Comments: 38
brymj [2016-08-14 17:39:06 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful ship.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
nixops [2015-04-17 17:32:01 +0000 UTC]
Such a beautiful vessel, so very different to the blocks of flats afloat today.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to nixops [2015-04-17 17:59:23 +0000 UTC]
Even the current Cunard MS Queen Victoria and Elizabeth?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
nixops In reply to omega-steam [2015-04-18 07:52:13 +0000 UTC]
Yep, although of the pair the QV looks marginally better than the QE, unfortunately they are all clones of those Vista class, the concept of individuality has gone down the pipes since Carnival started to foist their idea of what a ship should look like onto the cruising public. I am an old school ship buff, I prefer my ships to look like ships and not like flats with pointy ends.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to nixops [2015-04-18 13:03:24 +0000 UTC]
Agreed to be quite honest, looking at the flat side of a Carnival Hull (and believe me, I've been on the Carnival Inspiration for a cruise) makes me imagine how a ship as flat as an iron would float. At least the RMS QM2 looks better, right?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
BadgerN00b [2012-10-22 18:59:11 +0000 UTC]
I'd love to go see her one day...
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
btomimatsu [2012-10-08 06:07:37 +0000 UTC]
Very beautiful indeed and the target of a plethora of angry history buffs.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to btomimatsu [2012-10-08 13:16:18 +0000 UTC]
Who rage against the fact it's not the Titanic, yet it did portray the Titanic in one film
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
btomimatsu In reply to omega-steam [2012-10-08 14:55:31 +0000 UTC]
No not that. It's more or less the 40 plus years bad decisions and neglect the ship got from its lease operators and the city of long beach.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to btomimatsu [2012-10-08 15:13:34 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I see. I wish I could see her run again, too bad her boilers were lost
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to btomimatsu [2012-10-09 03:31:30 +0000 UTC]
Oh blast and damned, Cunard could have used her like Union pacific uses 844 and 3895
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
btomimatsu In reply to omega-steam [2012-10-09 03:34:03 +0000 UTC]
Well, its sort of complicated. As part of the sales agreement with the City of Long Beach, the Queen Mary had to be made unseaworthy, thus the controversial 5+ year conversion in the late 60's and early 70's.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
plappyxsam [2012-10-02 00:30:47 +0000 UTC]
Last true masterpiece of White Star Line
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to plappyxsam [2012-10-02 01:01:16 +0000 UTC]
I would correct you, but Cunard did own White Star at the time. However, Queen Mary was built exclusively for the Cunard Line, while the RMS Olympic was the only White Star ship left after the merger
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
omega-steam In reply to Eddie-Sand [2013-04-22 23:32:25 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Eddie, I learned not to listen to myself while intoxicated after this. It did clear up some misconceptions I had about Cunard and White Star's merger, if it did exist.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Eddie-Sand In reply to omega-steam [2013-04-22 23:37:40 +0000 UTC]
" I learned not to listen to myself while intoxicated after this."
wut?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to Eddie-Sand [2013-04-22 23:47:38 +0000 UTC]
I sometimes get naturally "baked" and begin babbling incoherant thoughts at random, I have no idea why
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Eddie-Sand In reply to omega-steam [2013-04-23 00:08:46 +0000 UTC]
O.o you might want to get that checked out.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to Eddie-Sand [2013-04-23 00:25:10 +0000 UTC]
And get ritalin'd? No thank you.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
omega-steam In reply to plappyxsam [2012-10-02 01:56:21 +0000 UTC]
Not all classic Ocean Liners look like titanic
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
plappyxsam In reply to omega-steam [2012-10-03 02:28:56 +0000 UTC]
I know, but the Birtannic and Olympia were the twin sisters of the titanic
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
engineer825 [2012-08-26 15:37:05 +0000 UTC]
She certainly looks lovely.......needs a touch up on paint though.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Random-Prospector [2012-08-05 02:40:51 +0000 UTC]
You mean to be on this ship in its heyday, in first class.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to Random-Prospector [2012-08-05 02:41:28 +0000 UTC]
Right in the bridge or down in the piston and turbine room!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
omega-steam In reply to Random-Prospector [2012-08-05 03:43:04 +0000 UTC]
Seeing those massive A-frame reciprocating engines pump up and down, powering the turbines that spin huge axles connected to the massive brass quad-propellers... technology porn right there
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Soundwave3591 [2012-08-04 22:02:23 +0000 UTC]
COMMENT
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Evel6 [2012-08-04 19:40:55 +0000 UTC]
Excelent picture. Congrats
๐: 0 โฉ: 0