Comments: 9
BlightBite [2018-06-10 15:24:06 +0000 UTC]
What are the props used for the ivy?
π: 0 β©: 1
TeslaMen In reply to BlightBite [2018-06-10 15:57:14 +0000 UTC]
Mask's pack got them, you can find the pack on facepunch, 21 gigs of scenebuilding goodness.
π: 0 β©: 1
BlightBite In reply to TeslaMen [2018-06-10 17:10:37 +0000 UTC]
Aight, thanks for the help.
π: 0 β©: 0
gold94chica [2017-08-31 02:48:30 +0000 UTC]
Modern day StonehengeΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
Dafuqer7 [2017-08-30 21:50:01 +0000 UTC]
Still better than most modern art.
π: 0 β©: 0
modesskiteer [2017-08-30 21:04:58 +0000 UTC]
The quality is good, and it seems you took some of my criticisms of your previous work to this one. However, it is too simple to critique. In other words, it looks like it has no issues for something so simple. :/
π: 0 β©: 1
XieAngel In reply to modesskiteer [2017-08-31 16:11:16 +0000 UTC]
I fundamentally disagree. If you zoom in, you see that this is a very large scenebuild.
π: 0 β©: 1
modesskiteer In reply to XieAngel [2017-08-31 17:56:43 +0000 UTC]
That is too generic and subjective. Anyone can make a large scenebuild.Β
The devil is in the details.
Also, I noticed that there are some details in this picture that resemble faces, specifically that weird char mark on the 3 large stones. In more detail, it looks like one face in the middle and 2 vein arms. The 4th stone on the floor, I presume are supposed to be the legs. I guess this is a statue that is doing pointing upwards with everything it can.Β
This can work as a focus and detail, but this is still relatively simple. It is just one idea. One scenebuild...
And again...this is too simple to critique because the idea is too clear and the scenebuild is rather simple. The focus is clear and the detailing is nice, but this is me...I critique by sharing feedback on what to make better rather than just compliment, and this just means that I only need to compliment it in the comments.
π: 0 β©: 0