Comments: 35
Zonerider [2020-05-18 12:49:15 +0000 UTC]
Very cool, that can i made not with my hardware.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mxmx [2012-04-25 08:39:37 +0000 UTC]
Very nice. Can a camera lens actually contribute to the quality and scale of viewing through a telescope? - almost like a large eyepiece? Was this taken with your own telescope?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
insomniaworks In reply to mxmx [2012-04-25 16:23:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks alot! Yes this image was taken using my own telescope.
I do not know of any company that produces an adapter to attach a DSLR camera lens to the telescope. There are some made for point and shoot digital cameras though. You can get an eyepiece adapter for your DSLR so you can image through an eyepiece(Eyepiece Projection Method).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mxmx In reply to insomniaworks [2012-04-26 09:03:28 +0000 UTC]
Yes...but what i mean is that when one adds a camera into the equation, does it not create more magnification in total? I have seem some people build custom camera eyepiece holders...But what I'm wondering is whether a normal eyepiece create less power in the telescope, than when a camera is also attached....basically like a super large eyepiece
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
insomniaworks In reply to mxmx [2012-04-28 03:10:49 +0000 UTC]
Like I said I do not believe that anyone makes something to mate a DSLR and its lens to a telescope. If you could it would definately increase the focal length and thus the Power of the system.
My camera is not a full frame(35mm equivalent). I shoot prime focus and my main imaging scope has a 1000mm focal length, you then multiply by 1.6 to get the total focal length of the system. So my scope/camera combination has an effective focal length of 1600mm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
insomniaworks In reply to Black-Richa [2011-10-23 12:29:48 +0000 UTC]
The CCCA is our clubs dark sky site in Southern Ontario, Canada.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
insomniaworks In reply to Black-Richa [2011-10-23 19:35:26 +0000 UTC]
CCCA actually stands for...Chippawa Creek Conservation Area. The conservation authority leases us the land our observatories are on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RayM0506 [2011-09-21 19:30:48 +0000 UTC]
All your work is fantastic. I just went digital myself so I am hoping to get some better images here myself! Haveing a bit of a hard time in DSS, but I will figure it out. LOL Once again, INCREDIBLE work! You give me a goal to shoot for! No pun intended. LOL
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vaticinium [2011-07-11 20:43:13 +0000 UTC]
awesome pic, excellant resolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Todd-Sullest [2011-07-04 23:56:19 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful catch! Your field of view is absolutely astounding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
darkmoonphoto [2011-07-02 23:26:40 +0000 UTC]
Good job.
I am going to try a number of these images myself next dark moon. I am thinking a 6 inch F/6. All my 8-inch scopes are long focal lengths. 8 - F/10.
Rikk ...................
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EarthKnight [2011-07-02 12:33:20 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CapturingTheNight In reply to insomniaworks [2011-07-02 23:11:43 +0000 UTC]
I hope the weather held for you Mark. Can't wait to see your Trifid shot. I was all setup to do the Jewel Box in the Southern Cross last night when three exposures in the clouds rolled over. Grrrrr.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
insomniaworks In reply to CapturingTheNight [2011-07-03 02:52:02 +0000 UTC]
Sorry to hear that Greg. Don't feel to bad the weather turned to crap again here as well. Midnights this week so no joy for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CapturingTheNight In reply to insomniaworks [2011-07-03 03:59:41 +0000 UTC]
Sorry to hear that as well Mark. Looking at the forecast here, I won't be setting up the scope again for at least a week.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1