lhclegion In reply to Zandrae [2004-08-19 04:03:35 +0000 UTC]

j0

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

foxjane In reply to ThorsVision [2003-11-17 04:58:23 +0000 UTC]

paranoid, aren't we?
Joey was the one who linked -me- here, since you accused me of conspiring. He also linked me to your previous bitchings at Kami. I simply laughed and decided to stay out of it for JD's sake, because I care for him. I love him, he's one of the greatests friends I've ever had. I'm still very greatful I got to meet him and hang out with him in person.
But now you've brought -me- into things for no reason.
-You- were the one who started a little one-girl bitchfight. You were the one that began the talk show drama, with the "STAY AWAY FROM MAH MAN ::snap snap::" attitude. Hah. Your pride is so badly bruised that you had to start another snit? See, if you were mature, or secure with yourself or with JD, you wouldn't have said anything. You would have ignored it and moved on.

Seems to me that you're using James as leverage to bitch at Kami.

And stop referring to yourself as a wolf. Wolves are noble creatures. You're more like a sniveling, drooling hyena.

Now go off to your little secret journal and openly flame me like you've done before. Or will you run to the dA admins with your tail up your snatch? Or maybe both! i'm genuinely amused.

oh! or you could even blame the fight that you started on your "bad" English, even though you've been chatting online- in English- for 5 years, if not more.

And once again, you've breached the truce that -you- proposed. You're a sad, sad little girl.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lhclegion In reply to ThorsVision [2003-11-17 04:52:44 +0000 UTC]

whoever forwarded me to verm's page is not of your concern, striapach. and for your information, it wasn't any of "TEH USHUL SUSPEKTS" like red or jane or kami. so instead of pointing fingers why not just shove 'em up your nose, poostema.

if you really think my existance isn't acknowledged by you, my dear zift, then why do you keep reading my LJ and bitching over the latest post where i MIGHT or MIGHT NOT have insulted you?

and before you start calling my ass fat, perhaps you should do something about the rather ovoid shape of your head.

oh yeah, speaking of pictures, that reminds me.

[link]

seriously. i don't care. you were the one who violated the truce first. so until you fucking own up and admit that you're nothing but a child who has a temper tantrum every time someone has the audacity to poke fun at your own inability to accept people not liking you, i'm going to have my fun and drive you absolutely batshit until you either kill yourself or wind up in a sanitarium for the criminally insane. both are equally as likely, so i'm running a betting ring to see which happens first.

i hope iceland sinks. it's the european version of canada.

tant ghandek zejziet imdendlin li meta tkun fis-seba' sular in-nippliet ikunu qed isaqsu fejn hu t-tarag.

decipher THAT.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lhclegion In reply to lhclegion [2003-11-17 04:57:09 +0000 UTC]

oh yeah, incidentally, i'm very amused at the fact that you scream about how much you hate sex, but then you start dating the guy who for years has been infamous for being a massive pervert. maybe i should tell you what he did with a scanner sometime.

hint: think "rorschasht test".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

foxjane In reply to lhclegion [2003-11-17 05:02:26 +0000 UTC]

that wasn't necessary... I wish you had left JD out of it...he's not responsible for Dema, Dema is not responsible for him (though she'd like to think so).
besides...hate sex? haha, yeah right. she -loves- porn so much, and claimed to fuck some guy she hardly knew IRL. she probably only made that up to hurt you anyways. haa

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

abyschan In reply to akaineko [2003-10-15 22:36:54 +0000 UTC]

Yanno, if I could understand half of that LJ post, I might be able to understand your point of view. All I got from it was that she was molested as a child and then something about getting turned on.

Ewwww.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

foxjane In reply to akaineko [2003-10-15 21:35:57 +0000 UTC]

and how did I get blamed for this? o_o;
i've been leaving comments on Joey's site for awhile now, he's like my big brother.
so...why am I blamed for something Joey decided to do himself?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lhclegion In reply to akaineko [2003-10-15 21:22:55 +0000 UTC]

whatever, kevin.

[link]

get off my dA page. i hope the riot police drag you through the mud.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lhclegion In reply to akaineko [2003-10-15 18:47:15 +0000 UTC]

like i look at little girl porn? fuck that.

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

akaineko In reply to lhclegion [2003-10-15 18:49:19 +0000 UTC]

me stfu? But oh my! I thought you lived in this big country of free speech? ;o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lhclegion In reply to akaineko [2003-10-15 20:15:06 +0000 UTC]

*snort* if i say i don't like something, 2049502943590287203598540298509345032945 09285937938759475987349 of that something's fans come out to piss on me. my speech ain't free 'cuz it goes against what's "popular". so why should i let YOU talk?

free speech is dead or dying in a nation of "tolerance".

whatever. despite the fact that US law does not cover you, o great and holy eurotrash, you are still drawing what amounts to kiddie porn. take it from me, who likes good old american porn, and my neighbor, who has a video of a naked woman throwing darts at balloons with the sound of dogs barking on the audio track: your kiddie porn is disgusting and immoral. now before you or any of your brainless squealing fans take that to mean i'm against homosexuality (and thus launching a " let's smash joey" campaign, hahahahahahaha, when i never even mentioned homosexuality...) allow me to put a verbal bullet in your collective heads by informing you that i indeed am -not-. exactly what they're doing is of no importance. the fact of the matter is that they look like children, and so much as even looking like children is grounds for legal action. THEREFORE, despite the fact that the law doesn't cover you (and consider yourself lucky... although perhaps you should research the legal books in your home country? you may be suprised...) anybody in the united states who is in possession of your artwork very well could be prosecuted.

for what it's worth, your two main characters (like what you have as your featured deviation) dosn't bother me. they actually look like they're legal. if you wanna dress 'em up like girls more power to you. if i were like really really drunk or stoned i'd probably mistake 'em for girls anyhow.

admittedly my posting of that law was sort of a personal attack, but it was moreso on your fans. i've said it before and i'll say it again- fans ruin everything. it was also a heads up- kiddie porn laws are getting stricter and stricter all the time, in the u.s. as well as the rest of the world, so you'd best be careful. remember what happened to pete townshend, and he was just doing research.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

foxjane In reply to brandowilly [2003-09-15 06:02:37 +0000 UTC]

[link]

That's just a photo with a rather basic photoshop filter. This is what LHC is talking about. He didn't mean that people who use photoshop are stupid, he means that people who use one lame filter and call it art are stupid. In which case, LHC actually forms a layout for his CD covers, while Mechobo's so-called art is just shit with ONE photoshop filter on it. It's called having the program make the art instead of using EFFORT.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

foxjane In reply to foxjane [2003-09-15 22:30:02 +0000 UTC]

" and i would mind if you wouldnt talk about my friends like that."

Yeah, because it's like you're flaming my friend.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

foxjane In reply to foxjane [2003-09-15 22:32:45 +0000 UTC]

its -not- like*
groggy typos

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

brandowilly In reply to foxjane [2003-09-15 22:06:23 +0000 UTC]

do i know you? and i would mind if you wouldnt talk about my friends like that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0