Comments: 12
HollyRoseBriar [2018-05-01 16:15:35 +0000 UTC]
Brooklyn!! C:
It's interesting how you textured his beak like a beak and not a maw
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SirGryphon In reply to HollyRoseBriar [2018-05-01 16:45:45 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I figured his beak was more birdlike and hard and less scaly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HollyRoseBriar In reply to SirGryphon [2018-05-01 17:04:14 +0000 UTC]
From looking at it in the show, it always seemed to me that it acted more like a maw than a beak. I always wondered if that was what it was supposed to be or if animators were like "nope, a maw is more expressive than a beak, so it's a maw"
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
SirGryphon In reply to HollyRoseBriar [2018-05-01 17:07:52 +0000 UTC]
What are the distinct differences between a maw and a beak?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HollyRoseBriar In reply to SirGryphon [2018-05-01 17:38:42 +0000 UTC]
Well, to my mind a beak is something hard with the only fleshy bits being on the inside, and a maw is made out of flesh (with bone underneath, of course).
Brooklyn clearly has lips, so I don't know why they call his face a beak rather than a maw. Maybe they're going by where his nose is located? On beaks the nose holes tend to be closer to the eyes and on maws the nose is usually on the end of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SirGryphon In reply to HollyRoseBriar [2018-05-01 19:50:09 +0000 UTC]
Mawsome! Yeah I guess it would be more of a maw. After all chickens don't have l lips.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SirGryphon In reply to MissUnashamed [2018-05-01 04:38:39 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! All these different portraits i've been doing has helped figure out lighting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0