelsThinkOfYou [2006-03-04 18:43:41 +0000 UTC]

then your extremely welcome here! the bigger the fan the better. have any fanfiction? or drawings? i post them on my site and give that person credit. or atleast i would if someone would send me some shit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomismyart In reply to CrimsonStigmata2501 [2006-03-04 18:41:49 +0000 UTC]

yes! just look at my friend list. hell, welcome to the thomrocks club, i just made it up...your the first member, but to join you must mail me your left nut, or ovary, are you a boy or a girl?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CrimsonStigmata2501 In reply to thomismyart [2006-03-06 09:48:29 +0000 UTC]

lol.. im a girl!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomismyart In reply to CrimsonStigmata2501 [2006-03-06 19:27:21 +0000 UTC]

ok. why is kurt cobain your avatar?!? i hate that bitch! he is a loser... now thom! thats a real man...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomismyart In reply to Ismiruga [2006-03-04 15:59:56 +0000 UTC]

why spank you! your nice. i wont curse your family! your safe. 'D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomismyart In reply to bunsushi [2006-03-04 16:01:48 +0000 UTC]

its very magnetive. but do two thom yorke avatars cause an opposing force or an attracting force? wouldn't i need to get a jonny or colin avatar for them to stick? (i dunno wut the hell im saying i just woke up...)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bunsushi In reply to thomismyart [2006-03-04 17:54:35 +0000 UTC]

Hmm...

You might assume that a + + relationship might be repulsive, and even to deviate from chemical terms -- Thom might be pretty freaked out to see a clone of his (aka other avatar), thus a force of opposition.

However, it is essential to take into consideration the values of each avatar. Yours is animated and black and whiter, whereas mine is stationary and colored. Therefore, it is safe to assume that both avatars have different orbitals (we'll say you're a d-block, you're so complex). Upon further examination, we can determine if our avatars are reagents or simple elements. If reagents, it would be a x+ x- relationship, and therefore attracting.


And that is what you call cramming for the High Chem exam for last week's term tests!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomismyart In reply to bunsushi [2006-03-04 18:35:40 +0000 UTC]

...

yes. i agree...? your smart. i am the worst at math and science. are you in high school? what grade?

i was just comparing thom to two magnets, ++ oppose eachother and -- oppse, butt +- and -+ attract.

gah, make me feel utterly stupid. ;D either way, our thom's are attracted. and thom's hot. agree?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bunsushi In reply to thomismyart [2006-03-04 18:57:35 +0000 UTC]

lol: 17 years old; Senior in High School.

Thom = hott, agreed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

thomismyart In reply to bunsushi [2006-03-04 19:08:01 +0000 UTC]

wait how r you 17 and a senor? arent you supposed to be a junior?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bunsushi In reply to thomismyart [2006-03-05 05:21:04 +0000 UTC]

I'm just going to make this in response to the, um, three replies...

1: I like Thom Yorke - doesn't bother me to say that. Yes I am 17 years old. Yes I am a Senior.
2: If you checked my profile, I'm female -- not quite sure where you got the otherwise... So, no, I don't have a girlfriend. Although I suppose some girls might. But no, I have gentlemen callers. Congratulations on your anniversary.
3: You can still be either 17 or 18 as senior, just like you can be 16 or 17 as a junior...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomismyart In reply to bunsushi [2006-03-05 16:57:37 +0000 UTC]

1. well if i were a senior, that would be great, thus i hate you! (not really). are you smart?

2. i accidently talked to you about a girlfriend instead of someone else, i sent it to you instead of him. my bad. i dont pay attention when i do things. ;D

3. how many gentlemen callers? are you a pimp?

4. i like how were numbering things. it keeps things organized and easy. ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 1