HOME | DD

Helge129 In reply to LEgGOdt1 [2013-04-24 14:25:22 +0000 UTC]

Also there are many twin-engine single-tail planes. EF2k Typhoon, Panavia Tornado, F4 Phantom, F5 Tiger II, just to name a few.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LEgGOdt1 In reply to Helge129 [2013-04-24 14:38:28 +0000 UTC]

But all those fighter's engines were next to each other, and they didn't have a gap between the engines.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tank50us In reply to LEgGOdt1 [2013-04-24 14:20:37 +0000 UTC]

we've been over this with the LAST image.... it is -not- my design. It is a FICTIONAL design that features heavily in s writings. The world can have similar designations for different aircraft and systems. For example, there are two F-4s, the Corsair, and the Phantom. There are two Typhoons, the prop-driven ground attack fighter of the RAF in WW2, and the EF2000 4.5gen fighter. I'm sure in the future, there will be another aircraft to carry the F-14 designation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LEgGOdt1 In reply to Tank50us [2013-04-24 15:05:37 +0000 UTC]

I understand that this jet is comletely fictional. And I agree with you that the Navy should bring back or do a future version of the F-14TOMCAT.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to LEgGOdt1 [2013-04-25 04:20:17 +0000 UTC]

its my design an Shoguneagle do you know what FICTIONAL design means an USAF an navy do rotate numbers for aircraft

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LEgGOdt1 In reply to bagera3005 [2013-04-25 04:46:19 +0000 UTC]

Yes but sometimes when they do that if the number they rotate belonged to a fighter that had such a reptation they'll leave that number alone or in the case with the F-35 Lightning II which was named after the a fighter from WWII called the P-38 Lightning, and also when the Air Force was looking for a new air suppearotiy fighter they given were two designs And the manufactures built there jets and offered the AirForce the XF-17 and the XF-16. XF-17 was a twin engine fighter and the XF-16 was a signle engine fighter. And when all the testing was completed the AirForce went with the XF-16 which is now the F-16 FightingFalcon. and the XF-17 was put into a museam only to be pulled out and given new and more powerful engines and was renamed the F-18 Hornet which now service as the Navy's primary fighter. and my dad when he still worked for Bowing help build the F-18G Grawler and was on the team that went with the Grawler for the final sea trials and I got to see pictures of it "WAY!!!!!!!!" before the Navy even unvailed it to the public, when the F-18G was still Classified.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to LEgGOdt1 [2013-04-25 05:10:55 +0000 UTC]

i know i study aircraft history i suggest you do even more an number was picked by Shoguneagle i designed the bird to his spaces as asked backing down on starting argument is good idea your out gunned

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LEgGOdt1 In reply to bagera3005 [2013-04-25 14:17:00 +0000 UTC]

Very will I can see that I'm fighting a losing battle here so I'll amit defeat. But I still stand by what I said earlier, and by the way, I like that picture that you got on your page of the Aurora that the US AirForce denies that aircraft doesn't excests.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to LEgGOdt1 [2013-04-25 15:03:14 +0000 UTC]

thanks an if they told you truth you would not be posting here

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LEgGOdt1 In reply to bagera3005 [2013-04-25 19:47:02 +0000 UTC]

You're Welcome and true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0