Comments: 205
yunusbir [2015-06-02 08:36:09 +0000 UTC]
Loo Awsome
Soo Beautiful, So Sexy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Athlonite [2014-12-02 06:59:17 +0000 UTC]
Just outta curiosity have you ever had any of those moles checked out for melanoma...
also your an extremely sexy woman
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
H17L3Rloveyou [2014-07-26 14:39:35 +0000 UTC]
Oh si que sexy con esa cara de mierda y esa piel aun peor que asco das japuta
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
M2u555 [2014-07-06 21:21:24 +0000 UTC]
waaaaw
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bare2510 [2014-02-07 03:40:05 +0000 UTC]
15 mins of Fame or ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Robocasper [2014-02-06 04:24:10 +0000 UTC]
and quit putting your website on pics...I use them for my wallpaper and not to sale -lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BruceHulkBanner [2014-02-04 16:46:58 +0000 UTC]
nice pose love the color top you have on
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
adifwk [2014-02-03 11:31:59 +0000 UTC]
very sexy, great picture
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
xtrememasseur [2014-02-03 07:28:44 +0000 UTC]
u r damn sexy.......making me feel
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Icedancer79 [2014-02-02 15:45:36 +0000 UTC]
I have seen many pictures here on DA that are out right disgusting and in no shape artistic, in my opinion, but to actually say that the pictures this girl has on here
are vile, I really will disagree, none of her pictures show her in some type of pose that I would consider porn. As a matter of fact talking from an artist point of view
it's pictures like this that a lot of us artists would use as reference at times. It's also so rude to call her obese and ugly, if all of you who are saying this are true artists
you would know that beauty comes in many forms, giving a good critique on how she may be able to improve her pictures and give them more interest is a more
mature way to approach things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Doctor-N0 [2014-02-02 12:42:47 +0000 UTC]
I am not against the good quality pictures with real models.
This girl is obese, ugly and this mediocre photo quality made by a cell phone.
It's simple I take a picture of my girlfriend naked, touching her pussy, and sell it here for 50$!
Over time they make the audience .. men looking for sex scour the web .. look, this girl whatchers: Empty profiles without any art .. 40 50 years old alone in front of their computer. .
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Cycaladrielle In reply to Doctor-N0 [2015-05-06 03:18:15 +0000 UTC]
Obese?! Wtf dude?? You could have said overweight but obese? Thats ridiculus.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Junipers-Knot [2014-02-02 00:19:53 +0000 UTC]
Flagged as Spam
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Doctor-N0 In reply to Junipers-Knot [2014-02-02 03:30:03 +0000 UTC]
Adult oriented / sexual toys used (Explicit use of "adult toys" including dildos, strap-ons, vibrators, etc.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Junipers-Knot In reply to Doctor-N0 [2014-02-02 03:53:15 +0000 UTC]
^+2
It's a shame that DA is being infested with such vile materials.
Maybe I should start an anti-idiocy group on DA. I just might actually
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Doctor-N0 In reply to Junipers-Knot [2014-02-02 12:49:41 +0000 UTC]
i think its will god to make a petition or something like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Junipers-Knot In reply to Doctor-N0 [2014-02-02 15:30:58 +0000 UTC]
I can make a group then and creae a shared google docs document so people can sign it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
elenche [2014-02-02 00:08:57 +0000 UTC]
Why oh why? This is an art website - people expect to see art on the front page, not something that looks like a screenshot from homemade porn. And this goes for your other pictures as well, from what I dare to see. And sure, erotic art is fine but to say this is erotic art is like saying a generic tourist picture of the Eiffel tower, that is out of focus, where the tower's top is cut out and you can see some sweaty people covering half of it should be classified as a masterpiece and be put in the Louvre. So I see your arguments about erotic art very irrelevant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
sandor09 [2014-02-01 23:03:43 +0000 UTC]
Perfection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>