HOME | DD
kevinroberts — CENSORED
Published: 2011-09-18 16:19:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 11513; Favourites: 160; Downloads: 324
Redirect to original
Description
When not helping protesters organize and overthrow repressive dictatorships facebook admin is protecting us here at home by censoring dangerous images like this one.Not only was this image deleted but I had to agree to a statement that I'd no longer upload pornographic images before I could log back on. I'm trying to reform myself.
© Kevin Roberts
Related content
Comments: 32
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Facebook was, is and always shall be a shallow pool of Bourgeois Shangri-La vomit.
This photo, model, pose and location are all cool and tastefully sexy!
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
haha agreed, and thank-you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fb should have removed this, after all it it thought provoking. Can't have people going around thinking.
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
No kidding! Has Facebook really censored this picture? Its "sexual content" is enough explicit for a kind of picture as this -a ballet dancer or gym or swimming picture of a woman-; I don't find nothing "porno" on it. I think it's beautiful and lovely, but no "grotesque" and very artful...
That's the problem when people sell their soul to Facebook...
Well done you talk about that...
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
If it wasn't for those watermarks, this would be a fav.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Thanks Bruno! I've always meant to upload a h-res version of this, sans watermark.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That'd be a great idea.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
LOL this is a dangerous image? Have been contemplating posting some pictures on Facebook... But I think I won't now.
I like your sense of humour though!
And, I also like how you've framed the picture and left it in b/w to accentuate the textures. The swimsuit/leotard is somewhat sheer, which is intriguing, since I'm left wondering how exactly sheer it is. Colour would probably have been pretty distracting
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
OMG! Can I use this as a sample with credit? I have been showcasing art banned by Facebook which include Dali's not-nude portraits and many others like Rembrant and even Picasso (yeah, cubist = porn, apparently).
This one, though, is CRAZY!! I needs to go here: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Absolutely. Yes, the Cubists were all a bunch of pervs, well known fact haha, and subversives as well!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
haha thanks Juan, I can only hope I didn't do any lasting damage to the people that viewed it before it was removed. Ironically, there was a second copy of it in my profile photos that they missed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Censorship is first and foremost... about taking away other people's choices! What bothers me most isn't even the idea that the censor's judgement somehow supersedes everyone else's, but that they've make it to PROTECT them those others. Sheesh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
haha thanks Jan, I appreciate it! Wish I could hit the streets at night and do some nudes in just pointe shoes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it seems not to be a problem.. or?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
haha exactly!!! thank-you
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
I'm as fed up as you when it comes to shit relevant to what you've written about. Kinda refreshing to have read something like that coming from someone else. Anyway, nice photo. Maybe an uncensored version to follow? Haha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks! Yes, empowering stupid people everywhere haha and so sad almost no one has the moral fortitude to stand up to them and say 'Gee, if you're offended maybe you shouldn't be here?'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, as always, it's not their fault. Shame on the source for polluting people's minds.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This...breaks the fb rules???
Some of your other work I can see being nsffb (not safe for facebook), but this should be clearly within their guidelines. Perhaps they only saw the thumbnail and thought, as did I, that you were moving from soft nudes to explicite erotica.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
P.S. I'll upload a hi-res version of this later. My friend Emily, photographed about 15 years ago in my back alley, on film of course.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0