HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| TheFurryRiot
TheFurryRiot
[9836501]
[2009-03-02 01:17:15 +0000 UTC]
"Killing off the Virus"
(United States)
# Statistics
Favourites: 0; Deviations: 0; Watchers: 3
Watching: 0; Pageviews: 2179; Comments Made: 90; Friends: 0
# Comments
Comments: 133
DeviantArt DOES actually have some decent art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Glad you enjoy this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha I certainly do x3 Funny stuff man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, it certainly is quite entertaining. Definitely a favorite pastime.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Not really siding since I am not a fan of the fursecution complex but...
Trying to stop/get rid of furries is just about as effective as trying to plug a dam with your finger. There's just too much furriness on the internet for it to be truly eradicated.
But that's just me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha, yes, sadly. Some of us are the farthest things from being fans but that's not totally what we're trying to accomplish. Mostly at this point we're trying to get artists to correctly label their art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You mean like set it to the anthro category?
I think furries need to calm down some. I know I am a ragin' furfag and some people are going to think it's weird. I don't care though, and well... if you're going to be into strange stuff then you shouldn't be surprised if you don't get all too positive reactions from it. But that's just how I stand on that issue.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, set it to the anthro category.
Agreed fully, and again although most of us on this account don't agree with the whole furry fandom, most of us aren't trying our best to wipe it out. Mostly because that would be pretty much impossible at this point. However, if they could please just label it under the proper categories things would be much better for them and anyone whom does not like this style.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I actually wonder why anthro and anime got their own categories seeing how neither are an art medium(like paints, digital, etc) but just.. content?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Our guess is because people got so widely annoyed by it. Like fanart or artistic nude! All of these things would be fine if people would properly categorize so those who want to avoid it could.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
What are you replying to. When it is known what you're confused about you will be filled in.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pretty much everything I see here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha, disagreements about furries, anthros, and all related.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So.. You guys hate furries or.. Furries hate you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha, both, kind of. Though, hate and opposition are different.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
To those who have suggested that we hide comments that we disagree with:
No, sorry but no. That won't happen because the people who have commented with adverse opinions to our own have cared enough about their opinion to take their time to comment. Also No because that would mean that we were just grasping at straws hoping to destroy evidence, making it look like we are losing.
Thank you for your attempted help but no.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well well well, what have we got here? Another troll that wants to piss people off. Seems like he/she, um, no "they", are getting what they want <:
If you are being serious your "mission" will be a failure. It is impossible to bring down the furry fandom, or any for that matter, and with that known it is blatantly obvious your only "mission" is to cause a big shit storm for your entertainment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha, no, even if we wanted to we wouldn't be able to stop the whole anthro thing, unfortunately 13+ people don't have that power. However, what we are trying to accomplish is getting people to keep anthros labeled ONLY under anthros.
And yes, it is quite entertaining to see how extremely pissed people are getting over this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I can't really grasp the concept of what putting Anthros under the Anthro category will really do. DA's category system is honestly not very accurate and is difficult to use. I don't see how that will "eliminate" furry art since in your "mission statement" your little group apparently wants to purge deviantART of all "unnecessary art". That is well...a basis of a few peoples' opinions that can't control peoples' freedom of expression. Art is art, basically. If you don't like it, well...then just ignore it. And with these principals said and reading your replies to the righteous anthro artists on this page, you are clearly just trying to fool with them for your entertainment; if you were not you would not make such derogating or sarcastic insults back to them and try to explain your "mission". Yeah, that may be hard since you are on very different sides, but still.
If you really want to do that you may want to contact the staff about it (which lol I seriously doubt they will do anything because they aren't very reliable.) Making this little anti-furry thing is clearly just trying to piss people off by throwing out insults and sterotypical claims. As for the "camwhores" and "weeaboos", there isn't really getting rid of them because those are basically just phases that those people (eventually) grow out of over time.
I...really don't know what to think of this LOL.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Think what you'd like. The fact of the matter is even if we don't get what we want, at least it's been said, at least people know that there are people out here. They think we're alone in our thoughts. This isn't true. They said they had never seen someone not liking furries this much, well, they need to know that we do exist.
Yes, it is highly entertaining as well. Perhaps that's the reason it's lasted this long. Had people not carried it on this long, we probably would have lost ambition and given up, but no, they keep coming back, giving us laughs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I can understand what you mean, but what about cases where the art can fit into more than just anthro? For example, if it is fanart from a film/game/book/whatever that has anthropomorphic animals, couldn't it equally be placed in one of the fanart categories? Or are you saying that only the anthro category should be considered acceptable? While I definitely have no problem with wanting proper categorization, there are times when it's not always simple!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay, your point is valid. What we're referring to though isn't the times where it fits into multiple categories, but times when, for instance, the anthro is nude and artist label it under artistic nudity. Or the antrho is in a forest and the artist puts it under nature in PHOTOGRAPHY. I, personally, believe that it should only be put under fanart or anthro, others on this account believe that it should stay under anthro only.
Thank you to you as well for being polite and civil in your answer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I seriously hope you get hit by a bus. Anthro art isnt going away just because you dont like it. Boo hoo. Theres a lot of art I dont like either but it wont go away just like that. All you're doing is looking like a huge asshole and thats cuz you'd rather offend people than to simply ignore it.
What do you draw anyway. Why are you even on here. I bet you draw anime chicks. Now arent you something?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
In these comments trolls trolling trolls.
You have your opinion and they have theirs. There are plenty of anti and pro clubs, one more isn't going to hurt and like anthro art isn't going away neither will the people who hate it. There will always be an equal and opposite reaction to everything.
You're wasting your time here. All you two are doing is throwing judgmental insults back and forth. So rather than create unneeded tension accept that people will have differing opinions and let them do what they want and keep to your own business. They aren't causing you sleepless nights are they? Then they do not deserve your attention in the matter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're one to talk. I was just asking a question.
I wasnt insulting or name calling or any of the sort.
I was just noted by some people here on DA out of concern. Im not accusing this person of being a theif of anything. I just dont want it happening to any of us.
So how about you crawl back under your bridge and think about who you're calling a troll and who's asking a simple question. :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Depicting yourself above another and showing it is and insult. And you weren't asking a question as I Recall in your original post:
"I seriously hope you get hit by a bus. Anthro art isnt going away just because you dont like it. Boo hoo. Theres a lot of art I dont like either but it wont go away just like that. All you're doing is looking like a huge asshole and thats cuz you'd rather offend people than to simply ignore it.
What do you draw anyway. Why are you even on here. I bet you draw anime chicks. Now arent you something?"
The ONLY question you asked is what do you draw, why are you here and aren't you something, which were not directed at getting information but getting information in an offensive way. And that isn't even the main topic of your post. Your entire post was only done for showing anger to someone lower than you by trying to prove yourself higher than them just because they didn't agree with something you enjoyed. Not only does that make you at the same level as them but you wasted your time and effort on people who do not care or won't change their opinion.
Sure you asked three questions but your whole post was insults and judgmental comments.
Plus you even reverting to insults in your reply to me!
Also, calling someone a thief and " claiming" to think that it, whatever "IT" is, won't happen to you is irrelvevent to this whole conversation and this anti community. They aren't even thinking of stealing anthro or furry art when they hate it!
Your whole train of thought on this matter is jumbled and a complete mess. So don't try to cover it up and make you look like the better one on this side of the argument with your hypocritical reasoning and thought.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, THIS again. I got confused about something else, this comment is OLD. Me and this person had cleared things up on another page.
So yeah.
Whatever. Thanks a ton.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you in anyway. I honestly need to check dates of comments.
Sorry again for troubling you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, most of us do not draw anime whatsoever. As much as some of us would like it to anthro art isn't going anywhere, however, hopefully people will notice the need to keep it labeled under ANTHRO, and only under anthro. It would be quite easy to ignore if they would label it this way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Excuse me, I'm not exactly fond of furries myself(no offense to anyone here). But you don't seem to make a distinction between anthropormorphic artwork and furries.
Anthropormorphic artwork is an art style of giving an animal human qualities(a bipedal gait, talking, etc.) whilst furries, apparently, are 'furfags' who 'have sex in fursuits...' so I've been told. You obviously already know the latter, but you are labeling everyone who is an anthro artist a 'furfag', and that's not right.
The reason I'm telling you this is because I'm an anthro artist, and I personally feel insulted by your claims that state there is no difference between the art style and furries.
Please, be really careful with your wording. I'm telling you this kindly, since my opinions on furries are somewhat neutral, but you're going to insult the more sensitive anthro artists out there who aren't going to take your opinion as kindly.
Make the distinction, and don't assume that fur, a tail, and human qualities of a subject in artwork equals furry. It's rather annoying.
Also, judging by the massive amounts of negative comments on your page, you probably are going to think I'm a furry, eh? Yeah, it's idiots like you who try to force opinions on people and make pathetic attempts to convince others that they are fact. Pah. Simple-minded people like you make me sick to my stomach.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, anthro artists, though some of us aren't particularly fond of the style, aren't necessarily in question here. It's not just animals with human qualities that are so annoying, it's the ones that flaunt their 'breasts' or just basically look like whores. Yes some of us do find it particularly revolting that they're animals which these people are getting off from, but that is in some sense personal choice. However, the fact that there are anthros everywhere, most of them looking quite risque is quite annoying and dare I say nauseating.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
'We?' 'Us?' You make me laugh. I'm pretty sure TheFurryRiot is simply a riot of one.
Secondly, anthropomorphic art is not everywhere. In fact, a good 70% or more of the artwork is anime fan-art or in an anime style.
And not every anthro artist makes their characters with fucking huge tits for any furry-pervs to drool over. Most anthropmorphic artists I've come across make their characters very sensible in proportions and have a good balance in male and female anthros.
Anthropomorphic art is not nauseating, and the majority of people agree with me. And the ones that don't agree, at the very least, do not describe this art style as 'nauseating,' as you do.
You see, a person like you is so simple-minded to say that drawing an anthropomorphic animal is nauseating. I've had conflicts with people on similar subjects before. It's like labeling someone who draws dragons or demons a sadist, for example.
It's an art style. Get over it. I'm not only defending my own behalf, but I don't think anyone who is a furry will appreciate your opinion either. Face it, the majority of people here are against you and the way you have stated your opinion, and I really think you should fuck off before you get yourself into some deep shit for being such a one-track-minded dick.
I tried being nice, but apparently not everyone is open-minded and respectful of others' interests, beliefs, and cultures. To be honest, I have nothing against furries- they have their own thing, and I respect that, just as long as they don't force it upon me. Were this a simple Anti-furry club I might have not flared up against you. But you are extremely disrespectful and intolerant of others, and I feel I have to stand up against this utter idiocy.
Bottom line: you're pretty much insulting everyone here- Anthro artists, furries, and everyone in-between. You're basically trying to say in your own little pretentious way, "fuck off, my opinion is fact." Wrong-o, ass-wipe. You've got no facts to back you up. All I'm seeing is a poorly stated opinion.
'Revolting...' Hah, the only thing revolting here is you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
By nauseating she meant those which are WAY out of proportion and dressed particularly whorish.
It is known that some anthor artists draw proportionate characters which is why it was stated "anthro artists... aren't in question here."
Yes, that is the opinion of most of us on this account, but it's not the opinion we're trying to force, it's simply to get anthro artists to label their art under the category that has been created for it. Every one of us one this account is anti-furry, or at least we all are NOW, previously I wouldn't be able to say that.
... Thank you? For the "revolting" comment...
No, I can promise you, there are more than one of us on here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fine, I'll put the anthro art side of the argument to rest. However, I still feel as if this so-called 'riot' has a really, really bad way of getting its opinion across.
Look, I'll come out with it. Drawing some fox chick with d-cup breasts and fucking animals isn't exactly right. But some people are the way they are.
Also, I'll be honest- I actually dislike some furries myself, but even I find this sort of insolence and discrimination absolutely disgusting! And I happen to know some furries, and they are not the people you make them out to be. They can still be normal people.
But people like you... and, if this really is a 'riot' as you claim, everyone in this group are just the worst kind of people- blinded by beliefs and convinced that those who do not conform aren't even human and must be shunned and put down.
It makes me wonder. Whatever happened to accepting the little differences in our society today? Oh, how I wonder what has gone wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again... We are not saying furries cannot be human, but when that is all that drives them, when that is all that matters to them, it is an obsession. To some people it's become more than a fetish, some of the riot actually knows a person who took it WAY too far and had honestly turned to animals for his sexual pleasure, this is too far.
Don't you agree that with some people 'little differences' can be taken too far? That they can certainly be deciding factors when judging a person? Yes, ideally we shouldn't judge people, but people aren't ideal creatures, and we are far from perfection, to protect ourselves we judge people, it comes naturally. Obviously this is an instinct we fight against because it does not go well when one person declares him or her self the judge of all. However, do you agree that there are indeed judgments we have to make to ensure the longevity of the human race and our own lives?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well ya know what? I honestly don't give a fuck. Some people do have weird obsessions, there's no denying it. But that's the way some people are. You can't change that, and not even a forced opinion will make a furry-free world that you desire so much. Everyone's got a weird obsession, I should know. Yes, things can be taken too far, but is it honestly any of YOUR fucking business? Why don't you just leave other people alone and rant to your friends(if you have any...) instead of shouting it out to the World Wide Web that you hate people with this so-called obsession.
I disagree completely. Yes, these 'little differences' can be taken too far, but they're still differences, and judging someone by differences is just absolutely sick. Just because they're interested in one thing or another it doesn't make them a repulsive, inhuman person. In fact, the people who judge others are the ones I hate the most.
Also, you are exaggerating way too much. It's as if you're saying Furries are a threat to the 'normal' way of life.
What if a close friend of yours suddenly confessed he or she was a furry? I bet you'd avoid them like the fucking plague.
Everyone's different... Can't you accept that?
I'm getting pretty tired of dealing with ignorant, fascist people like you and everyone in your little group. I feel so stupid- what a fucking waste of my time this was! Trying to convince stubborn people to change their ways. Pft. People are people, I suppose.
Get a life and/or a girlfriend, you dick.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hah, not all of us are guys you asswipe. (oops violated our rules.)
No, they would not be avoided, but they would be spoken to and asked to please NOT FLOOD OUR LIVES WITH FUR.
Yes, that is accepted. Do you think that there should be NO JUDGEMENT? Whatsoever? Hell you know what, you're right, why judge anyone? I'll go call the axe murderer back to babysit for me tonight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I fail to see your point. 
Oy vey. I'm not saying there shouldn't be any judgment, it's that you're being unreasonable about a lot of this stuff. Like I said, you're making the assumption that all of these 'furries' are all the same. That, my friend, is prejudice.
I am honestly getting tired of this... you know what? Go on about your business. Go on, just keep on pushing this little fascist opinion as long as you want. I'm sure your opinion will eventually be respected and taken seriously.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
First, furry is not a race there for claiming it is prejudice is inaccurate.
Second, everyone has their own opinion, if you disagree then fine if you agree, good for you. You have wasted your time here. You won't change anyone's opinions and all you are doing is venting unneeded steam and creating anger and drama. Carry on with your own ways and let them carry on with their's.
It's not hurting anyone by having differing opinions and all of you are exactly the same so stop thinking you are better or less than anyone else.
Both of you are hypocritical. Knock it off and both of you mind your own business.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Haha, there we go. Part of our point is that you guys are overly persistent. Now that you have withdrawn a little your helping to prove your side a little better. Still, the fact still remains that many are still not properly categorizing and even so we still believe that there is too much. However, being as this would be nearly impossible to change, on this last topic we have to accept defeat, for now anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You're fucking pathetic. Your mindset is equal to that of the KKK, as it's been said before. You are also not in majority in this matter. Anthropomorphic art may not appeal to others, but they can understand that ideas are free and respect people for their differences in thoughts.
Not as many people are against furry as you seem to think. A lot of people aren't as damn shallow and biased as you are.
I also find it funny that you only have a single watcher, yet already more than five people are against your narrow views. You should take that as a hint. Conforming to social paradigms is a bad thing, especially at the extent to which you are projecting it.
If you disagree with something, that is perfectly understandable. But you may NOT force opinions and ideas upon everyone else, and you may NOT disrespect those with differing views. If you truly believe you are an intellectual being, you should be able to follow these ideals with ease.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As it has already been said, the art choice is indeed a choice. It's the whole animal sex appeal that is being questioned here. Is it still allowed? Yes. We are asking that it be labeled only under anthro so that we who aren't fond of it don't have to see it everywhere. The watcher that we have has contacted us because they have received notes that aren't so... polite. Did you ever consider the possibility that maybe others fear the same?
There have been others that got the password to this account and said some things that the others of us do not agree with, however, that problem has been solved and the password changed. So, if we are all willing to put our best foot forward and go about this how it was originally meant to be gone about then things should turn out well, for one group anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>