Comments: 58
tarbano In reply to ??? [2012-03-29 02:50:04 +0000 UTC]
on dromeosaurids and many other theropods groups, I'm all fore a full or fairly full feather covering. Others such as T.rexs, Tarbosaurs; or the Carnosaurs; I still favor the scales with some plumes. Feathers may be great temperature regulators, but on a body THAT big (much larger then say, an ostrich or Moa); I just don't see it happening
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
8bitAviation In reply to Tianithen [2012-09-27 22:39:34 +0000 UTC]
well, a lot of people arguing that feathered dinosaurs look stupid say birds look stupid with feathers. feathered dinosaurs look awesomer than those giant iguanas of the past. or maybe I'm just saying that because I'm a bird lover as well xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crystal-rex In reply to ??? [2012-03-20 13:06:02 +0000 UTC]
XD it's like the great 'what's better' debate where both sides seem to go way too far XDD
I love this picture though, and it illustrates a pretty good argument. Chickens just look SAD without their feathers XD That linked picture was almost disturbing, but heck, it would make a great chicken anatomy study XDD
I remember the days when I thought no dinosaurs had feathers XD back when no one believed they did XD but I was gradually sold on the fossil evidence and now... well, it just seems natural that some had feathers, especially if the evolutionary direction is taken into account. Gotta love me some winged Deinonychus, yep.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
novablue In reply to crystal-rex [2012-03-20 16:31:50 +0000 UTC]
Haha, I know what you mean. I seem to recall that when I saw the first depictions of dinosaurs, I was hesitant, but they've really grown on me and now I can't imagine them without feathers. In general, I feel many dinosaurs are still depicted as "skin over bones", I don't mean that all should be feathered but... I mean, animals have muscles, wrinkles, thick patches of skin and so on, they don't show every bone jutting out usually lol. I never claim that my drawings are "true" or "realistic" - but I do love experimenting with kinda going beyond the evidence and just having fun imagining what type of growths and such could exist on these animals, not just feathers but also all sorts of other features.
It's very interesting to see animals without their usual fur/feathers btw, if horrifying sometimes...! I recently saw this photo [link] and the first thing that struck me was that I never realized bears have such long, pointed ears beneath all that fur...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
crystal-rex In reply to novablue [2012-03-20 17:08:20 +0000 UTC]
You have a really good point there, and now I'm imagining some dinosaurs with all sorts of weird crests and knobs and wrinkles XDD You're right that normal animals are just like that! I guess people just forget to take that into account when all you can see are the bones, huh?
That bear is just awesome XD Man I should look up pictures of bald animals for some anatomy research! They really do have longer ears o.o Thank yooou.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SageKorppi In reply to Kronosaurus82 [2012-10-12 15:47:49 +0000 UTC]
To be fair there is more and more evidence that feathers/feather-like filaments were found in such basal theropod lineages that it was likely they all had feather-like/filamentous structures at one point(not including a secondary loss). I've seen convincing evidence that the feather/filament synapomorphy started in the archosaurian clade and was secondarily lost in crocodilians.
This doesn't mean everyone had contour feathers and the like, but it's becoming clear that feather-like integument was far more common than previously though. Besides, feathers are damn amazing anatomical structures and aren't just for beauty or heat conservation!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev |