Comments: 75
OEVRLORD In reply to ??? [2023-01-07 18:21:45 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Elouq [2016-08-15 18:40:13 +0000 UTC]
sexy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LotG [2012-07-14 02:32:13 +0000 UTC]
Wow, very nice, all on one layer too? Envious!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Raven913 [2011-09-10 20:06:35 +0000 UTC]
Wow, all on one layer? That is amazing. I particularly like the detail on the helmet and the sword.
Her, ah, chest might be a bit too big though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thevampiredio [2011-07-26 04:36:48 +0000 UTC]
dem skin tight latex
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Agrifex [2011-07-24 22:38:20 +0000 UTC]
Then I'm dead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
plasmapivot [2011-07-24 00:02:41 +0000 UTC]
You never fail to amaze me. :0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar [2011-07-22 20:48:12 +0000 UTC]
It's pretty, but EGAD, the boobs! Eldar do not possess enough body fat for bustiness of that proportion. And they're too in-your-face. No! Stay away! You can poke someone's eyes out with those things and I don't mean the blades!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-23 01:09:27 +0000 UTC]
Ha, maybe it's just the way the armour is moulded. I dunno.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-23 09:25:43 +0000 UTC]
Damn you, /tg/, for infecting me with the notion of practical armour!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-23 10:27:11 +0000 UTC]
Shouldn't /tg/ have destroyed that notion?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-23 11:17:51 +0000 UTC]
With all threads against boobplate? Not a chance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-23 13:25:45 +0000 UTC]
I don't know that I have encountered those.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-23 13:30:32 +0000 UTC]
Almost any realistic armour thread has got elements of that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-23 22:45:14 +0000 UTC]
Uh, never really saw those either. There were a few armour threads when I was a /k/ommando, but that was more about weapon/armour pron than anything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-23 22:50:20 +0000 UTC]
You're lying. Only things that /k/ommandos talk about are guns and general intolerance for anything.
And I still don't get how you managed to miss all the medieval weaponry, realistic armour and EAST SUCKS, WEST RULES threads. I refuse to acknowledge the possibility.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-23 22:53:14 +0000 UTC]
No no, there were certainly some armour threads.
Nope, I definitely missed those. I would'a heartily liked such conversations if I had stumbled upon them, so I must not have seen any before.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-23 23:09:02 +0000 UTC]
Riiight...And I'm a /d/eviant.
Well, at times, they devolve into POLEARMS BEAT EVERYTHING and dickguard (I'm not joking, some plate armours had specific parts to protect your raging hard-on while you're slaughtering in the field - you could hang battle trophies on those things), but they're mostly enjoyable and a great source of pictures with seriously pimped-out armour (I'm just waiting that some historian discovers scriptures detailing medieval versions of Xzibit and Pimp My Ride).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-24 00:35:40 +0000 UTC]
Ha, you might be!
Ah yes, I have seen those fabled codpieces before. I do enjoy plentiful pictures of weapons and armour, hence my presence on /k/ before I found /tg/.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-24 08:25:45 +0000 UTC]
Don't make me bury you with oldschool hip-hop.
I imagine you have a lot of gun folders.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-25 02:53:11 +0000 UTC]
Aah! Old-School Hip-Hop, my one trve foe.
No, I have none. I occasionally set images of guns as my desktop background, however.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-25 07:32:27 +0000 UTC]
When you mention trve, did you know that website Trve vs. Emo classifies deviantART as 99% emo? It is disturbingly accurate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-25 23:18:56 +0000 UTC]
I did not know that, but I too am disturbed by a great deal of content on deviant art. I considered a greater portion of the community to be weeaboo, actually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-25 23:31:53 +0000 UTC]
Weaboo, emo, what's the difference? Anime characters either fight or they cry from what I gathered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-26 23:43:45 +0000 UTC]
Yes, and they speak to themselves frequently about 'enemy power levels,' or whatever else enters their animated little brain. Plus they grunt/gasp all the time. I never understood that. Like, and enemy character does something unexpected, and suddenly 'UGH!'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-27 08:24:18 +0000 UTC]
[link]
Truly, the superior animation and storytelling of glorious Nippon.
If you haven't noticed, that was sarcasm, just in case.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-27 10:23:40 +0000 UTC]
Yes, exactly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-27 10:52:27 +0000 UTC]
Have you noticed that nothing coming from Japan has internal consistency? No games, no cartoons, no nothing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-27 12:54:39 +0000 UTC]
Well it's all pretty stupid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-27 13:30:27 +0000 UTC]
Yes. It is. Newest Dungeon Siege is just stupid anime game now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-27 22:52:12 +0000 UTC]
What is that, Dungeon Siege III? That's an anime game now?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-27 23:00:05 +0000 UTC]
Here.
[link]
Be the judge of that. Before, it was made by Gas Powered Games. Now, it is made by Square Enix.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to Skrakar [2011-07-27 23:03:36 +0000 UTC]
Square?! Erk!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skrakar In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-27 23:16:55 +0000 UTC]
Indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GoldenArbiter [2011-07-22 20:45:12 +0000 UTC]
Really good work though. (also, sorry about double commenting... again...)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoldenArbiter [2011-07-22 20:44:39 +0000 UTC]
Slaaneshy eldar... I hate Slaaneshy eldar...
I also hate Slaanesh...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to GoldenArbiter [2011-07-23 01:08:11 +0000 UTC]
Slaanesh is the god of trannies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoldenArbiter In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-25 18:33:04 +0000 UTC]
people from Quebec. only the separatists from Quebec though. the call themselves Quebecois.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OEVRLORD In reply to GoldenArbiter [2011-07-25 23:21:04 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I see. Like here, some people call themselves 'Taswegians,' but that's dumb as hell, in my opinion. This isn't 'Tasway.' On the other hand, I am from the glorious North, so it's all a little foreign.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoldenArbiter In reply to OEVRLORD [2011-07-25 23:45:38 +0000 UTC]
All in all there just another inside joke that belongs to the entire country.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>