HOME | DD

RaVeNuS9 β€” Herr Freud

Published: 2008-12-19 04:05:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 1637; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description What is your diag-nonsense,
Herr doctor,
Herr Psycho-anal-itic masturbating prick?
Related content
Comments: 68

RaVeNuS9 In reply to ??? [2008-12-20 00:34:08 +0000 UTC]

Same here!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FrodoPrime [2008-12-19 14:25:26 +0000 UTC]

suggestive phallic looking image - distorted to resurrect the Freud in all of us

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to FrodoPrime [2008-12-19 21:27:28 +0000 UTC]

The bastard shall never die!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FrodoPrime In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 22:21:52 +0000 UTC]

once published - they live on - especially if they hit a cord

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to FrodoPrime [2008-12-19 22:26:01 +0000 UTC]

They hit a cord - and broke the whole instrument.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FrodoPrime In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 23:03:25 +0000 UTC]

yes - it was dissonant but caused resonance

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Izaaaaa In reply to FrodoPrime [2008-12-20 00:30:11 +0000 UTC]

Hey that's well said!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FrodoPrime In reply to Izaaaaa [2008-12-20 01:16:55 +0000 UTC]

thanks - it took me a minute to get the right words

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RaVeNuS9 In reply to FrodoPrime [2008-12-19 23:13:52 +0000 UTC]

Man is dissonant by nature, so it was natural.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rikochet [2008-12-19 11:14:27 +0000 UTC]

On the outside
grows the furside
on the inside
grows the skinside
so the furside
is the outside
and the skinside
is the inside
oneside likes the
skinside inside
and the furside
on the outside
others like the
skinside outside
and the furside
on the inside
if you turn the
skinside inside
thinking you will
side with that
side then the
softside fursides
inside which
some argue is
the wrong side
if you turn the
furside outside
as you say it
grows on that side
then your outsides
next to skinside
which becomforts
not the right side

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rikochet [2008-12-19 21:30:13 +0000 UTC]

I would say "Exactly!" but you need to elaborate further..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rikochet In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 21:37:38 +0000 UTC]

ahem, just lyrics by a genious. thought it fitted with the abstract of the image.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rikochet [2008-12-19 21:54:05 +0000 UTC]

Who's this genius?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rikochet In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 22:01:13 +0000 UTC]

scott walker. i'd suggest you check him out. πάΡι στις φωτογραφίΡς σου.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rikochet [2008-12-19 22:09:32 +0000 UTC]

Poly kalos ontws.. Mou thymizei Nick Cave.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

visionart [2008-12-19 06:14:13 +0000 UTC]

Yikes!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to visionart [2008-12-19 06:22:39 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

visionart In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 06:24:50 +0000 UTC]

Yes?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to visionart [2008-12-19 06:36:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mr-Tetanus [2008-12-19 04:21:44 +0000 UTC]

a squatting nude figure from the back, head bowed, slightly compressed horizontally.
It wants me want to french kiss my sister.

Is that bad?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Mr-Tetanus [2008-12-19 04:26:00 +0000 UTC]

On the contrary..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mr-Tetanus In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 04:51:52 +0000 UTC]

That's what she says. She reckons it's OK, as long as I finish what I start.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Mr-Tetanus [2008-12-19 04:52:55 +0000 UTC]

Always finish what you start, otherwise you'll make a sad sad ghost.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mr-Tetanus In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 05:57:43 +0000 UTC]

I made a sad ghost out of glow in the dark putty once. I still have it somewhere, but there's a lot of dust stuck to it, and it doesn't glow as well as it used to.
Like me, it's getting old.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Mr-Tetanus [2008-12-19 06:00:48 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DeadVenusBlue [2008-12-19 04:18:02 +0000 UTC]

Rather phallic.
Freud is too simplistic for me.

Sex this, incest fantasy that...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to DeadVenusBlue [2008-12-19 04:19:10 +0000 UTC]

Fuck Freud! He was too sexually right to be true!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rubius In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 04:58:30 +0000 UTC]

What do you mean?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rubius [2008-12-19 05:03:09 +0000 UTC]

Unfortunately enough not everyone is overpowered by sexual urges -And this, excluding any possible repression of them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rubius In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 05:04:53 +0000 UTC]

What else are people motivated by?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rubius [2008-12-19 05:06:10 +0000 UTC]

Death.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Izaaaaa In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-20 00:28:31 +0000 UTC]

Freud talked about it too. Eros and Thanatos.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Izaaaaa [2008-12-20 00:34:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rubius In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 05:07:28 +0000 UTC]

TouchΓ©.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rubius [2008-12-19 05:07:52 +0000 UTC]

Naturally.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rubius In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 05:08:37 +0000 UTC]

Somehow it slipped my mind..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rubius [2008-12-19 05:09:28 +0000 UTC]

What did?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rubius In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-19 05:10:03 +0000 UTC]

Death

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Rubius [2008-12-19 05:13:00 +0000 UTC]

Alright

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Soyskin [2008-12-19 04:07:24 +0000 UTC]

i dont understand this picture....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to Soyskin [2008-12-19 04:08:36 +0000 UTC]

What do you see?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

DominikKucera In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-21 20:10:26 +0000 UTC]

Who are you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to DominikKucera [2008-12-21 20:18:16 +0000 UTC]

Where do we come from?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DominikKucera In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-21 20:30:14 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to DominikKucera [2008-12-21 20:36:53 +0000 UTC]

What's this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DominikKucera In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-21 21:05:19 +0000 UTC]

I saw that comment, writen by Nobody, on second page of comments in this deviantion... have no idea what it means...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to DominikKucera [2008-12-21 21:07:45 +0000 UTC]

"The psychopathology of psychoanalysts."

Is that it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

DominikKucera In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-21 21:43:47 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RaVeNuS9 In reply to DominikKucera [2008-12-21 21:45:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DominikKucera In reply to RaVeNuS9 [2008-12-21 21:42:46 +0000 UTC]

no, take a look at the picture I uploaded... there is a comment writen by "Nobody!"

Am I hallucinating?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2


| Next =>