HOME | DD

Null-Cipher β€” Deconstructive Decomposer

Published: 2006-10-24 22:02:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 2638; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 564
Redirect to original
Description This is a conceptual peice I've been working on for the last month....the mushroom ate three books and new writing was produced. I'm not going to get to far into it right now becuase I would rather get interpretive feedback..that is if you have the time
Here is the text the mushroom is composed off PLEASE READ!

The stalk is made up of quotes from the three books:
Postmodern thought is no longer binary thought. What we must learn, then, is how to conceive difference without opposition.
Everything that is thought and expressed in words is one-sided, only half the truth; it lacks totality, completeness, unity.
This conflict cannot be solved by an either-or but only by a kind of two-way thinking: doing one thing while not losing sight of the other.

The postmodernist work attempts to upset the reassuring stability of the mastering position.
For the more a theory lays claim to universal validity, the less capable it is of doing justice to the individual facts.

Without consciousness there would, practically speaking, be no world, for the world exists as such only in so far as it is consciously reflected.
To claim this is also to claim that the world exists only in and through a subject who believes that he is producing the world.
And all the voices, all the goals, all the yearnings, all the sorrows, all the pleasures, all the good and evil, all of them together was the world.

The natural state of the psyche consists in a certain jostling together of its components and in the contradictoriness of their behavior.
Multiple meanings engendered by a single sign; rather, two clearly defined but mutually incompatible readings are engaged in blind confrontation in such a way that it is impossible to choose.
When he did not bind his soul to any one particular voice but heard them all, the whole, the unity; then the great song of a thousand voices consisted of one word: OMβ€”perfection.

It is the medium from which the religious experience seems to flow.
Every sign, can be cited, in doing so it can break with every given context, engendering an infinity of new contexts.
And yet it was always there; it was always the same and yet every moment it was new.

Our psyche, remains an insoluble puzzle and incomprehensible wonder.
Signifieds and signifiers are continually breaking apart and reattaching in new combinations.
Nothing is mine, I know nothing, I possess nothing, I have learned nothing. How strange it is.

He had died and a new Siddhartha had awakened from his sleep.
The era of hyperreality now begins.
Do you understand what you are reading?


The cap is made up of individual words from the books:
Regrouping the words of books changes the meaning of all the words, thus revealing the entwined significance of the text produced.
What-one-means exists only within the context of the other words and is dependant on the brain of the receiver.
What I say belongs to other individuals in a thousand ways.

I hope you, in observing my patterns of ideas, find your own meaning.
What happens is that the mind will join together many elements that are meaningful in content, composing a collage of individual experience.
Perhaps we always do this.

When you express thoughts or opinions you must not constrain them.
Allow other people to transform what you say and find in their individual investigations new meaning.
Only then, by being open to difference, can we find peace.

Embrace the changeability of words and seek self-knowledge in anything expressed by others.
Do not force any standpoint on other people.
People interpret and invent but nothing is absolute.

In this way we are like mushrooms breaking down language in order to absorb the nutrients.
We decay and deconstruct to cultivate different perspectives and find new meaning.

This relationship of symbiotic decomposition that takes place between everybody deepens the complexity of every individual experience.

Each mushroom is what it isβ€”its own center.

Thankyou for your mind

Materials: Paper three books
Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse
The Anti-Aesthetic by Hal Foster
The Undiscovered Self by Carl Jung
Related content
Comments: 15

blawte [2007-08-28 03:19:32 +0000 UTC]

Wow, this really makes me want to take something of this nature on, it's amazing, the detail, and yet you throw in philosophy and fact into the groove. I like it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Asitis [2007-05-23 10:45:54 +0000 UTC]

Tis the main mushroom season in Australia agian, so I thought I'd re-visit your work. Must say second time round is great, very subtle with such beauty. I have been blessed with a great fungi season too.


P.S. what has become of this piece?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

neipas13 [2006-12-15 16:30:35 +0000 UTC]

The sentiments of TSHansen above speak clearly and are shared by myself. Great work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TSHansen [2006-10-28 08:21:34 +0000 UTC]

absolutely a brillant concept of neural linguistic fusions made manifest. Charming to say the least

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wavefreak [2006-10-25 13:56:27 +0000 UTC]

Alot of words.

I had an interesting conversation with my 11 year old son about humans and war. I asked why are there wars. Of course he had no good answer, and I pointed out to him that there IS no good answer. My reasoning is that if there really was a good answer to that question then wars would cease to exist because we could address the root cause. This, similar to thousands of years worth of other philisophical concepts, is the failing of post-modernism. It doesn't really get to the heart of what troubles humanity. It only cloaks it in a different linguistic framework.

But your shroom is cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Null-Cipher In reply to wavefreak [2006-10-25 16:07:17 +0000 UTC]

I do agree post-modernism is not the answer, it touches on it I think by giving the veiwer/reader more authority, but it stops short and in a way negates itself. Post-ism would be more appropriate...that is to stop relying on isms so much and speak more as individuals. I think isms have a lot to do with war, well that and greed.
I tried to make the cap of this mushroom a message of finding individual meaning. It is a lot of words but we use words a lot....they are everywhere...we should be aware of language as subject and not just medium.
Why do we search for an answer? Or better yet what even is the question? Nothing is absolute but us humans just don't seem to be able to stop thinking...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

wavefreak In reply to Null-Cipher [2006-10-25 17:48:56 +0000 UTC]

To say nothing is absolute is incorrect. It is closer to the truth to say human language and thought cannot adequately conceive of and define absolutes. This does not negate their existance.

You must also realize that, even if we we have different points of view, your mushroom has succeeded in that it causes the viewer (in this case me) to think. That makes it a good work. I think it makes it especially good because it causes contemplation without being offensive. The piece "Piss Christ" [link] provokes dialog, but by being blatently offensive to a large segment of the population. I much prefer the tact you chose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Asitis In reply to wavefreak [2006-10-25 23:27:44 +0000 UTC]

Like the mushroom, I have digested what you have both said, and in my little nutrient gathering world the message I have 'absorbed' is the same truth. Subjectively, there ARE absolutes limited by our ever expanding insight (consciousness), and these absolutes are negated by the insight they bring. We have to stop trying to find the end of the universe, because for there to be one there has to be a beginning. The only structure in chaos is our limited perception (glass ceiling if you will).

Maybe

By the way this is an excellent piece and well worth scarifying those dust gathering pages.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Asitis In reply to Asitis [2006-11-07 22:20:33 +0000 UTC]

cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Null-Cipher In reply to Asitis [2006-11-06 04:08:44 +0000 UTC]

I don't know about absolutes I think we somehow got on a tangent there...I'm working on another peice that has more to do with that I think.
Happy you got somthing out it and yeah blah blah blah.....philosophy gets to be that way too much I think...thats why making art for me{even theory/word peices} is refreshing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JustinChristenbery In reply to Null-Cipher [2006-10-25 17:24:20 +0000 UTC]

....and so we make art We leave it all behind and go out to the tip of the limb of reason, and leap off...into the mystical, mysterious unknown....

...like your piece says, a new way of thinking is prescribed, one where we can focus our minds specifically on, say....these words you're reading right now, and at the very same instant we can, peripherally, be aware of a vast and interconnected reality that gave rise and context to this and everything else....by paying attention to both the cornucopia of phenomena and the "Om" we can enter deeper and more fulfilling relationships with each.

I'm with you on the inadequacy of post-modernism. Deconstruction can certainly help in the understanding of reality.....but the real fun starts when we start building. When we create, in an instant or throughout a life-time, we open-peripherally- to a larger Reality than what we can be aware of with a focused awareness.

I just watched a video on Google about Intelligent Design...
[link]
it really does seem to be the only "logical" theory. The possibilities are endless, especially when thoughts like these...and the ones your sculpture presents...are placed on the table. Everything has not been done, we've only just begun, and this is a great place to start doing the things that need to be done.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Null-Cipher In reply to JustinChristenbery [2006-11-06 04:23:29 +0000 UTC]

I personally don't see the opposition between evolution and intelligent design...at least within me they fit together pretty welll...evolution of intelligence and intelligent evolution is where it is at...the only problem with intelligent design is its too strong association with Christianity...just like the word "feminism" I wouldn't identify with it becuase of the numerous and strong other associations it brings up. That is why it is important to find new ways of saying these things I think.
DNA is intelligence
I like what you are saying about scope and focus it is a lot to think about...we are very much thinking multi-scopic at all times I think.
I'm glad you had a good time with this one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chelovek [2006-10-25 02:53:27 +0000 UTC]

Dude, thats an amazing concept... im impressed...


After growing mushrooms my self, i understand their beauty.


Not to mention the magic ones.... they got their own story to tell..



Very cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AdamDPalmer [2006-10-24 23:28:39 +0000 UTC]

this piece gives me the impression that you like mushrooms.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Silent-Pea [2006-10-24 22:13:06 +0000 UTC]

thats alot of paper...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0