Aspartam In reply to Aspartam [2010-01-24 21:46:42 +0000 UTC]

Sooory I made a confusion with someone else. So tell me how to say thank you in hungarian ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sanyaaa In reply to Aspartam [2010-01-25 21:28:50 +0000 UTC]

köszönöm!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sanyaaa In reply to sanyaaa [2010-01-25 21:29:49 +0000 UTC]

"ö" se prononce comme le "e" francais...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to Aspartam [2010-01-24 19:53:41 +0000 UTC]

jeu chui pá turc, mon zami!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to slinksterdog [2009-09-25 11:06:45 +0000 UTC]

i just needed photos of grasshoppers, and before i could start searching for one, this one just dropped in my dev watch! that's exactly what i needed, thank you, a detailed side view and nice textures - and i like the photo itself with the colored wires...
thank you for the fav too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

slinksterdog In reply to sanyaaa [2009-09-28 15:01:49 +0000 UTC]

awesome!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to garbages [2009-09-25 11:14:52 +0000 UTC]

megint adtál okot rá rendesen pityu!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to disenchanted987 [2009-09-02 10:00:15 +0000 UTC]

noproblem

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to imthehappyowl [2009-08-26 12:51:14 +0000 UTC]

danke

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to mahlukat [2009-08-15 17:11:31 +0000 UTC]

similarities of words are not everything and may root in very different layers... you should check this [link] for a list of similar words in english and hungarian. the guy's theory is that there was a first language, of which every other language sprung: and hungarian is the closest to that language. not to say it's the mother of all languages
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in it." - hungarian is ancient, rich and also very conservative, because of the closed nature of its grammar.
i'd say, as every old lady of her age, she had parents, grandparents and great-great-grandparents, also children and grand-children, cousins and other relatives. there are even relations with japanese language.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mahlukat In reply to sanyaaa [2009-08-17 08:11:05 +0000 UTC]

not excatly. turkish and hungarian are the children of old ancient "turkic"(people whose lived between euroasia to siberia once upon a time- around 10.000 bc) language. japanese(and korean) also. all of them are relative of each other, and grand children of this ancient language. this is the reason of why old turkic script and nordic runes are the same(*). english and other indo-european languages are different from that. but when(turkic tribes-such as schytes [link] are turkic, not iranic) they appear on europe on prehistoric times, they also affect the settled people on europe. they learnt them many things.

(*)check it: [link]
[link]
[link] why they are so similar? think about that.

so, its long story. only thing is, dont believe what you read what they tell. this is a knowledge enough to know. cheers

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sanyaaa In reply to mahlukat [2009-08-17 12:49:43 +0000 UTC]

"dont believe what you read what they tell"
you mean i should see all the story by my own eyes, to believe it?
to a certain point, i do see it, by the artifacts and motifs that live up to this day.
we could talk days about the scythians but for sure you dont have to link wiki pages on them for me.
amybe one day in türkiye/magyarország/somewhere else.. certainly not a subject to discuss in short comments. all i could do is to judge your judgements and have opinions on your opinions but there's no point - i'll much more share something i've learnt some days ago - our king mathias corvinus, greatest defendant against ottoman empire, called his adversary mehmet II, in their correspondance, one of the two true kings of his age, being a scythian descent. (guess who's considered the other true king. ) - as opposed to all the kingies and princies of europe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to mahlukat [2009-07-29 01:29:29 +0000 UTC]

saadet mutluluk

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mahlukat In reply to sanyaaa [2009-07-29 11:01:07 +0000 UTC]

ahha (you said "peacefulliness hapiness") first one is from old language. anyway, thanks. i now many words from hungarian, but most of them are bad words. and your "basz" means "push" in turkish, very ordinary word.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sanyaaa In reply to mahlukat [2009-07-29 11:49:00 +0000 UTC]

internet dictionaries rule!
i know about the turkish origin of our precious word - a nice coincidence is "baszki" what we say when something bad happens (unexpectedly), or we want to express our stressful situation - do i know well that "baski" means something like mental pressure in turkish?

do you know the "zsebembe sok kicsi alma van" thing? if not, can you translate it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mahlukat In reply to sanyaaa [2009-07-29 12:46:25 +0000 UTC]

ahah that means, there is so small apple in my pocket. this sentence is excatly same meaning, word by word, suffix by suffix. suffix "m" is for ownership, possession. my apple, applem. elmam.

i was working on multicultural company one year ago. there are so few that pronunciate "ö", "ü", "ı" (not i), except hungarians.

i know "basz" means "fuck" in hungarian. and, basz(bas) means push in turkish, baskı (baszki) means pressure, stress.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

sanyaaa In reply to mahlukat [2009-08-15 16:57:45 +0000 UTC]

peacefulliness happiness, mahlukat!
about ö, ü, there were no french people at the company?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanyaaa In reply to mahlukat [2009-07-30 01:36:20 +0000 UTC]

lots of small apples yeah! i've also tested that on a turkish kid, yes, suffix by suffix...
as for "ö" "ü", no french people at the company?
yes magyar has a lot of vowels and consonants, the old mates surely had a hard time applying latin characters. á é ó ö ő ú ü ű, cs dz, dzs, gy, ly, ny, sz, ty, zs are the pluses.
old hungarian script has a different character for each of them.
that's another good example on the erosion of history, how they're treating this alphabet: most people you meet would tell you the widespread misinformation (told to generations) that it's an artificial one, created in the 13th century based on.. well, older alphabets. but archeological evidence from árpád's conquest era doesn't fit in the picture, not to go farther. (as you may know "official" theory tells árpád's people to be the first hungarians in the carpathian basin.) (to read out avar stuff in clear and round magyar is already a heresy)

hungarian history is artificially split in two. what was before árpád is told to be too foggy to see. while the space and timeframe they trace magyars back, is, oops, coincides with the scene of the last remains of regressing hunnish empire. you just have to put the two books next to each other because for some reason you don't find it in one single book. (or at least not one published by the academy)
material culture is fully continuous, russian researchers call "latest hun" what "we" call "earliest magyar". those very objects. and believe me my brother, everyone in the old generation can read russian... the problem is with publishing something they can't - once they took sides (and this happens early because the poor version is taught in elementary school) - you don't contradict yourself and your circles...those who dare can become isolated..!

this theory used to be the interest of the monarchy, of the soviet, now it's part of common thinking, too many tons of books published, too many faculties substituted, too many academic works piled up. i'm at last year at archeology so i can see this from the inside...

but i'm also experiencing a progress that's by the benefits of new methods and free communication with independent sources. old minimalist theory can't take it much longer since its methods and solutions are out dated. it's going to roll over. there's byzantine inner politics at hungarian archaeology scene, but that's not gonna last forever, dinosaurs will die.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0