HOME | DD

OsmynOree — Quiet

Published: 2009-03-11 13:40:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 2245; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 359
Redirect to original
Description model:kiki

criticism and comments encouraged

this was for her ANTM shots she's trying out to be on the show so she asked if i could take some pics for her i hope she gets on
Related content
Comments: 28

smeajul [2009-03-12 02:09:05 +0000 UTC]

i really like this ozzy beautiful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to smeajul [2009-03-12 02:39:47 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much julie im trying to please me "fans" like always

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smeajul In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-12 05:30:16 +0000 UTC]

lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to smeajul [2009-03-12 10:55:17 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

clockworksharks [2009-03-11 19:27:33 +0000 UTC]

I enjoy this photo, great composition. She has a beautiful face, best of luck to her for getting on the show!! You should take some close up shots of her for her portfolio, I think they look for things like that !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to clockworksharks [2009-03-11 19:38:11 +0000 UTC]

well we did do some close up headshots and i have them but i haven't gotten to editing any of them yet, i thought i would post these first but ill tell her that you wish her luck and i hope that she makes it as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

clockworksharks In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-11 19:40:43 +0000 UTC]

Awesome Can't wait to see the headshots

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to clockworksharks [2009-03-11 19:44:09 +0000 UTC]

they aren't that great but i like them, i just wanted to tell you so you wouldn't get your hopes up for something amazing haha

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Argolith [2009-03-11 17:20:40 +0000 UTC]

Pose and composition are really good, but a little more brightness and saturation wouldn't hurt.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to Argolith [2009-03-11 19:36:13 +0000 UTC]

thank you and i wrote about the saturation in the comment but yeah im trying to figure out how to fix it without losing quality

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Argolith In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-12 16:33:24 +0000 UTC]

You said in the deviation description that you converted the picture from a RAW file. I don't see how that could be a problem, since the RAW format has a higher bit depth (usually 12 per channel) than JPG. If anything, RAW gives you more options when it comes to colors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to Argolith [2009-03-13 01:26:08 +0000 UTC]

well i converted in to jpeg through ummm photoshop and in order to save it as a jpeg i had to change the bit channel to 8 bits instead of 16 and im thinking thats what caused it to desaturate when i posted it on DA or DA couldnt recognize the embedded profile but i really dont know how to get the colors to stay the way i edited them in RAW, any suggestions?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Argolith In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-13 15:55:07 +0000 UTC]

If you embedded a color profile, I don't see why the colors should change... Is it possible that you had a "simulate printer colors" option or something similar enabled while editing?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to Argolith [2009-03-13 21:10:47 +0000 UTC]

well like i said before the color profile thats in photoshop might not get recognized by DA and so they will just discard it and all of the colors i saw when editing will be gone ya know but i know i didnt have simulate printer colors on while i was editing, maybe i should check the color space when i edit next time ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Argolith In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-14 15:43:37 +0000 UTC]

But why should dA not recognize the color profile? Other people use embedded profiles too. Of course you could try using the sRGB color space to be on the safe side. But with an embedded profile this shouldn't really matter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to Argolith [2009-03-15 15:14:58 +0000 UTC]

idk its weird ill figure it wout eventually i guess

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Artillarie [2009-03-11 17:10:01 +0000 UTC]

YAY COLOR!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to Artillarie [2009-03-11 19:32:33 +0000 UTC]

haha yay!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

indi-is-conan [2009-03-11 16:46:49 +0000 UTC]

p.s. I like the color version better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to indi-is-conan [2009-03-11 19:32:26 +0000 UTC]

haha yeah its a little desaturated though i need to figure out how to fix it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

indi-is-conan In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-11 19:54:37 +0000 UTC]

what are you using to convert from RAW?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to indi-is-conan [2009-03-11 20:48:12 +0000 UTC]

im using photoshop to change the channel from 16 bit to 8 bit in order to save them as jpegs so i can post them but idk what else i can do in order to retain the color i got in photoshop ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

indi-is-conan In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-11 21:44:23 +0000 UTC]

yeah changing the color space can be a problem, when I use lightroom to look at my RAW files and do the Export there to PS, I will select 8bit color then I don't have to do any conversion in PS. you could try adding a lil saturation somewhere in your process?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to indi-is-conan [2009-03-12 01:07:43 +0000 UTC]

hmmm well i can try doing that tomorrow maybe that will work, but will that enable me to still keep my colors like the vibrance that i get when i edit them in raw??? just wandering if anything ill listen to you and add saturation after i convert it to 8 bit ya know but thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

indi-is-conan In reply to OsmynOree [2009-03-12 03:40:04 +0000 UTC]

There is a difference in the color palette so no guarantees, but it might do the conversion a little nicer

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to indi-is-conan [2009-03-12 03:45:39 +0000 UTC]

alright thanx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

indi-is-conan [2009-03-11 16:45:52 +0000 UTC]

very nice composition, angle and location, however I think her face has too much shadow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OsmynOree In reply to indi-is-conan [2009-03-11 19:30:06 +0000 UTC]

thanx and i think the shadow on the face is fine BUT her eyes are a little darker

👍: 0 ⏩: 0