HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Logovanni
# Statistics
Favourites: 1268; Deviations: 199; Watchers: 126
Watching: 110; Pageviews: 33482; Comments Made: 11373; Friends: 110
# Comments
Comments: 620
SoriasTail [2016-05-16 19:54:08 +0000 UTC]
Hey, thanks for faving one of my photos of me and adding me to your watch ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
User48 [2014-02-25 01:53:39 +0000 UTC]
Here ya go, the drone that flies unmaned (no one in it or on the ground). The Navy's X47B. It's a third the size of the flying Wing Bomber we have. It can fly 24/7 it refuels in flight, it surveils, recons and Strikes all by stealth. They had problems landing it on a carrier, thats been solved. It only lands if there's mechanical, electrical or computer problems which are monitored by a computer on the ground. February 20th, 2014 the latest GPS satellite went up which is also going to control all of the air traffic over the U.S. (a mistake I think). So this bird is going to be seen by the public in 2018. Make a search to see what you find. I wanted to get this to you sooner but my computer was on the brink of hitting the wall, it has a little more life yet. This thing flies with Guns, Missiles and Bombs and can go anywhere.When do you think it first flew!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to User48 [2014-02-25 05:33:04 +0000 UTC]
Northrop Grumman's X-47B, which the Navy hasn't procured, isn't a combat-capable aircraft, and the one that is operating never will be. It's a tech demonstrator, a hopeful for the Navy's UCLASS RFP. Its budget was slashed and it no longer had a requirement for Autonomous Aerial Refueling (AAR) and that part of the program was never developed, so no, it can't refuel in air. Even if it did it couldn't re-arm itself and there is a lot of maintenance that needs to be done on turbine engines which would limit its ability to stay aloft to about a week, even -with- aerial refueling, which it doesn't have the capability to do. The computer problems are monitored, but it's a human that monitors the computer on the ground that is in contact with the aircraft. The Navy specifically doesn't want an aircraft that is completely autonomous. It doesn't have guns; it has two internal weapon bays that can carry a max of 4,500 lbs of ordinance. The public has already seen this thing; its first flight is well documented on Feb 4, 2011, three years ago.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
User48 In reply to Logovanni [2014-02-26 03:39:56 +0000 UTC]
Maybe I got the name wrong but there's an unmanned aircraft that refuels, is stealth, carries missiles and bombs has guns and will strike where ever and when ever we want, that lands on carriers.
Yes someone monitors the computer but it flies itself. What I seen wasn't a demonstrator or had a turbine. Your knowledge of the real world is above average, try Black Projects where everything else starts that Kills people. What's flying now is always fifty years behind of what we really have like what operates in all mediums,space,air and underwater. Were back to the need to know, Think Bigger. The F-35 is the last manned fighter we will ever make, so if we'er thinking bigger what's next! 2018 we'll see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Logovanni In reply to damselle-xo [2014-02-13 11:09:33 +0000 UTC]
It was so long ago I forgot abput it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
damselle-xo In reply to Logovanni [2014-07-17 19:07:48 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha it's okay, I'm pretty bad at getting back to comments in a timely manner : (
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to damselle-xo [2014-07-18 07:34:30 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha, yeah, no kidding. Hahaha xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Logovanni In reply to FlyWithDamagedWings [2013-12-24 01:16:06 +0000 UTC]
I would like nothing more than to serenade your self-esteem a small bit every day for a year, because seeing you smile is such a sweet reward.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to FlyWithDamagedWings [2013-12-24 01:23:35 +0000 UTC]
Alas you are spoken for, so such a thing is only a fleeting dream.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FlyWithDamagedWings In reply to Logovanni [2013-12-24 03:10:12 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I am spoken for
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to FlyWithDamagedWings [2013-12-24 03:15:18 +0000 UTC]
And much too soon; a great loss.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Toshinden-fanclub [2013-11-16 16:13:31 +0000 UTC]
Hello can i ask you for an request or arttrade or collab???
And would you be ok if the theme is bellydancing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CynthiaCouturier [2013-05-12 03:20:50 +0000 UTC]
Hey thanks 4 the fav follow me on fb too ñ.ñ
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Logovanni In reply to SassyRaptor [2013-02-18 03:51:15 +0000 UTC]
Come wander around my lawn while you do that, the grass is getting dry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to SassyRaptor [2013-03-04 21:57:22 +0000 UTC]
Get your salty tears off my lawn. D<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to SassyRaptor [2013-03-08 16:38:19 +0000 UTC]
That was ages ago. Times change, Mamajama, get with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Demented287 [2013-01-08 23:54:57 +0000 UTC]
Heheh I clicked on "random deviant". That's all
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Demented287 [2013-01-05 08:16:47 +0000 UTC]
Your responses to these things are so out of the ordinary... You seem to me like a pretty funny dude!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to Demented287 [2013-01-08 05:40:09 +0000 UTC]
Oh no, it's you. How did you find me?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
konfusedfae [2012-07-21 05:07:00 +0000 UTC]
Hmm. Checked out your gallery. All I can say is... you've got a long way to go, but hey - not everyone has the art skill.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to ABressanutti [2012-06-17 05:28:03 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Logovanni In reply to 84-29388498905029375 [2012-05-26 02:26:32 +0000 UTC]
Get in line, freako.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
84-29388498905029375 In reply to Logovanni [2012-05-26 02:46:38 +0000 UTC]
but I wanna clit you in the butt
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Logovanni In reply to 84-29388498905029375 [2012-05-26 02:56:52 +0000 UTC]
What what? In the butt?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>