Comments: 42
Bandit83 [2008-11-27 22:29:59 +0000 UTC]
Is this one of these fishes, which can blow up their body?
Looks cool. Especially these hairy looking things on his skin.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladybard96 [2008-10-30 17:11:45 +0000 UTC]
Great shot, pufferfish are so cute!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jchsoad [2008-10-30 03:19:25 +0000 UTC]
that's excellent, he looks wicked. the focus is great, you can barely make out the back of the tank.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Roland3791 In reply to jchsoad [2008-10-30 03:23:48 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Josh, I really appreciate it. I just still wish he had puffed up, but oh well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jchsoad In reply to Roland3791 [2008-11-01 03:03:00 +0000 UTC]
animals are hard to predict man, even the little ones.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zufalls-foto [2008-10-30 01:45:21 +0000 UTC]
It turned out quite well, nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Roland3791 In reply to guality [2008-10-29 13:28:22 +0000 UTC]
I didn't need a polarizer for this one, as the inside of the aquarium was very dark, and i didn't get much reflection, bit for anything outside i find that a polarizer can sure save a shot from that annoying glass reflection. I also like what a polarizer can do for the sky, and for saturation of colors when its bright out.
I have some other shots from behind glass, and sometimes you can still see a bit of reflection, so the polarizer can't do it all, but it can sure help on glass, and water.
And thank you, I'm glad you liked this shot, i was hoping he would puff up for me, but this is one laid back puffer i think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Roland3791 In reply to guality [2008-10-29 14:53:27 +0000 UTC]
Well... let me ask this about the tripod. Are you looking for something totally solid to take your phots on, such as long exposure, or self portrait shots, or are you just looking for some extra stability when you are out shooting?
I have both a tri and a mono pod. I find that i use the mono almost all the time unless i'm going for a long exposure. The mono works great in zoo's, since its not overly bulky and doesn't really get in the way. But I will admit that it isn't great for anything less that 1/4 of a second, it still gets blurred... course that could be because my hands shake way to much. Depending on what your plans are, you may look at the mono instead, but i'm not sure its any cheaper, so perhaps a good tri is going to be a bit less expensive.
And I have no idea why you would want my adivce, since i think your shots are better than mine, i feel i should be coming to you for adivce on stuff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
guality In reply to Roland3791 [2008-10-30 12:05:50 +0000 UTC]
For the last couple of months I find myself standing in a good spot to take a photo, thinking "where could I put my camera on?". I'd love to do long water or fog exposure shots, night shooting and macro without relying on bridges and big stones
I think a monopod will be great when time is limited or motives are moving, or as you said, in crowded situations. Right now, I need something to get good macro shots, but soon I will figure out that's too heavy to carry everywhere, so a mono will come in handy
You won't believe it but I am a total beginner in DSLR photography, I started taking pictures again in January this year with our new family bridge camera and was soon hooked up to buy my pentax k200d in August. I must admit that I had a Minolta SLR 10years ago, but I only was playing around.
I submitted two pieces to Mikes progress competition, we'll see. It certainly scared me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Roland3791 In reply to SilverVulpine [2008-10-29 03:57:13 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much my friend, i really appreciate all the support.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LeashaAHooker [2008-10-29 03:33:18 +0000 UTC]
That's cool! Great capture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1