Hattoripool In reply to Nailleha [2023-03-06 07:23:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nailleha In reply to Hattoripool [2023-03-06 10:32:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hattoripool In reply to Nailleha [2023-03-06 15:10:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nailleha In reply to Hattoripool [2023-03-06 15:20:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MakarovJAC In reply to Mrtdark1 [2014-08-18 22:46:19 +0000 UTC]

Who is Crocobat, and why should I critize him/her? Criticize what about him/her?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mrtdark1 In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-08-18 22:51:01 +0000 UTC]

mrtdark1.deviantart.com/art/Cr…

Its not a person,it's a work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MakarovJAC In reply to JuJuKat [2014-06-15 04:56:35 +0000 UTC]

Could give a reminder later? I'm busy with RL right now, and I have to take my time to get through your newest stuff. Just be patient.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JuJuKat In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-06-15 14:39:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh sure <3 it will give me plenty of time to use my new art program Manga Studio 5 which helps replace my old Photoshop haha...

I will remind you maybe on Thursday?   or would next week work better

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to JuJuKat [2014-06-15 19:17:37 +0000 UTC]

Thursday, next week, sounds fine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JuJuKat In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-06-16 14:18:45 +0000 UTC]

Mmmkay

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MakarovJAC In reply to General-Kool-Aid [2013-11-29 18:27:40 +0000 UTC]

"The wise speak only when needed. Fools never shut their mouths."  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

General-Kool-Aid In reply to MakarovJAC [2013-12-16 02:32:10 +0000 UTC]

Yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MakarovJAC In reply to AJInu-Okami [2013-11-26 21:57:37 +0000 UTC]

I'm not the inmature child whose rejecting self-improvement over ass pats.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AJInu-Okami In reply to MakarovJAC [2013-11-26 22:02:42 +0000 UTC]

Ha...haha...hahaha.HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! WTF? Seriously?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to AJInu-Okami [2013-11-26 22:11:59 +0000 UTC]

 If she acknowledging she has flaws, then using the tips she's being given; or is she making journals because she felt offended by being told she has flaws and how to fix them?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

tbonegirl28 In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-03-23 04:57:28 +0000 UTC]

except you don't give good critiques. You just insult and pretend its a good critique. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to tbonegirl28 [2014-03-23 05:11:51 +0000 UTC]

Ehm, sweetie, just like with EVERYTHING (remember those definitions back at the nose piece?) you seemingly unknow the terms you are refering to. An insult is to harm the emotional integrity of a person, intentionally. Criticism is throroug observation of someone's piece, hint issues, then advice on how to fix these problems. 

I do INSULT dolts whom are pretentious enough to pass misinformation as facts (like copying is good source of learning if it's from others works). I don't deny. But, if asked, or seing someone openly willing to improve (they ask, they wonder, they openly announce they want advice), I give it to them. It's already over with the days I forced criticism onto other people.

Wow, seriously, I did gift you a dictionary (or an aencyclopedia) if you like. You apparently can't fully comprehend what you are saying-that particular line, is an insult.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tbonegirl28 In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-03-23 06:16:38 +0000 UTC]

It's not misinformation based on my experience and many others around me in my Illustration program. We all learn by copying masters and photographs and my school attracts people from China, Africa, and India to come to our tiny school and learn because it's that good and every year the work is improving. I know my own work has improved over the years as a result of working from photos and reference images and master studies. How is it misinformation if it works? 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to tbonegirl28 [2014-03-23 06:36:54 +0000 UTC]

Now, dumbass (seriously, I even wonder if you know where are you right now), what you are saying (learning from photos and reference images (which I supposed are more photos and even footage)) you are NOT saying that you are learning from other's works (drawings, illustrations, animations, etc. Dumbass). Which outright contradictcs your claims of watching images such as the one of the stylished noses is helpful, dumbass. It outright support my claims that nature is, indeed, a learning method.

These photos ARE nature. They REFLECT nature. It's not watching another's drawings (such as the stylished noses drawing which you so much insist is a good reference). Dumbass.

Seriously, I didn't wanted to say it, but you are borderline stupid. I might be the greatest asshole on the planet, and borderline troll. But you, not fully comprehending what you are talking is painful to watch, dumbass. So all this long you were basically saying what I have been talking about all this time, but you (somehow) did not catched it? Seriously, how couldn't you, up to this time, still not notice the coincidences? You know, like nature, REAL LIFE (I repeated that a couple of times), with PHOTOGRAPHIES AND REFERENCE IMAGES OF REAL PEOPLE.

I'll give you the best advice anyone will ever give to you; ASK. Make questions. VERIFY before talking. THINK TWICE before jumping into conclusions. Make SURE that you fully comprehend what you are reading. (I was going to finish that advice calling you a dumbass, but I rather not. I seriously need you to take that into consideration).

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

tbonegirl28 In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-03-23 06:55:27 +0000 UTC]

I say learning from other peoples Illustrations animations, ect. is good

I also say using reference images, photos, and life modeling are good sources of learning as well. 

your ridged boxes of how people should learn and do art are what bothers me. I don't like modern art, but it's not hurting things. I think it helps in fact. Also seriously, "big boobs and bigger boobs" in your interests. How old are you? Seriously give your age. I'll start. I'm 21. Your turn. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to tbonegirl28 [2014-03-23 07:27:27 +0000 UTC]

You are a lost cause. Modern art has the drawback of forcing concepts into pieces of work without giving away hints of its meaning. If they only said "because it looks pretty" I wouldn't have a problem with it. But NO, they do HAVE to go around a pretending that a bunch of random lines and stains are supposed to mean an intrincate concept! One way ticket into "artisthood" for whatever dumbass who can't draw a straight line for his life.

And then, humans do have personal tastes regarding mates. Not everybody picks X girl because it was all that was left. Bust size, in this case, is a perfectly reasonable choice to look for in a mate (increased stimuly perceiption; potential for foreplay; increased sex drive on sexual partner (that one is important; a person who doesn't feel physically attracted to his/her mate is not likely to perform well during intercourse*)). And it's an interest which is not against legal or moral codes of any country (unless you are a batshit crazy feminist who vilifies well-endowed women, rendering breast as a form of "objectification" and it's presence/display as a form of "pathriarcal oppresion". Wether or not the decision of displaying cleavage is personal.

Seriously, stop pretending to be smart, and think twice what you are about to say. 

*In hillbilly English; you aren't going to do much if you are not in the mood for it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tbonegirl28 In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-03-23 06:52:09 +0000 UTC]

(I seriously need you to stop being condescending and take that into consideration) What I was trying to say all along and that you just noticed is that I said from the beginning copying people who know what they're doing is beneficial (Like the person who drew the noses. It's always good to look at more and more art of every kind even stylized). What I was also trying to get through to you was that drawing from photographs and references, films, whatever reflects like is good. That has been my position from the start. What you were telling me through this whole thing was that Life, direct life modeling, was the only way to learn. It's not the only way. Copying styles and processes can also be beneficial. 

You following so far? Hm? Pictures of all kinds good. Life observations good. Copying masters and doing master studies Good. Basics good. Insulting and disrespecting other artists Bad! VERY BAD! Also seriously you cherry picked a stupid sketch that means absolutely nothing as an example of I don't know what I'm doing(I'm an Illustration student at a good college I DO know what I'm doing). It's not perfect, but not everything is going to be so use something else that put I effort into to critique or as a true example of I have no clue what I'm doing. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to tbonegirl28 [2014-03-23 07:13:08 +0000 UTC]

I cherry picked that one because is the best example to the opposite of observation of real life. I did not took into consideration the others because they did took into that consideration. However, we go back to the beginning, your insistence in copying others works is pretty much the reason of why despite all the anatomically and aesthetically correct works in your gallery, you still missed at one which at this point shouldn't represent much of a trouble.

Also, again, stop using the term "copying", d...you know already. Why don't you switch it with "study", huh? You know, like in "observation of a person's work in hopes of understanding NOT the sources used for inspiration, but the solutions given by them for every consistent aspect of an illustration (A.K.A. Style)". Not "copying" in the sense of "outright copying whatever a person made without fully comprehending how or why did that person choose to re-interpret the form (as in shapes) into a similar, but unrealistic regardless, way".

Sorry, but reading you is frustrating. I might be an asshole, but you are confused just like a freshman which just learned about comunism, superficially. I made myself clear countless times, however, you insisted in using these terms wrong ad nauseum. Also, a good institution doesn't translate into 100% good students. There's always the black sheep. I'm not going to say you are that one, but you better begin to get your facts straight instead of misleading with bad use of terms, and poor reading comprehension. And fix that AC drawing already! A pencil sketch and having ANYONE pose for your for as long as you can quick-sketch the basic pose should be enough to fix the problem. Or you simply watch footage of olympics, marathons, or photografies, for that matter. That should fix it for once.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tbonegirl28 In reply to MakarovJAC [2014-03-23 07:36:31 +0000 UTC]

I'm not fixing it because the idea was the important thing I wanted to share. If I really cared about how it looked I would have taken the time to make a real drawing or painting. Also I don't get the difference between copying a work and studying it. It's the same thing. You study it by copying it. Thats how it works. A master study is a copy you made of a masters piece. I posted a study I did of a dragon from another user, Pythosblaze. maybe that'll help you understand what I'm what I'm saying. The pictures are side by side and I learned a lot from that process. Mainly how to work on a tablet, work in photoshop better, and color selections. You use all these fancy words, but all that you're saying is "copy" by looking and understanding the ideas behind a picture, but the best way to look at a picture is to take the time to physically reproduce it. Thats how you notice the little details and subtle styles they use throughout the painting. It's easy to figure out what Pythosblaze meant behind his dragon piece. He likes minerals and dragons so he combined the two and made a whole series of them. I also know where to get photo references, thanks for the advice, but that picture is just gonna stay the way you hate it because it's just a sketch and I like it just the way it is and I have other things to do. I'm glad for the in put. You're right it's rather static. I'll look out for that in future pieces. You're still a giant ass hole. Don't talk to me again please. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to tbonegirl28 [2014-03-23 07:43:05 +0000 UTC]

Oh, don't worry, after that one wall of text I conclude your are indeed an idiot. Please keep they way you are. I swear to all the saints and god in mankind's history that I'll be laughing at whatever thing wrong happens to you which could have been foreseen. Ta-ta!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AJInu-Okami In reply to MakarovJAC [2013-11-26 22:21:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh...my...Buddha... You can't be serious. For starters, she always acknowledge she has flaws. In fact, EVERY artists admits to their flaws. I never met an artists that didn't admit to their flaws including 'famous' artists on DA.

Second, she post this journal because she was confused to see how the fuck you worded yourself. You critique alright until you started treating her as if she has no life other than art, or you're basically saying 'Fuck your family, Fuck your future career, Fuck everything in life except for art. You must do this right until your art is appealing to a blind person.'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakarovJAC In reply to AJInu-Okami [2013-11-26 22:31:54 +0000 UTC]

I repeat, does she works 9-to-5 and 5-to-9? I think I even wrotte that she has complete freedom of studying however she sees fit by not telling her to "study EVERY day/study X hours a week". Also I don't remember telling her to outright "screw your life/etcetera/etcetera/etcetera"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1