Comments: 28
That-Random--Artist In reply to SkarValidus [2011-05-03 01:08:53 +0000 UTC]
your welcome!
I can't believe I missed it! I thought I went through your gallery thoroughly O.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vandervals [2011-03-27 22:11:03 +0000 UTC]
hey the full view of this really surprised me! good work!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Griatch-art [2011-02-07 04:56:11 +0000 UTC]
One can tell a lot of work went into this. The little touches, such as the small streams among the rocks, add to the impression. The muted tones does indeed, as another viewer suggested, make this suitable for a postcard or Alaskan commercial.
I don't have any critique for the nature painting itself, it looks beautiful. Only suggestion is one I've often gotten myself in the past and these days try to do with all my own landscapes: include some sort of event happening in them. It could still be very peaceful, like a group of deer grazing, a wanderer having stopped to drink, or an eagle perched on a rock (in small scale, obviously). I've found it helps the viewers eye if there is some sort of focus like that, establishing a moment in time. Just my personal experience, maybe worth trying.
.
Griatch
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MakeLoveNotPosters [2011-02-03 21:37:35 +0000 UTC]
When it comes to landscape pieces, I prefer programmatic titles. There's something more...I dunno...I just like the feel of programmatic titles more in this context.
Anyway, I vaguely remember you showing me the skeleton of this painting ages ago on skype I believe it was.
And it looks just fantastic! There is a surprising and awesome amount of detail. Your technique is really improving, and I like that. I can't wait to see you breaking out the slim toothpicks to paint on individual hairs. Ahahaha.
My only real criticism of this work is perhaps I feel a little awkward about the perspective of the lake in reference to the rest of the scenery. But again Corbin, this is how the kids say "Errr... L-l-l-egit!"
(I mean, of course, fantastic.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SkarValidus In reply to MakeLoveNotPosters [2011-02-04 00:59:58 +0000 UTC]
What do you mean by programmatic? If you could provide an example that would be rather helpful - would maybe spark my imagination to find a REAL title.
Yes, the original sketch had a stream running down the valley instead of a lake, and was lacking in both cloud details and foreground. I like this much better. As for the detail, it's actually not all that detailed. One must hold one's hands out to four feet and remember that this is the size of the painting. So in real life, it's much more impressionist when it comes to the trees, bushes, and clouds. But if the illusion of detail is there, I've accomplished my purpose.
I like the perspective fine. I think I drew a lot of the rocky formations sort of slanting backward, implying a more square perspective than I really intended, and that may be the source of awkward in the painting.
Thanks for the kind words and helpful thoughts!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SkarValidus In reply to MakeLoveNotPosters [2011-03-11 06:01:12 +0000 UTC]
I see. I had at first decided to do this, but I think that a fun, somewhat random title is even more interesting, without actually detracting from the merit of the art.
I miss you, too...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Marikobard [2011-02-01 11:44:51 +0000 UTC]
wonderful concept and lovely details
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
magpiesmiscellany [2011-01-26 00:44:59 +0000 UTC]
I can see hudson river school in this. I think I'd prefer slightly more saturated tones or a bit more of a focal point, but it looks lovely. Is it based on a real place at all? Someting about the far side of the water looks a little off to me, but I can't put my finger on what is niggling me. I love how you scatter the trees. You do a nice job of getting an even but not too artificial shaping and placement, which always seems to be an issue for me when I'm brave enough to try a landscape.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SkarValidus In reply to magpiesmiscellany [2011-01-26 02:12:15 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for such a great comment! I'm not so good at picking colours =/. I had considered a more concrete focal point, but decided that would be overwhelming, though perhaps I should have worked one into my plans... I'm glad it looks natural, as that's typically a big hurdle for me, too!
Again, thanks for your advice and thoughts!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Martywolf92 [2011-01-15 06:04:00 +0000 UTC]
WOW! I love this. You should look at the artist... Eugene Von Guerard, if you havent already. His landscape paintings are magnificent!!! My fav artist!! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SkarValidus In reply to Martywolf92 [2011-01-16 05:10:06 +0000 UTC]
Grrr, the Internet ate my reply.
Yes, Mr Von Guerard is wonderful. Did I mention I love Romatic realists? You may want to check out Thomas Cole, The Hudson River School (his posse of artists), and Fred Buchwitz. Also some very inspirational guys!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gaiala1 [2011-01-14 23:26:48 +0000 UTC]
it's beautiful! it looks like it should be the picture of a post card from alaska! no, really you captured the beauty of the wilderness in this painting
👍: 0 ⏩: 1