HOME | DD

scuzzo β€” Hardcore

Published: 2009-01-13 15:54:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 81321; Favourites: 2986; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description English
No way, it's just a pair of hands.

EspaΓ±ol
De ninguna manera, es sΓ³lo un par de manos.

Illustrator
Related content
Comments: 1381

scuzzo In reply to ??? [2009-01-22 18:16:04 +0000 UTC]

yup, sorry

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mikkichic In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 18:26:37 +0000 UTC]

oh well

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

madshutterbug [2009-01-22 14:53:32 +0000 UTC]

How lame! That comment
on two hands, mature content?
Someone needs humour...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to madshutterbug [2009-01-22 17:55:49 +0000 UTC]

nope, not that one, the "naked" robot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madshutterbug In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 18:25:50 +0000 UTC]

Darn! I never saw the naked robot! I faved the two hands.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to madshutterbug [2009-01-22 18:45:16 +0000 UTC]

enjoy: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Dioma In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 18:55:02 +0000 UTC]

They call that mature content and all the lesbian action and vaginas in "Artistic Nude" art? Awesome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

madshutterbug In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 18:51:01 +0000 UTC]

LOL! That is a humourous robot! I laugh, I do not object! ΒΏSe puede bailar, la robusteza?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to madshutterbug [2009-01-22 18:53:12 +0000 UTC]

"she" dances, but pay in advance

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Naixoa In reply to ??? [2009-01-22 10:51:53 +0000 UTC]

Get over it man. You're not the only person who hasn't read the rules and had things taken down.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to Naixoa [2009-01-22 13:05:25 +0000 UTC]

I've read the rules, and when it comes to "nudity" or "ideologically sensitive" they're pretty stupid

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Naixoa In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 19:57:29 +0000 UTC]

But then surely you understand. This is a website that 13 year olds roam around. I wouldn't want my kids (if I had any) looking at nudeys, tits/nipples, explicit stuff, gore, etc (not that you did gore, just throwing that in there). Nipples are explicit - which is why you don't see girls walking around topless everywhere.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

LynnSnow In reply to Naixoa [2009-01-23 04:22:39 +0000 UTC]

I suppose you're also against them taking all their clothes off to get in the shower (For shame, they'd see their own body parts!) or babies being breast-fed.

Augh.

Sorry, don't mean to be a douche here. I gotta vent it somewhere. Hope you don't take it personally.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Naixoa In reply to LynnSnow [2009-01-28 19:24:35 +0000 UTC]

Lol I don't take it personally don't worry.
And thats a completely different context.
Thats like saying HOW CAN YOU LET YOUR KIDS GO TO SCHOOL WHEN THERE ARE WARS GOING ON IN THE MIDDLE EAST!?
Y'know? Its unrelated (well slightly more related than the point I just made).
I wouldn't want kids seeing OTHER PEOPLE's nudey parts on an innocent website. Some of the vulgar stuff people attempt to post here is honestly disgusting. You wouldn't believe it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

scuzzo In reply to Naixoa [2009-01-22 20:07:41 +0000 UTC]

I do have two daughters, trust me, nipples don't screw kids' minds, then again, it's my personal opinion. Anyone can think what they like, that's why, since I dont share DA's way of labeling things I'm leaving.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Naixoa In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 20:33:25 +0000 UTC]

Aaaaah well thats fair enough

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SarahJPhotography [2009-01-22 06:38:28 +0000 UTC]

You should have labeled it as mature content or just ignored the notes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to SarahJPhotography [2009-01-22 12:56:24 +0000 UTC]

they deleted 2 of my deviations, I can't ignore that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MissShortie [2009-01-22 06:31:45 +0000 UTC]

you know what?
That really sucks >:

This was one of my favorite deviations...
and it wasn't even bad!!

Besides, there are FAR worse things on here than your art

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to MissShortie [2009-01-22 12:55:09 +0000 UTC]

I don't judge the work of others (because I don't like being judged), but I also don't like being banned

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Manacim [2009-01-22 06:13:05 +0000 UTC]

all i gotta say is fuck those haters. that was a fine art with a humerous metaphor.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to Manacim [2009-01-22 12:54:07 +0000 UTC]

As long as DA pays more attention to them than to people submitting art I don't wanna be part of this community

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Manacim In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-23 01:06:53 +0000 UTC]

i see

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

punch3numb [2009-01-22 04:41:13 +0000 UTC]

hey me parece que fue una estupides de parte de las personas que te hicieron quitar tu ilustracion a mi me parecio bastante buena la creatividad que tubiste para representar tu concepto lastima que hay mucha gente de mente cerrada y de poco criterio que no logra entender lo que realmente significa arte, lastima amigo , pero siempre va a tener mi fav por que logre ver la ilustracion (Y)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to punch3numb [2009-01-22 12:53:27 +0000 UTC]

muchas gracias, lo ΓΊnico que voy a extraΓ±ar son los comentarios de la gente (buenos y malos), pero no quiero "apoyar" la polΓ­tica de DA con mi presencia

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

punch3numb In reply to scuzzo [2009-02-07 02:19:52 +0000 UTC]

Si, que mal lastima por que la verdad no logro entender como es que si permiten fotografia de desnudos no pueden permitir tus ilustraciones lastima amigo pero tene en cuenta que aunque aparesca esa imagen siempre sera mi fav por q me gusto mucho, lastima que una pagina donde se supone nos apoyan a expresarno a la vez nos quieran callar pero ni modo suerte con todo (Y)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mason111 In reply to ??? [2009-01-22 03:40:51 +0000 UTC]

what was it that was so bad?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to mason111 [2009-01-22 03:47:10 +0000 UTC]

the lack of communication, when someone reported my art I didn't get a chance to do a thing, I got tired of that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mason111 In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 03:50:22 +0000 UTC]

no i mean what was the picture that someone thought was so bad.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to mason111 [2009-01-22 03:51:43 +0000 UTC]

I don't know

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lesh4537 [2009-01-22 03:16:41 +0000 UTC]

OH MAN!! I really enjoyed what you use to have there! It alway takes a small few to ruin it for everyone else. WAY TO GO, JERKS!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to Lesh4537 [2009-01-22 03:36:34 +0000 UTC]

I liked my gallery very much, it was hours and hours of work, but they don't deserve it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lesh4537 In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 19:34:24 +0000 UTC]

Well, I apologize for the mass stupidity of others. Even if they don't agree with your work, it should still be appreciated for what it is...art.

Next thing you know, they will want a mature tag on a picture of my dog because you can see his dick.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to Lesh4537 [2009-01-22 20:08:24 +0000 UTC]

be careful with that! hahahaha

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lesh4537 In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-23 02:41:21 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that would be my lucky. Maybe I should blur those parts out...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DetroitDeadSled [2009-01-22 00:41:24 +0000 UTC]

That's retarded!!!!! it was brilliant and hilarious. I thought the whole point to a site like this was to be UNcensored? Bah.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to DetroitDeadSled [2009-01-22 03:22:10 +0000 UTC]

I thought freedom of speech also included art, not here

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DetroitDeadSled In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 04:42:11 +0000 UTC]

That upsets me like you wouldn't believe. Not to sound petty (or an equally improper word) but would it be possibly for me to procure a JPG of the original piece at some point? I absolutely adore it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to DetroitDeadSled [2009-01-22 13:17:37 +0000 UTC]

Maybe I'll post in my blog these days

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

firexcrotch91 In reply to ??? [2009-01-22 00:13:31 +0000 UTC]

Bring it back! You got a DD for it. The majority of the community liked it. There is always going to be people who don't like you or your work. But there are going to be others that love it. Just ignore the fools who don't like it. It was hilarious.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to firexcrotch91 [2009-01-22 03:19:41 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't care if there were people hating my work, I care that DA listens to them and takes actions depending on some idiot without even letting me change and/or "defend" my work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

firexcrotch91 In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-22 13:06:33 +0000 UTC]

Wow. I would hate to have that happen to me. Sorry it did though. I loved it, wish you could have kept it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tiger-wolf In reply to ??? [2009-01-22 00:02:22 +0000 UTC]

You shouldn't have bent and folded to that jerk :c Juse because he didn't like you/the piece didn't mean we didn't!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

scuzzo In reply to tiger-wolf [2009-01-22 03:17:57 +0000 UTC]

I did it because DA didn't even ask me or give me a chance to "defend" my work, they just erased it. And I can't stand that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tiger-wolf In reply to tiger-wolf [2009-01-22 00:02:50 +0000 UTC]

*just, lawl

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Neartastic In reply to ??? [2009-01-21 23:23:43 +0000 UTC]

Sad, that picture was amazing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to Neartastic [2009-01-21 23:27:30 +0000 UTC]

I had better things in my gallery, but that was the most popular

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Neartastic In reply to scuzzo [2009-01-21 23:28:38 +0000 UTC]

It was a funny picture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aleyn In reply to ??? [2009-01-21 22:36:34 +0000 UTC]

This qualifies as yet another million points lost for faith in humanity, or at least our society.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scuzzo In reply to Aleyn [2009-01-21 23:06:04 +0000 UTC]

nah, that's too much to say

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>