Comments: 30
scaber In reply to wytrvn [2008-02-25 08:04:28 +0000 UTC]
I t sure does. Oh well, I guess that it had better stay. Maybe I will try a recrop and UL that as well
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
scaber In reply to wytrvn [2008-02-27 17:21:24 +0000 UTC]
It's interesting how others react to your photographs. I think that sometimes it's caused by the fact that we are too close or too emotionally involved with our photographs and are therefore less able to be so subjective in our assessment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
malte06 [2008-02-23 09:34:33 +0000 UTC]
I like it...fav
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sputnikpixel [2008-02-19 21:36:37 +0000 UTC]
It's great in my opinion, no need to crop anything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fjordian [2008-02-19 19:03:48 +0000 UTC]
I think it's a brilliant capture. Works fine just the way it is.
Yan
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fjordian In reply to scaber [2008-02-27 23:19:09 +0000 UTC]
No problem. Always a pleasure to view your extraordinary images.
Yan
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jvdgoor [2008-02-19 14:16:27 +0000 UTC]
Would it be an idea to crop it, and make it a square? In that case I think I would remove a large portion of the left yellow part, and a little on the right hand side, leaving the height as it is. Just a suggestion....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
scaber In reply to jvdgoor [2008-02-25 08:27:05 +0000 UTC]
You could well be right. I seem to have an aversion for making my photographs square and will do almost anything to avoid it. Maybe I need therapy!!
Perhaps I should try making square photos as a way of expanding my vision.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Images-Sensual [2008-02-19 12:14:22 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps I'm just odd but though I like it I would like it more without the lamps and two brackets. It proportions and colours work for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Images-Sensual In reply to scaber [2008-02-25 09:16:45 +0000 UTC]
But you took the picture so what you see as being right is right otherwise you would have taken it in another way. You took it so I feel that it's your point of view that matters.
I was only commenting on the image as I saw it but you were displaying both the image and the feelings of the whole scene (which only you saw) from which you isolated the image.
I suppose that as far as the brackets etc are concerned it is about if the image is to be a representation of what was there or manipulating what was there and not improving on it but changing it to become a graphic rather than documentary image.
However you work and however you see your images you have a great eye for shape, colours and contrast that I wish I had but probably never will.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
scaber In reply to Images-Sensual [2008-02-25 09:40:51 +0000 UTC]
Good comment, thanks. As for my 'eye', I think that this does improve with practice. I spent the weekend with a well respected Korean artist and was most surprised at what he noticed where I had seen nothing! Most humbling.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Images-Sensual In reply to scaber [2008-02-25 10:58:35 +0000 UTC]
Yes I know what you are saying. It's also very much about good artists taking time and looking with their eyes and average photographers looking with their lenses. The artists are looking to visually explore an object then record it on the seen and unseen level which gives so much more depth, emotion and personal insight. An average photographer points, shoots and hopes for the best in too many cases and I suppose that the new faster digital cameras have a lot to be blamed for in that respect. Take a thousand pictures without having to think and then hope one or two are worth posting. I have felt that your work is like a few (very few) others on this site as being the work of someone who looks as an artist then uses the camera to produce the image in a skilled and educated way. I feel from looking at it that you have a background in art training and then went into photography.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1