Comments: 27
AndyofIndiana [2015-01-29 13:25:09 +0000 UTC]
I believe that is a Lamia
š: 0 ā©: 1
oddsocket In reply to AndyofIndiana [2015-01-29 16:49:26 +0000 UTC]
A lot of people use 'naga' and 'lamia' interchangably, but naga is the more common term for a snake-person and it's the term I prefer to use.
(If we're going to get technical about it, neither would be a suitable term because she's not a deity nor is she the correct ethnicity to be an actual naga, and Lamia was originally a specific individual in Greek mythology rather than a species.)
There is no correct term for a snake-girl (apart from perhaps snake-girl). Basically, people can pick the ones they like. I like 'naga'.
š: 0 ā©: 1
Vena22 In reply to oddsocket [2016-11-09 09:44:38 +0000 UTC]
no no lamia has only a snake tail a naga is more like eyes snake tongue and sclaes on the upperbody thats a lot of difrence between naga and lamia
š: 0 ā©: 1
oddsocket In reply to Vena22 [2016-11-09 10:49:40 +0000 UTC]
The comment you're replying to is over a year old, haha.
But yeah. That's not necessarily what defines the differences? In popular culture the interpretations of naga and lamia have become practically identical - with 'lamia' ranging anywhere from fully humanoid demons to snake-people, and with 'naga' being anywhere from snake-from-the-waist-down (mermaid style) or more like a fully anthropomorphic snake. If it's a snake person, someone might end up calling it one of the two?
But in actual mythology they're definitely very different. Lamia was a Greek mythologyical figure: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamia and the Naga is a snake deity: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C4%81gā¦
So basically almost everyone's fantasy naga/lamia are wrong in the first place, but 'naga' is definitely closer to the original meaning if you're going to talk people with snake tails.
š: 0 ā©: 0
tazius [2014-06-26 17:04:57 +0000 UTC]
This is one of my favourite things you've done.
š: 0 ā©: 0
joshpoint0 [2014-06-22 14:23:53 +0000 UTC]
Where's her snake half's underbelly?
š: 0 ā©: 1
oddsocket In reply to joshpoint0 [2014-06-22 16:07:03 +0000 UTC]
Haha, consider it a little artistic license. I know on a realistic level she ought to have one but I was sort of rushing this out for a overly nearby deadline and skimped out on a few things I would have otherwise drawn. :L
š: 0 ā©: 1
oddsocket In reply to joshpoint0 [2014-06-22 17:04:56 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. Not that there's really any requirement to draw an underbelly on a naga that's identical to a real snake's, anyway. I mean, if one was to be 'realistic' about it they'd probably only have belly on the end half of their tail. Seeing as the upper half spends most of its time off of the ground (at least in the way people typically depict nagas) and all it'd render having belly scales on the upper half pretty redundant.
š: 0 ā©: 1
joshpoint0 In reply to oddsocket [2014-06-22 17:46:26 +0000 UTC]
True but then again a cobra can kinda stand up
š: 0 ā©: 1
oddsocket In reply to joshpoint0 [2014-06-22 17:54:13 +0000 UTC]
Yes, but that's not how they typically move themselves along. They don't just crawl along on their butt ends with their heads in the air.Ā
š: 0 ā©: 1
CKentavr [2014-06-22 09:36:23 +0000 UTC]
Pretty.
š: 0 ā©: 1
oddsocket In reply to CKentavr [2014-06-22 16:07:11 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much!
š: 0 ā©: 0
Hellzweire [2014-06-21 06:18:25 +0000 UTC]
Man, it's nice to see a female naga without giant balloon breasts and vaginal scales that make no sense.
She's really pretty and I'm not too sure what actually makes me like her. You know? Since I don't often find a female naga design I like.
š: 0 ā©: 3
joshpoint0 In reply to Hellzweire [2014-06-22 14:24:57 +0000 UTC]
You don't mean an underbelly by vaginal scales do you?
š: 0 ā©: 1
Hellzweire In reply to joshpoint0 [2014-06-22 14:57:20 +0000 UTC]
No, I don't. Not at all.
š: 0 ā©: 1
Hellzweire In reply to EVAUnit4A [2014-06-22 05:06:14 +0000 UTC]
Aren't you the guy that only commented on a drawing I did of naga because I drew him with external human genitalia?
š: 0 ā©: 1
Hunter2045 [2014-06-21 05:57:41 +0000 UTC]
Nice work.
š: 0 ā©: 1
deaththekidfan229 [2014-06-20 20:10:34 +0000 UTC]
dis.is.AWESOME. you did so good Guv!
š: 0 ā©: 1
oddsocket In reply to deaththekidfan229 [2014-06-20 20:15:31 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much, I'm glad you like it! c:
š: 0 ā©: 1
deaththekidfan229 In reply to oddsocket [2014-06-20 20:23:33 +0000 UTC]
i wuv snake's so dis is even more cool and welcome O3O and 3 hour's and more on one thing....wow did you get sleep? xd
š: 0 ā©: 0