Comments: 16
cullyferg2010 [2018-06-23 04:23:30 +0000 UTC]
Kinda like the Russians designing a cargo plane that could double as a bomber. Still, this does look like an excellent transport. Now if they can build bigger and better engines . . .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-07-19 09:25:54 +0000 UTC]
It's very much a design limited by its engines. I was working on an 'upgrade', but it got shoved to the side.
Maybe at a later date...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to kanyiko [2018-07-20 01:36:49 +0000 UTC]
Maybe slap two more on the wings? They seem big enough to hand them!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-07-22 14:00:10 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm... the fuselage is alright, but the wings and engines most definitely fall short. I'm considering mating the fuselage with a new wing. >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to kanyiko [2018-07-23 03:14:51 +0000 UTC]
I'd keep everything else as is, just add a couple of more engines to it. That's just my take.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-08-08 12:56:34 +0000 UTC]
The outboard wing sections are bolted on, so putting the engines there would add a lot of stress on the connections - perhaps too lot.
No, I'd have to redesign the entire inner wing section, extending it outwards, and slightly reposition the wing at the same time to offset the changed center of balance...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to kanyiko [2018-08-09 03:57:58 +0000 UTC]
Maybe add a tractor/pusher nacelle above the fuselage and centered on the wing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shabazik [2016-10-23 13:22:33 +0000 UTC]
Very nice plane, but there are some parts I don't know what are for? these things hanging under the wing, like a small second wing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to Shabazik [2016-11-01 20:52:58 +0000 UTC]
Ah, they are flaps - devices that provide extra lift during take-off and landing, effectively by enlarging the wing surface. Most flap designs are incorporated inside the wing, however the Tonde uses a different (and for Cyrtavia - an easier to build) design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
benitezdk [2016-09-30 07:00:15 +0000 UTC]
... Could an alternative solution had been folding up outer wings?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kanyiko In reply to benitezdk [2016-10-05 19:14:26 +0000 UTC]
It could, but doing so would make the construction far more complicated, and heavier than a regular wing. The folding mechanism would add quite a bit of weight to the whole, and it would also bring in structural issues which might compromise the design...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kanyiko In reply to DBrentOGara [2016-09-30 10:24:33 +0000 UTC]
Here you are!
From front to back, that is the observer's/bomb aimers compartiment; single fixed forward-firing machine gun; cockpit (full cockpit for pilot, and secondary, rudimentary cockpit for co-pilot/bomb aimer/observer); navigator's/radio operator's compartiment, with extra fold-down seat for an extra crew member; cargo compartiment; toilet; and rear gunner station.
The flap mechanism is actually relatively simple (as Cyrtavia doesn't have the know-how for some more complex technology: it is simply a "screwjack and guiderail" system. This allows for four flap settings: retracted (as shown here); extended (extended back 1 foot, increasing the effective wing surface while not creating any additional drag); 15° down (16 inch extended); and 30° down (20 inch extended).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
burstlion [2016-09-29 23:41:59 +0000 UTC]
Nifty upgrade!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1