HOME | DD
T-Domesticus β Intraoral Integument Guide
#dinosaur #dinosaurs #tyrannosaurus #anatomy #integument #theropod #trex #tyrannosaurusrex
Published: 2018-10-16 08:16:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 12841; Favourites: 352; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
If you plan on restoring a dinosaur's facial integument a certain way, here's a handy little tool for you on which oral coverage corresponds with which jaw muscle coverage, because I see people get this wrong a lot.This isn't necessarily a be-all end-all guideline for every species, obviously there will be some outliers and morphological variation, this is just a rough guideline for general trends seen in sauropsid anatomy.
Note: I used Tyrannosaurus for demonstrative purposes only, in actuality Model 1 would have been the most likely oral coverage for several reasons.
Edit: Here is a more updated version I made! twitter.com/domesticus1/statusβ¦
Related content
Comments: 39
π: 0 β©: 0
this is amazing
love the comparison between the 3
π: 0 β©: 0
Option 2 is most likely as it is supported by science
π: 0 β©: 0
"....in actuality Model 1 would have been the most likely oral coverage for several reasons."
Please elaborate a little more, for our sake. What are the "several reasons"? I think you should be a little more specific when discussing highly controversial and open-ended scientific subjects -- especially when you're comments show a sharp and evident preference to one side of the discussion. (BTW I am impartial in the discussion of Tyrannosaur oral tissue)
π: 0 β©: 1
Here are the main ones
markwitton-com.blogspot.com/20β¦
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, thank you. I've seen this before. I was just suggesting that you make your descriptions a little more specific. Thank you for the attention to comments tho.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not the artist, but no problem anyway π€£
π: 0 β©: 0
*most likely of said options
Β Itβs entirely possible they spotted something different to all the above groups, though you do mention variation, so at least youβre aware.
π: 0 β©: 0
I noticed that most lepidosaurs have their teeth covered by gums. Do you think that would've been the case with many extinct reptiles, including theropods?
π: 1 β©: 1
Most probably yes. In some animals large teeth remain hard to spot even in open mouths thanks to lips, cheeks, gums and tongues overwhelming them in soft tissue. The same might have been true for ancient animals (Witton 2018).
π: 1 β©: 0
Number 1 all the way baby, miss me with that 'reconstructions based on extremely derived reptiles' bs.
π: 2 β©: 1
What do you mean he defy logic when you're the one arguing that snakes aren't reptiles??
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
You said "you can't deny that snakes and monitors aren't reptiles" just before!!! And then in this tweet even you just said that "snakes aren't reptiles"!!! You cannot pull the wool over my eyes!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
It is you that cannot read! Of the two of us I am the better reader, I am very good at reading. You cannot change the history from what has been said and done and deceive the world. Snakes are reptiles. Deal with it!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
It says edited just on this post you made! You edit your comments! You can pretend to believe snakes are reptiles now but you showed me your true colors already and I will remove your mask of deception for the whole world to see!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Now you're trying to find my age like a creepy stalker, just because you don't know what a snake is!!! I will not be prey to a lying, comment editing predator!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
You're speaking as if archosaurs aren't the poster children of extreme derivatives. And speaking of preferential treatment for aesthetics, why on earth would a large, terrestrial theropod feature an extreme lack of tissue that's evolved as an adaptation to a largely aquatic lifestyle, if not for the pursuit of aesthetics and a lackluster, furthermore lazy attempt at showing off the facial anatomy of an extinct creature. I've heard certain 'professional' individuals refer to reconstructions with actually plausible facial tissue as 'doofy', which speaks volumes to the aesthetic preferences over the pursuit of honest science.
π: 3 β©: 1
I'm at a loss for the logical reaches you're making. This dribble is incredibly tiresome, you're clearly rooted in whatever logic you wish to adhere to, and for someone on an art website, you've contributed nothing to it.
π: 1 β©: 1
going off the responses to these hidden coments i'm going to guess you were replying to that prick JPGuchiha?
if i am incorrect then i am sorry for assuming
but if i AM correct then just remember to just block him and spread the word, that guy's a TOTAL dick head
π: 1 β©: 0
r-heinhart don't even listen to this guy, he doesn't think that snakes are reptiles, he is a fool!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
You edit all of your comments!!! I be waiting here until you stop lying to everyone in whole world about your incorrect taxonomy belief!!! The truth is on my side!!! You will wait forever because of your lie!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
No you lie about that! Just like you lied about the snake reptile! If by meaningful content you mean "LIES" then I agree that you lied!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
You edited this comment too!!! You can't stop lying!!! Also that screenshot is photoshopped nice try
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
NO you think it's joke because I defeated you
π: 0 β©: 2
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
OK let me get this straight -- first you tell me that snake is reptile, then you ask for my age and hit on me, and then you try and pretend it was all a joke to escape responsibility for your actions, and now you will block me!!! This is the absurdity of a person who has been driven insane by defeat!!! You lack logic!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
I admit my mistake...
NOT!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Ok I went back and read it, and you definitely said that snakes aren't repticles and then edited it!!! You cannot play me for the fool!!! It is ok to admit your mistake you know
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
No I don't know that because you edited the part that says 'edited' out of the post so it doesn't look like it's edited even though it is edited, you are deceitful!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
It's too late I've already reported you for spamming lies and saying that snakes aren't reptiles!!! Truth (me) is victorious against lie (you)!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
I only just skimmed this. Why are you arguing that snakes and lizard aren't reptiles? All squamates are indeed reptiles.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
You wrote the same thing twice!!!! You are so illogical!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>