HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Matchstick-Dollie
# Statistics
Favourites: 72; Deviations: 71; Watchers: 17
Watching: 51; Pageviews: 8400; Comments Made: 745; Friends: 51
# Interests
Favorite bands / musical artists: Dresden DollsFavorite writers: Philip Larkin
Favorite gaming platform: PS1
Tools of the Trade: Canon 400d hats and wigs.
Other Interests: fashion
# About me
Current Residence: Peef.Favourite genre of music: Cabaret
Favourite photographer: Nan Goldin
# Comments
Comments: 147
hazhaz [2009-02-02 23:12:07 +0000 UTC]
I still have a half drawn unicorn for you that never got finished
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Matchstick-Dollie In reply to SoubiVee [2008-12-26 15:09:36 +0000 UTC]
OH MY GOD YES! HA! that was SO brilliant! I've completely given up with that and dA a bit!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SoubiVee In reply to Matchstick-Dollie [2008-12-27 17:11:38 +0000 UTC]
XD yah...I've given up on DA somewhat too...at least the chats....can't really bring myself to do it anymore...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
20foothigh [2008-07-11 13:49:56 +0000 UTC]
thank you for the favourite on 'first orgasm' enchanted that you like it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Matchstick-Dollie In reply to 20foothigh [2008-07-11 18:22:54 +0000 UTC]
no problem I really liked it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
strangemen [2008-06-22 20:22:26 +0000 UTC]
Shut up.
Very small minded.
Honestly, gayest pic ever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Matchstick-Dollie In reply to strangemen [2008-06-23 17:03:37 +0000 UTC]
Supose its down to opinion. Just you seemed to criticise wihtout offering any reasoning for it. Simply that you didnt like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
strangemen In reply to Matchstick-Dollie [2008-06-23 17:21:31 +0000 UTC]
I did it for the lulz.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Matchstick-Dollie In reply to strangemen [2008-06-23 19:14:23 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
allis-deviations [2008-04-26 22:24:18 +0000 UTC]
Keep up your work
I like the ideas you have
allis
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Matchstick-Dollie In reply to allis-deviations [2008-04-27 07:01:20 +0000 UTC]
Thankyou so much for your comments and time.. It is appreciated
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
silentrunner9 [2008-04-26 08:59:46 +0000 UTC]
After looking at your stuff, I have to say that you need serious work at lighting. In your recent ones it seems like the only light your using is that of the flash. In earlier works you tend to oversaturate pictures with too much light or with darkness. You need set up proper lighting for your pictures to set a mood, convey emotion and add dynamic to your work. Your compositions are also weak. Some pictures like the church piece are nice, but a majority of your pictures look like self absorbed, poorly lit, ill conceived and sometimes off centered shots that you'd plaster on a MySpace account. You need to set up your portraits in a way that guides the viewer's eye. For example things placed in the middle of the shot will be looked at as the most important subject or the way something is angled can move the viewers eye in that direction.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Fishstyx666 In reply to silentrunner9 [2008-04-28 17:55:42 +0000 UTC]
For example things placed in the middle of the shot will be looked at as the most important subject
For example things placed in the middle of the shot will be looked at as the most important subject
For example things placed in the middle of the shot will be looked at as the most important subject
For example things placed in the middle of the shot will be looked at as the most important subject
For example things placed in the middle of the shot will be looked at as the most important subject
For example things placed in the middle of the shot will be looked at as the most important subject
Your a dick.
As a third party in this critisism, i must say this is the most redicluous thing iv ever heard, hence making everything else you said irrelevent as you clearly know nothing. There is a magical thing called the rule of thirds which has also beenproven to make photos more apealing. try doing some research before critisising people, even if the intention of the critisism was to help them.
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Marina-Stalker In reply to Fishstyx666 [2008-04-29 09:17:05 +0000 UTC]
Internet. Serious buisness
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Fishstyx666 In reply to Marina-Stalker [2008-04-29 16:59:30 +0000 UTC]
Gtfo newfag. Super cerial.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Marina-Stalker In reply to Fishstyx666 [2008-04-29 21:20:17 +0000 UTC]
Aww, aren't you a cute little one <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
silentrunner9 In reply to Fishstyx666 [2008-04-28 18:41:38 +0000 UTC]
Okay, first off why are you offended? I gave an opinion and whats more she thanked me for it. I may not be the foremost authority on art and you're free to disagree with what I say, but I know a flaw when I see it. Also if you're going to criticize my work, go into detail and tell me specifically what's wrong, don't just copy and paste the same response in a pathetic attempt to get back at me. I can take criticism, I even encourage it and I don't care if it's nice or insulting as long as they make a damn good point. If all you can say is rule of thirds and no artistic talent for all the pieces you commented on, then your opinion is a waste of my time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fishstyx666 In reply to silentrunner9 [2008-04-28 18:52:52 +0000 UTC]
Im not offended. I do disagree. Not putting things in the center is not a flaw. If i thought your work deserved constructive sritism i would give it to you. Copy pasta is my favorite food. I wasted your time on porpose so you dont need to tell me that thats what i acheived.
Anything to comeback to that? I dont think so. Rant + flame = win.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
silentrunner9 In reply to Fishstyx666 [2008-04-28 19:09:54 +0000 UTC]
I didn't say things had to be in the middle to be a good picture, I said that as example of how composition works. I know full well there's a lot of ways to set up an interesting picture. I really don't care if you hate my work or think I'm dick so posting a comment to annoy me is pointless and really just immature.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fishstyx666 In reply to silentrunner9 [2008-04-28 19:12:31 +0000 UTC]
No. Thats the point. Its not an exaple of how compasition works. Suck it up, be a man, realise your wrong and shut it. im bored of you know. I dont hate your work. And i quite like you. i even went to the trouble of looking on your page. BYEEEEEEE. x
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
silentrunner9 In reply to Fishstyx666 [2008-04-28 21:46:50 +0000 UTC]
Alright I've looked at the links you posted on the previous comment and realize my mistake. I realize that my opinion on compostiton is pretty shortsighted. I can admit I'm wrong on that count and even thank you for pointing this out, but in regards to everything else I posted in the critique, I still stand by it unless proven otherwise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Fishstyx666 In reply to silentrunner9 [2008-04-29 17:03:25 +0000 UTC]
Though i still think your a fagg0t
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fishstyx666 In reply to silentrunner9 [2008-04-29 17:03:11 +0000 UTC]
Aha sorted thats all i wanted ^^
I was only winding you up love.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Matchstick-Dollie In reply to silentrunner9 [2008-04-26 10:47:17 +0000 UTC]
Cool! Thanks loads. I don't tend to like centred photographs as I think they look too neat. Also the main aim for my photographs are to capture a moment to express the idea rather than to have tonnes of thought into angles. Unorganisation is my strength .
Thanks loads for the advice though. I have some more structured shots on my computer so I will upload those later. I will consider lighting more in the future
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fucduck [2008-04-12 18:53:19 +0000 UTC]
quack quack
translate:
u iz veri cute
translate:
random message
lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhotoCrush [2008-02-17 09:25:07 +0000 UTC]
Hi there!
You've been featured in *PhotoCrush 's latest journal as an Unknown Photographer
*PhotoCrush is an account made specifically for bringing exposure to amazing younger photographers on deviantART. It's the daughter project of *PhotoLust .
Us featuring you also means that a mini-gallery of your work will be submitted to our gallery (along with the others featured) like this one [link] We understand that this could be complex seeing as your work is under your own copyright, but these are here to bring you more deviant love, not so we can steal credit from you, if you look at our example you'll see this is damn near impossible, don't worry!
However, If you'd like to be removed from our journal just send a note to us.
Thankyou, ~PrincessSlutface
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Matchstick-Dollie In reply to Shane1231 [2007-12-13 20:31:38 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>