HOME | DD

SRegan — FATM Char Work - Yisrayl

Published: 2005-05-21 16:40:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 404; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description I think something went a bit wrong with the bottom of the cloak I was quite pleased with the folds around the arms, though, as well as the mountain range.
Related content
Comments: 6

FinalSage [2005-05-21 18:49:23 +0000 UTC]

Very nice, though the cloak seems to be a solid material. you should but an area where it folds back to allow the arms through, other than that it's perfect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SRegan In reply to FinalSage [2005-05-21 19:01:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comment. Yes, it does look a bit solid, I'm afraid I tried to get across the impression that the cloak was harshly whipping across the picture in a strong wind, and the way it's fastened (on the left side, right side as we look at it) means the opening for the arms would be sideways on to the 'camera'. In retrospect, I should have rotated the entire pose through about 45 degrees to reveal the opening, or at least made the far side of the cloak darker so it doesn't look like one big seamless surface. Oh well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FinalSage In reply to SRegan [2005-05-22 22:01:43 +0000 UTC]

nice none the less, good work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheMonkeyKingOfOld [2005-05-21 17:36:58 +0000 UTC]

the picture wont load fully. i only saw down to the bottom of his sword arm but its looking cool. like the facial expression.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SRegan In reply to TheMonkeyKingOfOld [2005-05-21 18:48:54 +0000 UTC]

I've uploaded it in .jpg format instead of .png, and that seems to have fixed the problem. I realised halfway through the upload that it wouldn't work properly because it was 3.6 megabytes, but I had to wait for someone to leave a comment before I could fix it, because I didn't know where it was or its http:// address. DA is apparently taking about 12 hours to update the 'gallery' and 'recent deviation' pages, and I cancelled the transfer before it got to stage 4 and showed me the link (bah - I've just realised I could have used the Featured Deviation to get a link to it, because it shows up there). Anyway, thanks for your comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheMonkeyKingOfOld In reply to SRegan [2005-05-21 18:59:30 +0000 UTC]

LOL no problem dude

👍: 0 ⏩: 0