HOME | DD

csd0916 — Mitosis by-nc

Published: 2010-01-04 19:45:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 1895; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 185
Redirect to original
Description

By the way this took like 3 days to render
Related content

csd0916 - Tornado Theory

csd0916 - Spinning Straw Into Gold

csd0916 - Cell Defense

csd0916 - Infusion

csd0916 - Fire

csd0916 - Chronologic

csd0916 - Electricity

csd0916 - Up

csd0916 - Lift Off

talin4 - Crash

ChaosFissure - Oceanic Treasures

CabinTom - Factory Floor

frekie999 - Julia's Copper

Shortgreenpigg - Brass Machine

KbCaO - Nebular Corpses

obeyyourmaster - Creep in

Jeddaka - Glass Stained Amphitheater

TheMasterBaron - Dream Machine
Comments: 14

singularitycomplex [2010-04-11 12:53:04 +0000 UTC]

I've only been using apophysis for a couple of weeks now, but I've been living and breathing it (ask my girlfriend) ; I zoomed in all the way once, and it only took me about 7 or so hours to render , how high did you have the quality/depth set too? It doesn't effect the memory usage, but it does effect render time. Usually I render print quality fractals at 3200x4800 and it only takes around 6 hours. I used to set it at 1000, but I did a test on small images, and there doesn't seem to be a difference between 1000 and 250, but those tests were done at 990x660 res, I would assume the larger the image the more noticeable changes would be but I haven't test that yet. Also, deepbluerenegade is right, scaling does the same thing,though again I THINK it effects overall quality, but on an image this small I don't think you would notice, just up the q/d or image size to compensate and it will still render faster.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

csd0916 In reply to singularitycomplex [2010-04-12 19:19:59 +0000 UTC]

I had the quality set to 2000 and the depth at 32-bit integer. I haven't played around with anything higher than 1280x(whatever) yet but I still have all my original parameters if I want to make some prints.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

singularitycomplex In reply to csd0916 [2010-04-12 21:21:06 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, you should drop the quality down to 1000 at the highest, that'll halve the time it takes to render. Think of it like this: if you have the quality set to 1000 and are rendering an image that is 900x900, rendering the same size image at 2000 quality is like rendering a 1800x1800 image at 1000 quality and scaling it down. I asked the guy who made Apophysis 7x if using a higher integer effects the image, and he said no but that some people say it's faster (i couldn't tell a difference). Everything in my Gallery was rendered at 1000, you should check it out. < (please forgive the shameless plug)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

deepbluerenegade [2010-04-09 19:29:09 +0000 UTC]

3 Days???

How large of an image? It seems like you didn't get your money's worth.

Did you use post-process render?

Molly : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

csd0916 In reply to deepbluerenegade [2010-04-09 20:27:20 +0000 UTC]

no post-process...maybe just an over-taxed laptop processor was the culprit. The image here is full sized, 1280x942. I think I had zoomed in to near maximum for this particular one too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deepbluerenegade In reply to csd0916 [2010-04-09 20:35:41 +0000 UTC]

hmmmm,

In the future, don't use zoom, use the scaling. I think you will find that it does the same thing but renders way faster.

I'm sad because the quality looks low, but the render time is already ridiculous.

Molly : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DwarfVaderRus [2010-04-09 18:54:47 +0000 UTC]

Awesome
What are your specs?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

csd0916 In reply to DwarfVaderRus [2010-04-09 20:27:48 +0000 UTC]

made it in apo 3D-Hack and brightened the colors in photoshop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DwarfVaderRus In reply to csd0916 [2010-04-09 20:59:37 +0000 UTC]

Ok
Though I asked for your system configuration, this was helpful too Where can I find apo 3D-Hack?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

csd0916 In reply to DwarfVaderRus [2010-04-10 00:19:40 +0000 UTC]

well there's a new version now but just google Apophysis and you can get it, it's free. the computer that rendered this was running windows xp media center edition sp3, 1 GB memory, it's a dell inspiron 1505...I dunno whatever else you want to know I'll tell you I guess

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DwarfVaderRus In reply to csd0916 [2010-04-12 15:13:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks
Lol sorry for the super-slow reply

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SyphonLetter [2010-04-09 18:52:43 +0000 UTC]

This is awesome dude =O

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

csd0916 In reply to SyphonLetter [2010-04-09 20:27:55 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SyphonLetter In reply to csd0916 [2010-04-09 21:55:24 +0000 UTC]

yw friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 0