Comments: 6
CageyJay [2016-04-14 03:25:58 +0000 UTC]
Is the spar between the main fuselage and the aft stabilizers really flat, as it appears here? That makes me wonder if it would experience some weird harmonics in atmospheric flight, without additional control surfaces.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wbyrd In reply to CageyJay [2016-04-14 10:18:55 +0000 UTC]
It's more T-shaped than flat, the upper surface is curved, with a reinforcing ridge along the underside you can't see from this angle. Any harmonics would be dealt with by the ships fly by wire computer controlled flight systems.
This particular ship is about the size of an AN-225 heavy lift cargo jet, it's wings and tail are for enhanced performance in an atmosphere, so they don't have to lift the entire weight of the just provide extra aerodynamic control forces. Compared to a conventional aircraft, it would be a bit clumsy when relying completely on aerodynamic flight surfaces alone. Normally it would be receiving most of its lift from Gravitic systems built into the hull. The gravitic systems would be supporting 50-90 percent of its mass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
schizmatic [2016-02-10 10:06:54 +0000 UTC]
I want to make a paper plane version of this and throw it off the porch. I really think it could work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Daemoria [2016-02-09 03:42:00 +0000 UTC]
Looks like a surprisingly spacious and comfortable craft to cruise around in. The only real issue I have with the design might be down to some inherent stability issues from not having a vertical stabilizer. Of course, you can just say it's fly by wire/computer guidance, and avoids those issues, and i'll just shut my fool mouth. :I
👍: 0 ⏩: 1