HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| PaperBerry
PaperBerry
βοΈ
[5300098]
[2007-08-08 18:10:45 +0000 UTC]
"None of your business"
(Netherlands)
# Statistics
Favourites: 0; Deviations: 0; Watchers: 10
Watching: 47; Pageviews: 6372; Comments Made: 1267; Friends: 47
# Comments
Comments: 150
i give you
four and a half stars
out of six
π: 0 β©: 0
Hello! Sorry for not giving any news for some time. I was busy with assignments and exams. It's over now, thankfully! Almost got crazy there. My hotmail account is lost, I can't have it back. It irks me much since I had all of our old Rps in it.
Ah well. How are you? Are you done with school this year?
Are you willing to continue rping with me?
π: 0 β©: 1
Your nowadays user name is particular accurate right now. ;D I'm glad to finally see you back. Did everything work out for you at school?
I am sorry to hear about your hotmail account. I have all our old rp mails still, so if you take a new account, I can always resend them. I'm eager to pick up RPing again, but I request not until the 22nd. I'm having some very important tests right now and can't afford the (extra) distraction. After that I still have work to do until July, but I can relax somewhat then.
As an aside, I have a tumblr account these days at parrotbeak.tumblr.com. It's a mix of social justice stuff, fiction thoughts, and sometimes something silly. It might give you an idea of what I've been concerning myself with outside of school these past months, if you care to read that is.
Again, great to have you back!
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, everything worked out fine for me, I guess I am kinda obliged to stay there now, since I am this school year's honor student.
I will set up a new account soon. And I'd be very happy if you could re-send me our old Rp's once it is done! Thank you so much in advance!
But for the moment, I'll leave you finish your tests in peace. I'll get back to you afterward ( after the 24th, since I'm going to London with my classmates during the weekend)
I'll gladly pick up RP too,and find a way for Starscream to get back at DZ ( that is, if four-week-exams haven't fried most of my neurons already)
I took a look at your tumblr account, haven't read all the posts though. Racism and sexism are two topics I'd rather stay away from. Personal experiences and beliefs telling me not to engage in any debate on these subjects.
good luck for your test. c:
π: 0 β©: 1
Both me and my sister congratulate you with your accomplishment!
For the rest, talk to you later. And do forget about the Tumblr account if it ain't your cup of tea. 
π: 0 β©: 0
So, which letter of the alphabet should we deem offensive now?
π: 0 β©: 1
Q.
That faggot has been pissing me off all my life. Fuck Scrabble, I play Upwords, and in that game, Q is its own tile.
Fucking bullshit, man.
π: 0 β©: 0
This fandom has created more then you could ever hope to accomplish in your patheitic life.
π: 0 β©: 1
the MLP fandom existed before you were born, kid.
π: 0 β©: 1
That depends on how you look at it. And this is not your battle.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't know what is more disturbing, you harassing and sending hate mail to a person that had a disagreement on something or the fact that you can't really grasp the "love and tolerance" thing.
Is it really Love and Tolerance for you to be rude to someone?
No
It is not.
Have you even payed attention what the show was trying to teach people about friendship?
Though I really doubt you will respond in a civilized manner without calling me names because I disagree with what your actions are towards this person. This person did nothing to hurt you other than explain something and apparently this person is evil or something.
If the fandom is going to refuse it's own motto of "love and Tolerance", then I am scared to join it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Here's the thing. I'm what you'd call, a renegade. I'm sure you've heard of that word before, have'nt you? I don't love and tolerance is always the answer. And i'm of the hyprocrisy, which is what pains me. Some would call me a terrible fan of the show, not meant to be a part of it. But I only see the truth.
π: 0 β©: 2
Matthew 7:12 : [Jesus said,] "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."
Matthew 22:35-40 : One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: βTeacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?β
Jesus replied: ββLove the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.β This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: βLove your neighbor as yourself.β All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.β
So, how do you reconcile your behavior towards PaperBerry and toxicZodiac with what Jesus said was the main command of the Bible?
π: 0 β©: 1
Sometimes you have read in between the lines.
π: 0 β©: 1
Those commands seem pretty clear-cut to me; reading between the lines on them is like reading between the lines of a stop sign.
John 14:23, 24 : Jesus replied, βAnyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them. Anyone who does not love me will not obey my teaching. These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me."
See also Luke 6:27-49 and Luke 10:25-37 .
1 John 4:7,8 : "Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love."
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh really, so should we have loved Osama and kim jong?
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew 5:44-45a : [Jesus said,] "But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven."
Yes. Which is not to say we should have given them what they wanted or let them go unpunished for their crimes, but rather that we should pray for them to turn from their wicked ways. Note Stephen's behavior as he was being stoned for preaching the Gospel: "While they were stoning him, Stephen prayed, 'Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.' Then he fell on his knees and cried out, 'Lord, do not hold this sin against them.' When he had said this, he fell asleep." (Acts 7:59,60)
Even if you believe that it's OK to hate murderers and tyrants, though, what justification do you have to extend that to people you disagree with on the internet?
π: 0 β©: 1
Because it's impossible for the human race not to have some sort of anger and hate towards someone.
π: 0 β©: 1
Then I'd say it's time for you to ask God to help you learn to rein in your anger and hate. That's a prayer I have to make fairly often, even after all this time.
π: 0 β©: 1
I pray to god only when its extremely important. There are those who have larger prayers that need answers.
π: 0 β©: 0
Well I guess you are at least being truthful of what you are doing. Though Still, it is rather immoral to harass someone over a small thing. If you pay so much attention over the little things, then how are you going to live in the real world? Its common that most people care for the little things abit too much, but it never really gets them anywhere.
What would be the point? Most people who find themselves Sane tend to think that people like you are not worth wasting their breath on because of the incapability of not reading thoroughly. Though It is easy to misinterpret things, but it's best never to jump conclusions because of misunderstanding.
π: 0 β©: 1
Immoral? Please, he was with those who were against Derpy. And tell me this, what's the point of talking to me?
π: 0 β©: 1
I dont think the person was against Derpy, only the Name.
To be honest, the name "Derpy" is offensive to mentally handicapped. But you know I have no opinion of this.
Derpy is a Fictional Character owned by Hasbro, so it is Hasbro's decision on changing her to make her less offensive to audiences, not Yours or anyone elses. The "rabid" Bronys fail to realize that Derpy does not belong to them, and so they have no rights to harass individuals because those individuals found her offensive.
If you really have very much issue about Derpy's change, then you need to voice your opinion to Hasbro, not people who found Derpy Offensive. Again, Derpy is a character owned by Hasbro, not those individuals.
But does it matter? If you still like Derpy they way she is, you don't need to have to insult others and whatnot because of the change. You Support the original Derpy, why not leave it at that?
MLP in general had been changed a lot by Hasbro, and I wonder why no one had complained about those changes and reboots. If a fictional character's change is so important, yet why does people not really notice that they can't do anything about that change because that character is copyrighted by a company or person?
I liked Derpy when she appeared, but I respect what the majority of the viewers say about her first appearances as the show is usually directed to children between 4 and 12--I would agree that it would be offensive to any of those children that happen to be mentally handicapped or physically handicapped.
Do you not think or respect that Hasbro had a reason for this change? Do you not care about the "retarded" children that might happen to watch this show?
π: 0 β©: 1
The word Derp is just a simple joke, nothing else, and we made her who she is. And those who are against those who took so much care to her, they deserve every flame they get. And have you seen kids today? They get offended at jack shit now. It's only the rabid parents who think that just because they own a child, they automatically know what's right and wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
Again, Derpy Hooves/Ditzy Doo is owned by Hasbro.
Yet you say you own her??
I think Hasbro would like to meet you in court.
π: 0 β©: 2
They created the design, but the fandom created everything else. Spiritually, we own her. And you just ignored everything else I said. You must know i'm right, then.
π: 0 β©: 1
A group of Viewers such as yourself is different than a rather rich and powerful Company.
Saying things that you somewhat own the character will bring the company's attention to you and seek a lawsuit of which I would doubt you will win because you are making claims you have little proof of.
Fandom giving character to the character is different, but it still does not mean the fandom owns the character.
Its like one of those background characters you find in Sonic the Hedgehog, or characters that was going to be introduced but was scrapped (ex: Honey the Cat for Sonic Fighters). Still those characters are property of the Company, but it does not mean you are not allowed to give character to the character if it is needed--you have no need to claim that you "own" the character because it's a background or scrapped character.
You are making a claim that you can't prove against a company capable of beating you in a court of law and taking every thing you own because you dare speak that you "own" one of their copyrighted Characters.
Your group is committing copyright infringement and that is against the law.
May Hasbro find mercy for your crimes of trying to enforce a claim on a already owned character.
It's like someone trying to take your character and saying they own it for petes sake.
π: 0 β©: 1
I said that we own her, spiritually. And if it's fanart, they can't sue shit.
π: 0 β©: 1
they can still sue you for making the "owning her" claim, Spiritually or not.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, you can't sue someone for saying something as small as that. Seriously, were you born this retarded?
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm thinking you are for claiming you own a company owned character.
Did you learn nothing in school about Copyright Infringement and Plagiarism for claims like that?
I'm in college and I know better than this.
Though I find to Fun to draw things like Games or Comics, but I don't make any claims of characters that are not mine.
It's okay to have "headcanons" or some things that might fit a character, but still I do not say that I "spiritually" own the character just because I gave it character.
π: 0 β©: 1
I never said I owned a company, idiot. And take a look at this [link]
If they gave any fucks, this would be sued ten times over. Were you dropped on your head as a child?
π: 0 β©: 1
I never said you did,
I said you are trying to own a character that's not even yours to begin with.
Your problem is not reading things right and interpreting things as you want to interpret.
I understand you like Derpy so much to stay with her old appearance, but she's still doesn't belong to you.
π: 0 β©: 1
"I'm thinking you are for claiming you own a company owned character."
Is that brain damage taking its toll? And like I said, she belongs to the fandom, and say it with me now,
S-P-I-R-I-T-U-A-L-L-Y, or is this too much for your peanut sized brain to handle?
π: 0 β©: 1
Company owned Character
not owning a company, there is a difference.
And no
Derpy does not belong to the Fandom, she belongs to Hasbro.
Do you really want to argue with me about politics here?
I've already reported this conversation to Faust.
π: 0 β©: 1
You could say that an abusive family owns a child, even if he had a much more loving adoptive family. Would that make it right?
π: 0 β©: 1
You are starting to make less sense than you have the first time.
If you are trying to say that Hasbro is this "abusive" Family then you are throwing things out of the loop.
Hasbro is not an "abusive" Family, and they had to make changes because Faust was getting letters from her viewers that Derpy was offensive because Derpy was portrayed as "retarded".
Retardation is not funny, neither is rape.
In my defense, you are raping Derpy in your own image and forcing a Claim that you have no power to do.
If you want to go into Metaphor, that is Mine.
You either stop being childish about this and actually be civil rather than call me names and insult me, or I will just admit that you are a lost cause and not worth my time.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hasbro did'nt create the new generation, the writers did. And Lauren could have had a spine and just brush them off like nothing. And I not laughing at something like that, you're way too serious. Take a joke. And I never made one about rape either. Maybe if you were to get you're head out of your ass, then maybe we'd get somewhere.
π: 0 β©: 2
I see someone who doesn't care about getting a paycheck in his future.
π: 0 β©: 1
What are you talking about?
π: 0 β©: 1
I am going to answer that question, but do know that I find you an extraordinarily unpleasant person and that I do not wish to have an argument about what I'm going to say. I don't think there's going to be need for argument either. So do me a favor and do not make an argument out of it.
You said: "Hasbro did'nt create the new generation, the writers did. And Lauren could have had a spine and just brush them off like nothing."
See, Hasbro did create the new generation by virtue of owning the franchise. The company may have hired people to do the creative thing, but those people do so in service of the company. Like, the company is the full entity and the individual is the hand - when you draw something, do you say your hand created it, or do you say you created it? I am aware the analogy is not flawless, but it helps approach the matter. If only by virtue of selecting and approving the creative minds, Hasbro made FIM.
Now on to the paycheck matter. Ignoring the wishes of the company who hired you and can fire you just as quickly and who holds your paycheck and makes the big investments has nothing to do with having a spine or not. It has, however, everything to do with decency, respect, abiding contracts, and wishing to keep the means to get food on the table every evening. Suppose Faust had brushed off Hasbro's wishes, you know what would have happened then? She'd been fired and would have a really, really ugly spot on her resume that could cause problems in finding other work. I may not be a fan of Faust by a long shot, but saying she has no spine by doing what she was hired to do is really unfair.
π: 0 β©: 1
Besides, she was'nt in charge of that anyway. And it's a metaphor, idiot, learn some proper language arts skills.
π: 0 β©: 1
Like the art of using insults and curse words every other reply? ...Neah, I leave that one for you to dirty and ostracize yourself with.
π: 0 β©: 1
Welcome to the internet.
π: 0 β©: 0
Maybe If you actually started listening, maybe we'd get somewhere.
But I highly doubt that since you like to warp things and pretend that is what I said-- but that sort of thing gets you no where really. I'm starting to think you're crazy, in fact I am admitting you might be more insane than I admit I am due to my mental instability.
π: 0 β©: 1
Look at your comments man. You take "Derp" as offensive. I'll take this as slowly as possible. C-A-L-M, still with me?, D-O-W-N.
π: 0 β©: 1
I never even said I was offended at it, I was explaining why it was offensive to others
Though I'm rarely offended at anything and have a hard time feeling emotion as I am a Sociopath.
So how can I calm down when I feel no emotion to really be upset at anything? It is unlikely one can feel emotion through text, anyway. But what does it matter to you?
I'm a sociopath.
π: 0 β©: 1
What in god's name is wrong with you?
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>