Comments: 67
Redforce059 [2020-05-12 21:32:41 +0000 UTC]
Nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
scorpionlover42 [2020-04-04 16:09:27 +0000 UTC]
The idea of tigers crossing into North America and establishing breeding populations is indeed interesting, and this picture fuels that interest.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
bubul1986 [2020-04-03 04:59:52 +0000 UTC]
good
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BrandonScottPilcher [2020-04-03 02:13:16 +0000 UTC]
Ironically, there are currently more tigers in the United States than there are left in the wild in Asia.
www.nationalgeographic.com/ani…
Unfortunately, most of them don't exactly live in ideal conditions...
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
Pookie-2-Steph [2020-04-02 23:15:50 +0000 UTC]
This is striking!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex [2020-04-02 20:15:42 +0000 UTC]
I ended up adding the alaskan tiger information to Wikipedia when I found out about it.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
HodariNundu In reply to Saberrex [2020-04-02 20:18:57 +0000 UTC]
Where did you find about it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Saberrex In reply to HodariNundu [2020-04-03 16:54:21 +0000 UTC]
The book "The Big Cats and their Fossil Relatives" by Alan Turner and Mauricio Anton.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HodariNundu In reply to DenistheTyrant [2020-04-03 20:05:51 +0000 UTC]
No, we're talking about the potential real life tiger, not a cryptid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DenistheTyrant In reply to HodariNundu [2020-04-04 01:52:33 +0000 UTC]
Then I dunno. Because Alaskan Tiger is a cryptid but never heard of the prehistoric version. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bhut [2020-04-02 19:49:16 +0000 UTC]
That would’ve been cool actually!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Painterlyphotobomer [2020-04-02 19:05:46 +0000 UTC]
The eyes make this Alaskan tiger look quite possessed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Javor911 [2020-04-02 17:55:19 +0000 UTC]
You should color more of your old doodles! It's great!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HodariNundu In reply to DenistheTyrant [2020-04-02 17:58:39 +0000 UTC]
Sadly, even if those fossils were actually tigers (which apparently hasn't been proven), it wouldn't seem like they were abundant (not unlike dholes, another iconic Asian species that arrived to North America during the Pleistocene).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brutonyx [2020-04-02 15:45:52 +0000 UTC]
The whole idea is based on Herrington (1986, 1987). It has been commented favorably by Turner and Antón (1997) and mentioned in this blog post by Darren Naish in 2007 scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoolo… .
As far as I know, no formal disprooval or reanalysis of the findings exists (the thing is still mentioned in the tiger Wikipedia page), but given how old the original studys are, I can't help but being a little skeptical: a reanalysis of the case (perhaps with a nice DNA analysis) would be very welcome.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
PaleoTiger [2020-04-02 13:22:51 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
XenoTeeth3 [2020-04-02 12:47:14 +0000 UTC]
SpongeBob : it was an Alaskan bull tiger !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kingrexy [2020-04-02 11:24:03 +0000 UTC]
You really nail the feeling of atmosphere in your works man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PerfectChaos22 [2020-04-02 11:19:16 +0000 UTC]
I think there actually are sightings of tigers in some parts of Alaska, sorta like cryptid sightings i guess
👍: 2 ⏩: 2
PerfectChaos22 In reply to badboy1817 [2020-04-02 14:34:05 +0000 UTC]
Kinda hard to mistake a wolf for a tiger.....
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
ThalassoAtrox [2020-04-02 10:29:13 +0000 UTC]
If you're looking for tigers hunting bison, the Caspian tiger and Caucasian wisent did that until a few centuries ago in western Asia, Asiatic lions also got in on the bison hunting there, as well as the Balkans.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>