Comments: 206
Quilaviper In reply to ??? [2018-03-24 06:22:04 +0000 UTC]
A. A TITLE WE WEAR WITH PRIDE
B. YEEEAAAH, YOU'LL PROBABLY HATE HIM
AND THEN LOVE HIM AGAIN
OR MAYBE FEEL VERY CONFLICTED ABOUT HIM
I LOVE HIM, ANYWAY
C. HELL YEAH SHE IS
π: 0 β©: 1
JawsomeFTW In reply to Quilaviper [2018-03-24 23:41:15 +0000 UTC]
A. FUCK YEAH THEY FUCKING WEAR THAT FUCKING TITLE WITH MOTHERFUCKING PRIDE
MORTHERFUCKING UNFUCKABLES, BABY!
B. I DONT CARE ABOUT THEN NOW I LOVE HIM ITS TOO BAD HE'S PROBABLY ARO ACE
C. "Asexual as fuck" Perfect statement I will quote this
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to JawsomeFTW [2018-03-27 02:32:59 +0000 UTC]
A. HEEEEELLLLL YEEEEAAAAAH
B. AS THE WRITER, YES, I CAN CONFIRM THAT X'D
C. YES
π: 0 β©: 1
JawsomeFTW In reply to Quilaviper [2018-03-28 01:24:10 +0000 UTC]
A. HELL FUCKIN YEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS!
B. I MEAN WHY WOULD A GOD BE INTERESTED IN SOMETHING LIKE LOVE
WHY LOVE WHEN YOU CAN MESS WITH PEOPLE ON A GLOBAL SCALE
BWAM SUDDENLY ITS THE APOCALYPSE NOW OFFER ME SACRAFICES
C. I'm suddenly curious as to what other marvels Savanna has said
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to JawsomeFTW [2018-04-01 17:21:46 +0000 UTC]
B. HAHAHAHA, YES EXACTLY XD
C. OH THERE ARE MANY THINGS, BUT MY MIND'S DRAWING A BLANK UNFORTUNATELY
π: 0 β©: 1
JawsomeFTW In reply to Quilaviper [2018-04-02 20:41:10 +0000 UTC]
B. ONLY THING IS IF HE'S A GOD HOW COME HE CANT JUST STOP THE SHADOW CONFLICT HIMSELF??? ONE OF THE BIGGEST FLAWS OF MOST PMD STORIES WHERE ARCEUS IS GOD (Every fan story with Arceus in it, essentially)
C. We need a wall of quotes by Savanna
Just
We need it
D. WE HAVE OFFICIALLY OFFED A.
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to JawsomeFTW [2018-06-18 08:45:09 +0000 UTC]
B. I DO HAVE AN EXPLANATION FOR THAT LATER, BUT IT'S KIND OF WEAK, IDK
C. HELL YES
D. OH SHIT, POOR A
π: 0 β©: 1
JawsomeFTW In reply to Quilaviper [2018-06-19 21:50:06 +0000 UTC]
B. AT THIS POINT I SHOULD JUST ACCEPT PMD STORIES WILL HAVE THE ARCEUS PLOTHOLE GOING IN
C. Really she could probably start a business of T-Shirts with her quotes on it. I'd buy it.
D. WE NEED TO BRING BACK A
A. HELL FUCKING
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
E. WAIT FUCK NOW ITS ALL OUT OF ORDER
F. STANDS FOR FUCK
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to JawsomeFTW [2018-12-10 05:51:48 +0000 UTC]
B. YUUUP
C. Same honestly???
D. nahhh a is overrated
A. WELP NEVERMIND THEN
E. LOOK WHAT YOU DID
F.UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
π: 0 β©: 1
TheKillerShaymim [2017-01-22 14:36:51 +0000 UTC]
Okay, one, LOVE the way you draw Arceus here. And two, I love how you make him act like how being asexual isn't really that big of a deal which I can totally relate to being asexual who doesn't really care that I am asexual.
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to TheKillerShaymim [2017-01-22 20:05:44 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!!! QwQ
And yeah, he doesn't think it's anything worth dedicating a week to, lol
π: 0 β©: 1
demodoqqo [2016-11-03 05:17:16 +0000 UTC]
... Is it bad I get the part before Arceus says "Isn't that a contradictory statement"...
π: 0 β©: 2
ArceusAdmirer In reply to demodoqqo [2017-02-04 21:48:32 +0000 UTC]
Why would this be bad? It's a opinion.Β A agreeable one at that.
π: 0 β©: 0
Quilaviper In reply to demodoqqo [2016-11-03 15:10:27 +0000 UTC]
... I'm gonna say no? XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Phys09 [2016-10-28 19:24:31 +0000 UTC]
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS FINALLY I FOUND MAH ASEXUAL BOIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSs!!!1111
weren't you bi at one point?
Edit: that desc tho, "UNFUCKABLES"
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to Phys09 [2016-10-29 05:08:35 +0000 UTC]
AYYYYYYYYYYY
I have never been bi, no. XD
DARN TOOTIN'
π: 0 β©: 1
Phys09 In reply to Quilaviper [2016-10-29 05:13:06 +0000 UTC]
I thought I was alone in the world...
but not anymore :3
I can now die a happy man
π: 0 β©: 0
Ch1lly1 [2016-10-26 04:12:09 +0000 UTC]
Asexuality, that's when you prefer neither gender right?
π: 0 β©: 2
Quilaviper In reply to Ch1lly1 [2016-10-26 05:27:27 +0000 UTC]
Yep! Basically it means you have no appeal for sex. XD
π: 0 β©: 3
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-02 16:17:10 +0000 UTC]
... Why is "not feeling any sexual desires"Β a sexuality then? Isn't that just a preference? Not a gender?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkSu8Xβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to ArceusAdmirer [2017-02-02 19:28:27 +0000 UTC]
I see what you mean. "Asexual" is kind of like a lack of sexuality, but I guess they just needed a name for it, so here we are. XD And gender has nothing to do with this, so I don't see why you brought that up, lol
π: 0 β©: 1
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-04 21:52:08 +0000 UTC]
... Alright, fine.
"And gender has nothing to do with this, so I don't see why you brought that up, lol"
Quoted from this comment chain:
"Asexuality, that's when you prefer neither gender right?"
"Yep! Basically it means you have no appeal for sex. XD"
I then responded with the "gender" part. You yourself brought gender into the equation by confirming Ch1lly1's guess.
Also, since you seem to know "unownace", I thought you should know that they're insulting me in a neighboring comment chain after being proven wrong by me.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-04 22:13:22 +0000 UTC]
Okay, cool. You can quote things. And this means... what?
I didn't "misunderstand". You implied as such with your "Yep!". My argument definitely exists.
Sorry, not insults. He's being rather rude though.
You are right. I am barging into other people's conversations. My apologies. I was never trying to be rude in the slightest with anything of my arguments though.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-10 04:25:47 +0000 UTC]
Am I correct in assuming you're angry at me?
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to ArceusAdmirer [2017-02-17 00:46:41 +0000 UTC]
Oh no no no, I just hadn't had the time for deviantArt lately. XD Explained in my latest journal, lol.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-17 00:57:35 +0000 UTC]
Ah, alright.
Sorry. I most likely missed it because you aren't on my watch list.
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to ArceusAdmirer [2017-02-17 01:09:39 +0000 UTC]
That's okay! I was just wanting to let you know that I wasn't mad at you or anything. c:
π: 0 β©: 0
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-08 03:30:13 +0000 UTC]
Alright, fine.
So, Ace got rather upset and blocked me after being rude multiple times. After making a bunch of assumptions about my intentions. They never admitted they were wrong either.
I can even show you the notes if you want to.
Can you tell your friend that capitalizing certain words changes the implied tone of voice within sentences?
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to ArceusAdmirer [2017-02-17 00:47:28 +0000 UTC]
I'm pretty sure he knows that and that's why he does it, lol. But all in all, I prefer to stay out of other people's arguments, so no thank you. XD
π: 0 β©: 1
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-17 00:55:11 +0000 UTC]
That's fine. But I'd prefer if you simply delivered a message. You aren't getting involved with any arguments.
... So, your friend was basically a... "asshole"... to me and you don't have anything to really say on the subject?
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to ArceusAdmirer [2017-02-17 01:00:50 +0000 UTC]
Fair.
I can't control what other people do or say, mate. I've asked people not to fight in my comment sections before, but that doesn't stop people from doing it. :/ You and him have free will, and should both know that you're gonna run into people you disagree with on the Internet.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
ArceusAdmirer In reply to Quilaviper [2017-02-19 23:09:34 +0000 UTC]
That's completely true and you're absolutely right. But they were rather... impolite with me. I've tried to remain calm and polite with them and yet...
π: 0 β©: 0
demodoqqo In reply to Quilaviper [2016-10-26 19:46:35 +0000 UTC]
So basically, you have no desire to ever get married/have a boyfriend (or girlfriend XD)
π: 0 β©: 2
Quilaviper In reply to demodoqqo [2016-10-26 19:50:35 +0000 UTC]
Unless you're asexual AND aromantic, which I am. XD
π: 0 β©: 2
Unownace In reply to Quilaviper [2016-10-27 01:40:11 +0000 UTC]
I'm still not entirely sure, but I'm probably pan-romantic. XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Quilaviper In reply to Unownace [2016-10-27 05:51:59 +0000 UTC]
I thought you thought love was an absurd idea though? XD
π: 0 β©: 2
Unownace In reply to Quilaviper [2016-10-27 15:37:57 +0000 UTC]
I kind of do, at least in the sense other humans seem to treat it. However, certain platonic forms of love I can understand completely; love for a family member, love for a friend, love for a pet, even love for a favourite toy. The reason I have trouble understanding other people's concept of it is that there's often so many complicated rules and details to what makes it work and what doesn't that it just gets confusing to me. But when "love" is described as nothing more than an unconditional caring for someone other than oneself, then it's VERY easy for me to understand, as it comes to me very easily. X3
π: 0 β©: 1
demodoqqo In reply to Quilaviper [2016-10-26 20:53:34 +0000 UTC]
Ehhhhhh I guess I'm somewhere in between lol
π: 0 β©: 1
Unownace In reply to demodoqqo [2016-10-27 01:39:02 +0000 UTC]
YOU'RE TWELVE! YOU SHOULDN'T EVEN KNOW YOUR ORIENTATION YET! XD
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>