HOME | DD

JACAC β€” Lisbon118

#graffiti #man #photography #street
Published: 2016-03-07 15:34:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 725; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description h e y . m a n . s m i l e ...

k i n d l y . f e a t u r e d . b y :

StrEeT phOtoGraPhY #III.II









I See You by zhenyab
Urban olympics by veftenie
Music, Sweet Music by patrick-brian
Lisbon118 by JACAC
Rooms for Rent by Jack-Nobre
reflection by slownumbers
This

is...


STREET


PHOTOGRAPHY


Β© COPYRIGHT JosΓ© Calheiros
All rights reserved. All works i show on DeviantART may not be used or reproduced in any form without my written permission
Related content
Comments: 52

JACAC In reply to ??? [2016-04-29 08:24:21 +0000 UTC]

t h a n k . y o u . f o r . y o u r . i n t e r p r e t a t i o n .
y o u . s a w . w h a t . i . s a w . w h e n . i . t o o k . i t
a b o u t . t h e . c o m p o s i t i o n . i . m u s t . t oo k . i t . l i k e . t h i s . i f . i . o p e n . t h e . v i e w . t h e r e . a r e . a . l o t . o f . d is t u r b i n g . "things" . a r o u n d .
y o u . c o u l d . m a k e . t h i s . c o m m e n t . a s . a . "critique"
i . w i l l . t r y . m y . b e s t ...
r e g a r d s

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tuntalm In reply to JACAC [2016-04-29 18:07:41 +0000 UTC]

I thought I didn't know enough about photography to post a critique, but yes... Next time, I will for sure !

Yes, I understand. Disturbing things can ruin a piece, so it depends on which aspect you wanted to highlight.

But, it stays a very good shot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tuntalm [2016-05-02 09:34:09 +0000 UTC]

e v e r y b o d y . c a n . m a k e . a . "critique" a n d . y o u . d i d . i t . v e r y . w e l l . a s . a . c o m m e n t .
a s . a n . a r c h i t e c t . i . t r y . m y . b e s t . c o m p o s i t i o n . o n . m y . p h o t o s .
t h a n k . y o u .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tuntalm In reply to JACAC [2016-05-02 15:52:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I am glad it helped you out !

Yes, I noticed it I think the structure is very important in a piece, no matter the medium or the theme. Good to hear this is one of your priorities in art !

You're very welcome, dear ~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tuntalm [2016-05-04 13:12:38 +0000 UTC]

s u r e . d i d .
r i g h t ! i . a l w a y s . t r y . t o . m a k e . a . g o o d . c o m p o s i t i o n . w i t h o u t . l o o s e . t h e . i d e a . o r . t h e . m o m e n tΒ 
i t ' s . n i c e . t o . "talk" w i t h . y o u .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tuntalm In reply to JACAC [2016-05-04 13:25:37 +0000 UTC]

Yep ! Structured pieces can seem less dynamic and loose the "movement" you caught in the first place. It does it a lot with drawings, as I know. The 5-minute sketches are always more interesting and alive than the 25-hour pieces with a lot of work. Because working on a piece always erase some of the "imperfections" which create the interesting side of it. Is it the same with photography ?

Thank you ! I like talking to you too Conversations are always interesting !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tuntalm [2016-05-04 14:14:07 +0000 UTC]

i . l i k e . t w o . t y p e s . o f . p h o t o s
s t r e e t . a n d . t h a t . i s . r e a l l y . c a t c h . a . m o m e n t . a . f e e l i n g . a . s t o r y . i t ' s . q u i c k . p h o t o . a n d . a . q u i c k . b r a i n . a c t i v i t y . t o . c o m p o s e . i t . t h e . b e s t . w a y
a r c h i t e c t u r e . a l w a y s . o r . a l m o s t . a l w a y s . m i x e d . w i t h . p e o p l e . t h a t . w a s . m y . l a s t . b o o k . a n d . t h a n . i . c a n . w a i t . f o r . t h e . b e s t . m o m e n t

m a y . i . c o r r e c t . y o u ? "c o n v e r s a t i o n . w i t h . s m a r t . p e o p l e . a r e . a l w a y sΒ  . i n t e r e s t i n gt"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tuntalm In reply to JACAC [2016-05-04 14:19:15 +0000 UTC]

I also like "urban" photos more than the other ones. Because we can see humans in their daily environment, our daily environment, and notice things we wouldn't even look at when caught in daily life. I find it great to sublime regular environments as if it was something we would never see again.

Why did you entitle it "Ghosts" ? In reference of all the unknown human shadows crossing your camera, or for another reason ?

Haha ! That's true ! But simple minds can be interesting to figure out too. They aren't always as "obvious" as we think they are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tuntalm [2016-05-04 14:28:14 +0000 UTC]

y o u . a r e . r i g h t . a n d . i . a g r e e .
r i g h t . a g a i n . i . a l w a y s . w a i t . f o r . s h a d o w s . i n . t h e . a r c h i t e c t u r e . t h e n . t h e . t i t l e . i s . t h e r e .
u f ! r i g h t . a g a i n .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tuntalm In reply to JACAC [2016-05-04 14:51:28 +0000 UTC]

Do you think architecture without people is less interesting ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tuntalm [2016-05-04 15:47:25 +0000 UTC]

s o m e t i m e s . p e o p l e . i s . n o t . g o o d . f o r . a r c h i t e c t u r e . b u t . f o r . s u r e . a r c h i t e c t u r e . i s . f o r . p e o p l e .
i f . w e . l o o k . i t . a s . a . p i e c e . o f . a r t . i t ' s . b e t t e r . w i t h o u t . p e o p l e . b u t . a s . a r c h i t e c t u r e . i s . p a r t . o f . o u r . l i f e . w e l c o m e . t o . p e o p l e .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tuntalm In reply to JACAC [2016-05-04 15:52:48 +0000 UTC]

Depends on what you want to show : people's environment, or shapes and colours of architecture. Maybe we can't access the full beauty of architecture by letting people introduce themselves in the photo, but it is difficult to relate architecture to our daily lives without people. If that makes any sense

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tuntalm [2016-05-05 10:46:11 +0000 UTC]

n o t . e a s y . f o r . s u r e .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tuntalm In reply to JACAC [2016-05-05 11:26:49 +0000 UTC]

Indeed !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tuntalm [2016-05-05 15:37:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JocelyneR [2016-03-10 05:53:02 +0000 UTC]

Haha! Well seen!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to JocelyneR [2016-03-10 10:21:24 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JonnyGoodboy [2016-03-08 20:52:53 +0000 UTC]

Jose!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to JonnyGoodboy [2016-03-09 08:59:48 +0000 UTC]

h e h e . Jonathan

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Soupahgrheane [2016-03-08 13:15:37 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Soupahgrheane [2016-03-08 13:42:14 +0000 UTC]

t h a n k . y o u .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zeus609 [2016-03-08 04:59:17 +0000 UTC]

Cheer up there is always tomorrow

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Zeus609 [2016-03-08 09:17:03 +0000 UTC]

s u r e .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MarcosRodriguez [2016-03-07 22:57:58 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to MarcosRodriguez [2016-03-08 09:16:54 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jesseboy000 [2016-03-07 20:30:22 +0000 UTC]

cool find Jose! it seems like it is about to make him smile

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to jesseboy000 [2016-03-08 09:16:48 +0000 UTC]

t h a n k . y o u . Jess .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LindArtz [2016-03-07 19:10:41 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to LindArtz [2016-03-08 09:16:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ansdesign [2016-03-07 17:55:20 +0000 UTC]

No, I wouldn't smile either, if someone on the wall would scream...hey, here's the next one to put a fork in. Β  Β 
Is there a kind of cannibalism in Lisbon?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to ansdesign [2016-03-08 09:16:27 +0000 UTC]

h e h e
i t ' s . t r a d i t i o n . h e r e .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ansdesign In reply to JACAC [2016-03-08 17:15:18 +0000 UTC]

Dangerous city... Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to ansdesign [2016-03-09 09:13:55 +0000 UTC]

s u r e . i s .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

seek-and-hide [2016-03-07 17:44:12 +0000 UTC]

Eu concordo com a nossa amiga Lúcia. Ele parece sorrir de uma maneira contida. Uma bela composição de imagem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to seek-and-hide [2016-03-08 09:15:55 +0000 UTC]

p o i s . e u . n Γ£ o ... a c r e d i t e m . q u e . e l e . i a . s Γ© r i o . e . n e m . r e p a r o u . n e m . n a . p a r e d e . n e m . e m . m i m ..
o b r i g a d o .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

seek-and-hide In reply to JACAC [2016-03-08 17:34:05 +0000 UTC]

O prazer Γ© todo nosso. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to seek-and-hide [2016-03-09 09:12:57 +0000 UTC]

e g o Γ­ s t a .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

seek-and-hide In reply to JACAC [2016-03-09 16:43:55 +0000 UTC]

Com moderação, não faz mal para ninguém  !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to seek-and-hide [2016-03-10 10:36:43 +0000 UTC]

h e h e .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tigles1Artistry [2016-03-07 17:24:06 +0000 UTC]

...... great capture dear JosΓ©....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tigles1Artistry [2016-03-08 09:14:59 +0000 UTC]

h e h e
t h a n k . y o u . Teresa

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tigles1Artistry In reply to JACAC [2016-03-08 18:27:01 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome dear JosΓ©..... Β 

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Tigles1Artistry [2016-03-09 09:10:13 +0000 UTC]

a n d . s o . d o . y o u . d e a r . Teresa

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Arte-de-Junqueiro [2016-03-07 16:30:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to Arte-de-Junqueiro [2016-03-07 16:34:37 +0000 UTC]

m o r e . o r . l e s s .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

m-lucia [2016-03-07 16:22:18 +0000 UTC]

acho que ele começou mesmo a esboçar um sorriso...! fantÑstica foto...!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to m-lucia [2016-03-07 16:27:10 +0000 UTC]

n Γ£ o . m e . p a r e c e .
o b r i g a d o

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

m-lucia In reply to JACAC [2016-03-07 16:30:13 +0000 UTC]

tens que olhar melhor...
de nada

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JACAC In reply to m-lucia [2016-03-07 16:31:41 +0000 UTC]

v o u . f a z e r . z o o m .
d e . t u d o .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Batsceba [2016-03-07 16:14:00 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>