HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| dreamroamer

dreamroamer [351517] [2003-02-10 00:55:55 +0000 UTC] (Unknown)

# Statistics

Favourites: 17; Deviations: 0; Watchers: 12

Watching: 1; Pageviews: 4960; Comments Made: 651; Friends: 1


# Comments

Comments: 148

breakbeat [2004-01-27 05:03:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

4EverYoungKid In reply to breakbeat [2013-06-22 19:11:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

endlesschain [2003-12-10 18:38:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rakie [2003-11-11 22:51:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

endlesschain [2003-10-23 05:59:36 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the comment and "dismantling" = ).

look, another jellyfish

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

endlesschain [2003-10-06 02:24:03 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the watch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

endlesschain [2003-10-06 02:20:47 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the watch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-10-04 08:56:39 +0000 UTC]

You are becoming most professional in your commenting I must say!

The background before actually had the texture of the paper beneath the peas, but I figured I'd get a shitload of complaints, so I left it out.

Dangerous to be idle? Eh?

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

groups_moved [2003-10-01 16:20:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rakie [2003-10-01 14:25:37 +0000 UTC]

thanQ for your comment , hehe yeah its watercolour, you can kinda tell why i dont paint much.. uhhm, yeah, .... hehe mischeivous ....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-10-01 04:18:15 +0000 UTC]

I'd tried different variations with the hole in the corner cropped, but the image seemed to lose a bit of the depth, so I just left it there.

It was light brushed which is why the light appears to be all over the place. Also a possible reason why the scratches look quite ill.

Are you a professional critic or something? You give the most incredible feedback!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-09-26 10:08:43 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. I had to double the canvas height so that the composition wasn't too close. I had you in mind, or should I say ON my mind. You scare me!

Hmm.. yeah. The afternoon sun was quickly fading, so I didn't have much time to worry about exposure. I could've worked on it a little more though.

TY as usual for such a thoughtful comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-09-21 07:27:36 +0000 UTC]

Aww. It's nice to hear from you again.

The water was moving too fast for the flash to freeze it hence the blur. Jagged edges?

Thank you, thank you my friend for such a decent comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Minako-chan [2003-09-19 15:38:49 +0000 UTC]

HI DREAM!! I GOT SCHTUFF UP SO COME AND CHECK IT OUT! wai!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kuroineko [2003-09-19 03:54:15 +0000 UTC]

Hey, the forum posting is restricted to me now.. You too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-09-10 23:26:18 +0000 UTC]

Ha. Damn composition! Thank you, thank you my friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sola-scriptura [2003-09-09 01:10:59 +0000 UTC]

Uh, yeah. Would my type of art be accpeted on da underground. I seem to be an odd one out, with everyone else doing cartoon things. Yeah, do oyu have a comp going or anything?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-09-08 05:49:26 +0000 UTC]

Eep! I knew I'd get burned at the stake by you for that composition! But thank you for the tips. Will try them out!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dark-echo [2003-09-05 12:47:19 +0000 UTC]

Nit-picking indeed



Nah, I agree, the left hand side could've done with some more space. But that would've both ruined the elongated look of the shot and would've put some more junk in there. As it is, I already had to remove three cables and three locals watching the dances. Kept me busy quite a while

Glad you like Dance of the Yanque and my old ID too. It means a lot to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-09-05 00:33:05 +0000 UTC]

You are in touch with your feelings! Thank you for the detailed analysis!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

virtualdesign [2003-09-01 20:15:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your comments!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wyndigo [2003-09-01 16:15:51 +0000 UTC]

Meanie. Don't eat Yogurt. Nice stuff by the way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

homesickellian [2003-09-01 04:30:08 +0000 UTC]

whats all this man stuff people keep on saying

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

homesickellian [2003-09-01 04:29:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment lovely lady . I might redo the picture because I messed up on the border and I might try to fix the picture itself since I scanned this when I Was new to my Negative scanner..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

faggus [2003-08-31 19:36:11 +0000 UTC]

nice icon, man

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dark-echo [2003-08-30 14:38:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment, man. I'm glad you like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

slvrmntzn [2003-08-29 10:33:36 +0000 UTC]

Ahh.. thank you so much for the comment & the +fav on 1102829! How did I know where you took the Leavitt & Peirce picture? I have been there myself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dreamroamer [2003-08-29 01:07:44 +0000 UTC]

Didn't tamper with the numbers, lol. (glances again) It's not even anymore.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rakie [2003-08-29 01:02:42 +0000 UTC]

~dreamroamer
Dreamroamer
is a Critic
is a deviant since Feb 9, 2003, 5:55 PM
has 1,400 pageviews
is online
SUCH AN EVEN NUMBER!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-08-28 13:27:36 +0000 UTC]

Yup. Made it as a wallpaper for myself. WTF is this. I've have a shitload of comments in the last few minutes. Oh well! TY for the comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dark-echo [2003-08-28 11:51:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment and the , man. It means a lot to me and made me very happy

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

homesickellian [2003-08-28 01:43:08 +0000 UTC]

ahh.. new image.. again.. I know what its from but why this wierd guy with a mask or a painted face...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dreamroamer In reply to homesickellian [2003-08-28 13:54:21 +0000 UTC]

lols @ homesickellian -- a gift from * qoi . Interesting artistic interpretation. But the portrait makes me look like the weirdest alien of his DA next door neighbours, so it's cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

homesickellian In reply to dreamroamer [2003-08-28 14:56:59 +0000 UTC]

yeah I know it was from qoi.. but why are you a wierd alien? lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dreamroamer In reply to homesickellian [2003-08-28 15:08:29 +0000 UTC]

(shrugs) Don't know. Don't care. It's the result of an artist's effort and time. It's kawaii(!) That's all one needs to know. ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-08-28 01:16:18 +0000 UTC]

Yes it's me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

homesickellian [2003-08-26 00:17:50 +0000 UTC]

so... whats the new icon.. to me it looks like a road leading to the moon... but thats a guess heh.. to small

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dreamroamer In reply to homesickellian [2003-08-26 00:19:24 +0000 UTC]

lols, no, that's Jello in his jimporium.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

homesickellian In reply to dreamroamer [2003-08-26 00:21:33 +0000 UTC]

lol.. wha?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-08-25 23:04:15 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, thank you for the other comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-08-25 22:53:09 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! I was having an awful time with composition. The metal spiral, just wouldn't fit any composition. I tried cropping the black but then that didn't work either. Anyhow, TY!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

urbanparadox [2003-08-25 16:21:21 +0000 UTC]

thanx for the comment. i'm not that sure how much paradox i did, about 30 i did and about 15-20 i've published.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cyrillic [2003-08-23 14:24:07 +0000 UTC]

thanks man i enjoyed your comment thx for +fav too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dreamroamer [2003-08-23 04:55:46 +0000 UTC]

To: *homesickellian , and to Whom It May Concern
Re.: Deviant Comments


If I were as intelligent as you gave me credit for, I would have simply ignored your posts. You had asked for my thoughts with regards to some social issues/queries. These were: religion, the critic, and legalisation of marijuana. Modestly, politely, even if ignorantly, I responded, merely for the pleasure of the philosophical discourse. Everyone has their own views particularly in this regard, and I respected yours.

You, sir, on the other hand, not only have you failed to return that mutual respect, but sought to deliberately misinterpret my statements, posting your erroneous paraphrases in public view. These posts generate controversy and irritation on the part of other deviants that browse the material and misunderstood them to be my beliefs.

Secondly, it goes without mention that the tone of your messages often take an accusatory, if not irrelevant turn. In your post of August 22, 2003 (#11420680), you inadvertently assumed a) I did not like you; b) I did not like you because I was "anti-pot" and c) I was "anti-pot". For your information, *homesickellian , and for anyone else who may have possibly been offended as a result of this immature conduct on his behalf, I

a) had accorded him the courtesy as befits every deviant, and amiability as he had initially displayed in our brief conversations.

b) became unsettled by his careless, disrespectful treatment of my questions/responses directed to him. I admit, that, in my early efforts to answer the questions he put forth, it necessitated my leaving deviant comments frequently on his page, and have now regretted doing so, knowing how offensive the act can be, now having experienced it myself firsthand. My comments, however, were always relevant to the topic that was being discussed, and never in a derogatory tone or use of vocabulary, as he has of late, on my page, of which I will mention in a moment.

c) am not anti-marijuana. Frankly, being insufficiently informed and therefore not in a position to pronounce judgement, I simply respect those who wish to avail themselves of the option. I had put in a query about the benefits of (legalising) marijuana out of mere curiosity, upon which this individual immediately pronounced me to be "anti-pot."

Your posts, sir, have of late carried improper language in address in addition to being arbitrary. Your post on Aug 21, 2003 (#11396371) makes incomprehensible remarks that would be more appropriate for the journal; instead, you chose to litter my page with stereotypical assumptions about deviants and later, in your attempts to illicit some response on my part, you fabricated the impression that I was being ill-mannered by my declining to respond -- of which, one does have a right to do under these circumstances. In fact, it is probably the more suitable action to take in such instances of spamming and abuse.

Finally, if you please, I am formally requesting that you refrain from filling my pages/account with depreciative posts and remarks, and hope that, to avoid complications with authorities, you will comply with this simple request graciously.


Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

endlesschain In reply to dreamroamer [2003-08-23 09:23:35 +0000 UTC]

my my my, haven't been here in a while = \. how does one make those cool square icons?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dreamroamer In reply to endlesschain [2003-08-23 15:33:42 +0000 UTC]

~endlesschain -- do you mean the avatars? Just upload a .gif image to your account that is 50 x 50 pixels and under 15Kb in size. Use Adobe Imageready or a similar program for animated .gifs. Easy. Email me if you need more help.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

endlesschain In reply to dreamroamer [2003-08-25 07:58:03 +0000 UTC]

hmmm, i can't slow the stupid thing down....tried modifying the delay beneath each frame (image ready). and tried adding new copies of the existing frames.... should i try mashing the keyboard? *= o

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

homesickellian [2003-08-23 03:19:00 +0000 UTC]

wtf.. your just gonna stop talkin to me because of one view we think differently about? I thought you were more intelligent than that.. you seemed very smart to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dafamily [2003-08-22 18:14:30 +0000 UTC]

wow u have an amazing skill inphotography id loveto c more

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

homesickellian [2003-08-22 15:13:48 +0000 UTC]

at least have the respect to answer why and what its abouT?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>