Comments: 63
MadManTnT In reply to ??? [2011-01-13 16:43:49 +0000 UTC]
thanks, is not photo(the photo was wery bad) this was the best choise for the best impact, the background was bad, i meen bad bad. and is not a gradient is simply a gassium blur, and the soft glow (no brush was used, or sponge, or dodge, is made by the gassium blure, and depending of your monitor, look's bad or good ). the photo was made whit a 5mp cam, so i wasn't able to go so deep whit the details, if i would lett the photo whit a simply background, it would it been bad...you even want to see it in full screan...you can't get that tipe of dof whit a dslr. The theniques used to edit the photo was Lab work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Curiousphoenix In reply to MadManTnT [2011-01-13 18:08:52 +0000 UTC]
Ok, seeing as it was Gaussian Blur, next time, try not to use too much of it.
When I use Gaussian Blur, I use it faint enough to see what was originally there, but heavy enough to add depth to an image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to Curiousphoenix [2011-01-13 18:18:42 +0000 UTC]
belive me, this was the best optinon. the rule of composing says :if the background takes the eye from the main subject , you have 2 option. 1: delete the background, 2: blure it(even to extrem)...and you don't see to many photos like mine on dev
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Curiousphoenix In reply to MadManTnT [2011-01-13 18:51:40 +0000 UTC]
i would still rather see the actual photograph, rather than a semi-poorly edited version.
but thats just me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to Curiousphoenix [2011-01-13 19:02:49 +0000 UTC]
i don't think that is poorly edited. Simply the photo atract's your eyes, to the main subject, whitout distracting you from the background. you shoul learn more stuff about composition, and photo decizion
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Curiousphoenix In reply to MadManTnT [2011-01-13 19:06:36 +0000 UTC]
i didn't say poorly edited.
i said semi-poorly edited. there is a difference ¬_¬
I'm not a photographer, so no I shouldn't learn ¬_¬
Note to you, you can still attract someone to your main focal eg, the flower, WITHOUT blurring the hell out of the background, because you gave your image an overall bad look.
Next time, blur it slightly, then it'll look like a real photograph.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to Curiousphoenix [2011-01-13 19:10:48 +0000 UTC]
belive me when i say that the background is crapy. you are a digital artist so you should learn, how to compose a images. as bad as you think this photo is, i just sell it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Curiousphoenix In reply to MadManTnT [2011-01-13 19:15:08 +0000 UTC]
I doubt the background was that crappy any ways.
And I do know about composition.
I didn't say it was bad! I said it could be better and semi-poorly done!
You are taking this all the wrong way.
Critique helps you grow!
And I have added hints to help you grow, but no.
You don't wanna listen and you are taking it all the complete wrong way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to Curiousphoenix [2011-01-13 19:21:45 +0000 UTC]
i understand what you are saying to me. look at my other photo...And belive me between noise, crappy stuff in the background and blure, you will chose the blure
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Curiousphoenix In reply to MadManTnT [2011-01-13 19:40:41 +0000 UTC]
the "crappy" background is what makes the photograph.
without it, its just a manipulation. a fake.
but whatever, so much for "Valuing someone's input"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to Curiousphoenix [2011-01-13 19:58:02 +0000 UTC]
the crappy background is what destrois a photo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Curiousphoenix In reply to MadManTnT [2011-01-13 19:59:02 +0000 UTC]
whatever.
I'm seriously not gonna waste my time with this anymore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sed [2013-01-04 14:08:13 +0000 UTC]
Nice color!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chazagirl [2012-10-05 05:17:33 +0000 UTC]
You have been featured in my journal. [link] If you want me to remove your art please just let me know! Otherwise Enjoy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arualcat [2012-05-24 09:50:50 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
er111a [2011-02-27 00:08:23 +0000 UTC]
this reminds me of one of my shots
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MadManTnT In reply to Dieffi [2011-02-19 10:34:56 +0000 UTC]
thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dieffi In reply to MadManTnT [2011-02-19 14:29:14 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MadManTnT In reply to AsseelSweet [2011-02-04 18:48:44 +0000 UTC]
thanks, come and see my other yellow stuff
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ddnlj [2011-01-17 22:14:35 +0000 UTC]
This would make a beautiful print.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to ddnlj [2011-01-17 23:10:46 +0000 UTC]
thanks, please feel free to visit my gallery, and leave your opinion, it's help's me
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
robert-kim-karen [2011-01-14 08:24:13 +0000 UTC]
I like the way you have it framed/composed. Looks good. Background blur looks nice, makes a good contrast. The yellow blur from flower might be overdoing it a little. To get a nice halo looking effect, try the Orton effect. Digitally, make a duplicate layer of your flower cutout, increase the exposure by 1 1/2 or 2 stops, blur marginally and then blend layer using 'multiply'. Gives the same general feel without dominating the composition with the blur.
-
Any way, I do like it as is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
creativemikey [2011-01-14 02:24:01 +0000 UTC]
such elegance and depth to yellow!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to Kelsey-Brown [2011-01-14 00:24:10 +0000 UTC]
hey, thanks feel free to visit my other photos, you will have some surprisez
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kalyuchka [2011-01-13 20:42:39 +0000 UTC]
))))
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to kalyuchka [2011-01-13 20:59:04 +0000 UTC]
ok, thanks, i guess
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadManTnT In reply to kalyuchka [2011-01-14 18:00:31 +0000 UTC]
ok, then for what?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Missgoku [2011-01-13 15:30:46 +0000 UTC]
so warm...soft and lovelyv:3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
seothiann [2011-01-13 15:27:24 +0000 UTC]
You`ll enable critique or i`ll write here ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kwab-Fu [2011-01-13 14:39:14 +0000 UTC]
It give a happy shine, like the sun.
I like the leaves how thet are bright but still have some darker shades.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>