HOME | DD

DeviantLilith — But who will open the doors for me?

Published: 2012-02-05 16:23:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 4167; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description A moment in U-bahn.
Related content
Comments: 19

Accrodelajupe [2016-04-24 05:10:53 +0000 UTC]

Many people are fascinated by the idea of accompanying someone who has consented to be helpless. 

Imagine a scenario which is completely platonic, with a volunteer aged over 18; as well as being restricted by feminine clothes, the subject will blind, deaf, dumb and unable to help herself.

Here are some thoughts on how to create a possible scenario in real life.  The goal here is to CONCEAL from all casual observers that the volunteer is artificially handicapped. 


First of all, the volunteer should be thoroughly gagged, in a manner that cannot be removed simply by pushing with the tongue:

pbs.twimg.com/media/BhQ76nMCQA…


The next step is to impede their hearing:

thebestearplugs.com/wp-content…

and then s7d5.scene7.com/is/image/overl…


Now, judiciously add scarves to CONCEAL the fact that they’re deaf and dumb:

www.flickr.com/photos/71389084…


Extra layers will further reduce their hearing: eventually a coat worn with the hood up, over the scarves.


Next, discreetly blindfold them:

www.promed.ie/shop/assets/cata…

(subject no 1: ) www.fotech.cl/wp-content/uploa…

(subject no 2: ) cuatrostatic-a.akamaihd.net/21…


Now, judiciously add sunglasses to CONCEAL that they’re blind:

(subject no 1: ) i.ytimg.com/vi/ImXDw_K7IdE/max…

(subject no 2: ) cuatrostatic-a.akamaihd.net/21…


The subject can now evidently still FEEL their way around a room but ideally should have another person (you!) to lead them everywhere, arm-in-arm.  You’ll need to have previously agreed a code of non-verbal, non-visual communication, for example, gently tapping their arm when they should start or stop walking, veer to the left or right, etc. 


On a cold winter’s day, your now-blind, deaf and dumb companion could therefore be dressed to go out
looking something like this, and no casual observer should be any the wiser:

www.flickr.com/photos/52921310…


In this state of sensory deprivation, it would evidently be much safer for your companion to walk slowly.  This may be ensured if she wears a narrow skirt or concealed narrow petticoat, to deliberately restrict the size of their steps:

fetishnormal.wordpress.com/200…

www.flickr.com/photos/24768491…


Finally, to prevent “cheating”, it is essential to discreetly deprive her of the use of their hands.  One possible method is shown in the following video.  The subject here is in fact a genetic male who is thus forced to wear women’s clothes until released.  However, this is CONCEALED from all casual observers; the dénouement is at the end:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=K56RJB…


(This person is wearing a full-body catsuit under their dress, which is thicker than normal tights and gives more protection against the cold, but imposes a whole additional constraint if worn all day long).

 

Impeded by restrictive female clothing and with their wrists invisibly secured beneath their coat, your blind, deaf and dumb companion is thus also physically handicapped.  (Some people may of course find extra allure in having a male companion who is feminised and helpless).


In summary, in real life it would clearly be easiest to combine all these aspects on a bright, sunny, cold winter’s day.  Practice would be needed.  Nevertheless it should ultimately be possible to go for a walk outside.  Any casual observers will see your companion in long skirt, hands in coat pockets, wearing scarves, sunglasses, hat or hood.  However, as you and your silent companion stroll slowly along together, arm-in-arm, only the two of you will have the excitement of knowing that such observers will not immediately realise that she is blind, deaf, dumb, physically handicapped, forcibly feminised and completely helpless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Amber84 [2013-09-02 17:01:29 +0000 UTC]

always dreamt to see something like that.. and of course doing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gnaedigerherr In reply to Amber84 [2013-09-03 20:45:50 +0000 UTC]

So, come to Kreuzberg (Berlin)!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Amber84 In reply to Gnaedigerherr [2013-09-04 17:19:34 +0000 UTC]

ok! can i get anklecuffs in public too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gnaedigerherr In reply to Amber84 [2013-09-04 20:36:24 +0000 UTC]

Shure, it´s a must! And that´s why we take the subway. By foot it would take to long.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Amber84 In reply to Gnaedigerherr [2013-09-05 05:58:58 +0000 UTC]

perfect!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gnaedigerherr [2013-09-02 09:10:14 +0000 UTC]

Kreuzberg is always worth a travel!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeviantLilith In reply to Gnaedigerherr [2014-01-04 18:08:44 +0000 UTC]

For sure is!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

missruthietv [2012-11-14 01:55:51 +0000 UTC]

Wow, love this, it's so subtle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

uksmile [2012-11-11 08:41:04 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gnaedigerherr [2012-11-09 17:17:42 +0000 UTC]

Obviously a case of neighbourly help! Keep on, please!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

emmapeeler65 [2012-02-14 19:26:41 +0000 UTC]

Super Idee!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dragonofmarz2343 [2012-02-09 19:58:47 +0000 UTC]

I wonder how it feels to be there in public with the fetish. *murr*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mikesolo66 [2012-02-06 23:05:56 +0000 UTC]

More public submission for Lilith would indeed be something to see...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeviantLilith In reply to mikesolo66 [2012-02-07 19:55:45 +0000 UTC]

What would be more public than a metro station? City hall stairs

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mandyandmike In reply to DeviantLilith [2012-02-08 10:02:48 +0000 UTC]

You misunderstand my comment, I simply meant more of it! A metro station is public enough!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeviantLilith In reply to mandyandmike [2012-02-08 19:25:01 +0000 UTC]

Haha, now I get it Let's see what's there to come...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cibazoll [2012-02-06 12:53:03 +0000 UTC]

you took it to the next level, nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeviantLilith In reply to cibazoll [2012-02-07 19:56:20 +0000 UTC]

Glad you're liking it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0