HOME | DD

Epogh In reply to fractal1 [2012-02-02 08:25:51 +0000 UTC]

I love what you did Im gona pong back .
To get the thumnail veiw in your post just copy the thumb link on the right just above statistics and past it in your post easy as that.
I love this pong stuff its a great way to lurn from others and grow together.
This is a great flame

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fractal1 In reply to Epogh [2012-02-03 01:09:45 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it! I appreciate the compliment very much.
That's easy with the thumbnail! Thank you! Do you happen to know what the Link box on the right (above the Thumb box) is for?
"Ponging" is fun! I feel that I don't know enough about the Editor yet, though. I just sort of try this and then try that. Must learn more!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Epogh In reply to fractal1 [2012-02-03 07:59:30 +0000 UTC]

Thats how we all play with Apo bit of this and a bit of that but If you do it enough you start to understand why what happens.
Just go for it together we grow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fractal1 In reply to Epogh [2012-02-05 03:03:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Epogh In reply to kram666 [2012-01-30 21:08:29 +0000 UTC]

Tweak tweak

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Epogh In reply to Free2BeDesigns [2012-01-30 06:44:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanx my friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Epogh In reply to fractal1 [2012-01-30 06:46:22 +0000 UTC]

I removed the blur even small amounts get it out of focus and changed some vars and tx positions

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

fractal1 In reply to Epogh [2012-02-02 07:32:52 +0000 UTC]

P.S. "Motion" has this haze over the spiral sections.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Epogh In reply to fractal1 [2012-02-02 08:12:38 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes great detail looks hazy if not rendered correctly try densedy at 10 000 just tipe it in there and oversample 2.
It takes longer but gives the detail or use chaotica and take it to Sample Level 13.I persomaly rather post a small well rendered flame than a big not so nice one.
Have fun I hope it helps

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

fractal1 In reply to Epogh [2012-02-05 19:26:04 +0000 UTC]

Okay, I'll try going up to density 10,000 more often. My usual is 7000. I'm still wondering about the effect of the oversample setting. I usually use 3, but don't notice much difference when I use 2. What I could do is render the same fractal twice using different setings. Then I might be able to see the difference.
I have several smallish fractals in my gallery. The main reason they're little is that they needed to be smoothed out more. They're small, but cute!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fractal1 In reply to Epogh [2012-02-05 19:25:15 +0000 UTC]

Okay, I'll try going up to density 10,000 more often. My usual is 7000. I'm still wondering about the effect of the oversample setting. I usually use 3, but don't notice much difference when I use 2. What I could do is render the same fractal twice using different setings. Then I might be able to see the difference.
I have several smallish fractals in my gallery. The main reason they're little is that they needed to be smoothed out more. They're small, but cute!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fractal1 In reply to Epogh [2012-02-01 23:25:30 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I had a good look at what you changed. Interesting! It made a big difference,removing the blur. That's a tip I'll remember.
What can we do if most of the fractal is covered with a kind of rough haze? I'm not sure whether you know what I mean, but this "haziness" happens to my fractals all the time. Some scripts seem especially prone to it. I rarely use those scripts, despite their being excellent otherwise. I've tried lowering the gamma setting, but it doesn't make enough of a difference.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Epogh In reply to fractal1 [2012-02-02 08:07:38 +0000 UTC]

Try and resize transforms make them smaller for fokus.
A script that makes haze or unfukused images is not realy nice .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fractal1 In reply to Epogh [2012-02-05 19:19:06 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for this great tip! I'll try it. I almost cringe when I see the Apo "haze." It feels like chalk scraping across a chalkboard!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Epogh In reply to fractal1 [2012-02-06 21:45:53 +0000 UTC]

Yea I feel it to

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Epogh In reply to catelee2u [2012-01-29 20:30:27 +0000 UTC]

Sweet thanx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Epogh In reply to Lady-Compassion [2012-01-29 20:13:17 +0000 UTC]

A tweak of that script and fractal1 Its the first time she posts params on DA.I had to tweak it some.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0