HOME | DD

ChompWorks β€” Beastling

#beastling #girl #monster
Published: 2016-09-28 18:33:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 4451; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 67
Redirect to original
Description Just a little drawing on a monster girl. Beastlings fall somewhere in-between a human and a werewolf. They have small fangs and claws and have large ears. Though unlike humans they are carnivorous and only seek plants for medicinal purposes. They have been described as both blood-hungry monsters and puppy-like, depending on the situation and people involved.
Related content
Comments: 18

bob-waffleson [2016-09-29 01:01:07 +0000 UTC]

We are born of the blood, Made men by the blood, undone by the blood; Our eyes are yet to open... fear the old blood.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to bob-waffleson [2016-09-29 01:02:48 +0000 UTC]

i take it that's a werewolf thing?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bob-waffleson In reply to ChompWorks [2016-09-29 02:58:38 +0000 UTC]

ehh, close enough. it's from bloodborne. a game about the power of blood, and how one can easily teeter off into bloddlust,Β and transmogrifying intoΒ a beast. there's also some lovecraft in there with inhuman things (not all of which have tendrils, they did a good job with that) being treated as gods and stuff. The gameplay itself is kinda wonky but the lore is amazing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

The90sDoggo [2016-09-28 18:50:54 +0000 UTC]

Good job

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to The90sDoggo [2016-09-28 18:52:44 +0000 UTC]

thanx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

firefightandothers [2016-09-28 18:41:11 +0000 UTC]

Beastlings have dominent(sic) DNA and a child born from a beastling and a human will always be another beastling.Unless the parent beastling was born from such a human/beastling union, in which case there's a roughly 50% chance of the child being human.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to firefightandothers [2016-09-28 18:43:35 +0000 UTC]

aah i should have mentioned that the hereditary traits for beastling don't work exactly the same as a human. It's not to be judged based on our actual system of heredity.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

firefightandothers In reply to ChompWorks [2016-09-28 18:50:34 +0000 UTC]

I'm afraid that's not gonna fly. Your description explicitly mentions it's because beastling DNA is dominant. That means it's based on exactly the same thing as hereditary traits in humans.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to firefightandothers [2016-09-28 18:52:39 +0000 UTC]

ok i know it doesn't make sense but i also don't care, it's fantasy lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

firefightandothers In reply to ChompWorks [2016-09-28 18:55:13 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, well, I like picking apart fantasy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to firefightandothers [2016-09-28 18:58:09 +0000 UTC]

i figured

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

firefightandothers In reply to ChompWorks [2016-09-28 19:01:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to firefightandothers [2016-09-28 19:03:50 +0000 UTC]

well how would YOU explain the fact that beastlings only produce beastlings but can mate with humans? lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

firefightandothers In reply to ChompWorks [2016-09-28 19:07:45 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't. I would make it the way I explained it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to firefightandothers [2016-09-28 19:08:29 +0000 UTC]

You mean logically? where's the fun in that?! lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

firefightandothers In reply to ChompWorks [2016-09-28 19:09:47 +0000 UTC]

Again, that is what I do for fun.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChompWorks In reply to firefightandothers [2016-09-28 19:13:40 +0000 UTC]

again i knew it'd have to work that way but hey.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

firefightandothers In reply to ChompWorks [2016-09-28 19:16:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0