ozzajw [2004-09-24 05:58:46 +0000 UTC]
What's this? an artist! You'll probably find out soon enough what i mean by that.
Lovely piece, but in all it's splendour there are still flaws that are irritating to the eye (not as bad as acid is though mind you):
The Rainbow has a sharp curve in it where i presume you pentooled lower than the critical spherical angle- To remedy this you could recreate the rainbom with circles inside circles, cutting away preceding circles so you get perfectly dimensioned, circular rings, then cut off the bottom half, and perspective the paths to the desired point, then apply the colours.
Also i'm not so sure the mesh background is appropriate, as meshes like that don't occur in nature, and in a piece solely about nature why use inorganic , rigid shapes? It just lessens the effect IMO.
Finally, In my own personal view nature's art is far more than just rainbows, clouds and rain- landscapes, mountains e.t.c are also "nature's art". Perhaps including others would make the piece too clutterred, but a quick, but not shabby, fix for it would be to call it soemthing like "Beauty of the Sky" or somethign makign it specific to the splendours that occur in the sky.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1