HOME | DD

argwohn β€” Comfort

Published: 2011-01-19 02:28:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 2396; Favourites: 49; Downloads: 24
Redirect to original
Description Some months after Mary's death Watson is coming to terms with his recent losses and discovers that fate hasn't robbed him of everyone he cared about. Solace comes in many guises. Also, getting drunk with an Inspector of the Yard shouldn't be that much fun

Though Lestrade at least is rather a bit farther gone than he had planned lol. Ending up where he is now wasn't really his intention, but it's not his fault that the floor can't keep from swaying under his feet. It's really much more sensible to stay where he is for a while. Falling down was such an unpleasant sensation after all, and his current position is just so comfortable and Watson doesn't mind x3
Related content
Comments: 33

ladyblackbird13 [2015-09-28 20:38:05 +0000 UTC]

Fantastisch! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dogmatil [2013-10-06 17:33:35 +0000 UTC]

Aww this is so adorable! Especially the way Lestrade looks at Watson. Such a trusting and loving expression. In my canon Lestrade and Watson became best friends during Holmes' hiatus. (though I do admit, I'd wish it would be Holmes instead of Lestrade) Β 


Ich find das Bild wirklich toll! Und ich sehe darin wirklich nichts was irgendwie gay ist. Ich kann mir das super vorstellen, wie Lestrade schwankend aufsteht und dann sich plΓΆtzlich zwischen Watson's Beinen wiederfindet

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gravelgirty [2011-07-06 17:33:13 +0000 UTC]

I've had moments exactly like that!!! Watson's face is just sweet all over!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to gravelgirty [2011-07-12 16:11:00 +0000 UTC]

Lucky you! ;D
Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

goldenfire124 [2011-06-03 12:19:32 +0000 UTC]

I love this picture I wasn't a fan of watson/lestrade until I found your art of them. Though I can admit to dabbling in Holmes/Watson/Lestrade off and on, because SOMEONE had to be there for watson when holmes went and offed himself at Reichenbach Falls. My headcanon has the 3 staying together after Holmes returns so I guess it would be Holmes/Watson, Watson/Lestrade, then Holmes/Watson/Lestrade lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to goldenfire124 [2011-06-05 21:04:44 +0000 UTC]

Aw Thank you so much!
I'm glad I could drag you into another fandom xD it's so small, I'm always delighted about new additions. Welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WrongSideOfThePond [2011-03-20 08:54:13 +0000 UTC]

It's too early in the morning for me to come up with a more intelligent-sounding word than "adorable," so that's what I'm going to call this. Because it is. <3

And their faces look really good, especially Lestrade's.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to WrongSideOfThePond [2011-03-26 12:58:31 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GallifreyanGeek [2011-01-31 22:25:51 +0000 UTC]

Aww Lestrade looks very cute <3
All that's missing is Tik Tok or something like that playing in the background xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to GallifreyanGeek [2011-02-01 14:47:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

And-Reichenbach-Fell [2011-01-30 10:42:56 +0000 UTC]

FFF. I don't know *why* I adore this pairing so much, but I do. Though it's rather obvious to me why I love this artwork so much. Your talent is immense!
They should go get drunk and fall over more often <3
I think Watson actually looks more drunk than Lestrade however

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to And-Reichenbach-Fell [2011-02-01 14:46:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

Haha, yeah, more drunken falling wouldn't be such a bad thing now, would it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DrIgnacious [2011-01-30 07:00:45 +0000 UTC]

I'd like being in Lestrade's position. Both in Drunkenness and physically. although I've been there in drunkenness.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to DrIgnacious [2011-02-01 14:51:51 +0000 UTC]

Mhmmm, who wouldn't like their own Watson to fall... ahem.. lean upon?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Devilry [2011-01-21 21:22:01 +0000 UTC]

Heeey, that's a nice pair! Lovely legs in this one! Some anatomy issues but with this motive I don't mind.. I love your Watson btw, he's so blonde and handsome! I'm gonna have to draw mine more like yours.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to Devilry [2011-02-01 14:28:07 +0000 UTC]

Aww thank you so much! That's quite the compliment for my Watson I adore the way you draw your Watson, he's so wonderfully Burke-ish you shouldn't change a thing.

I know something's off anatomically, but I just couldn't put my finger on what exactly it was So at some point I just gave up staring at it and decided to leave it as it is *sigh*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Devilry In reply to argwohn [2011-02-01 22:24:27 +0000 UTC]

Well your Watson is an absolute stunner so it's well-deserved!
Thank you! I'm floundering between Burke and Law and your Watson, I hope he doesn't look too unlike himself between frames..
I think the legs and arms are a bit long. But it's no major stuff, the loveliness is dominating.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zhooz [2011-01-19 07:37:19 +0000 UTC]

awww! a drunk Lestrade is a cute Lestrade

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to zhooz [2011-01-21 03:18:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sinamik [2011-01-19 02:46:46 +0000 UTC]

Cuuuuuute! <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to Sinamik [2011-01-19 03:30:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sherlockcode [2011-01-19 02:42:42 +0000 UTC]

very delicate. and lovely

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

bbculture In reply to sherlockcode [2011-01-19 03:33:07 +0000 UTC]

its just too blunt on gayness. There is an art to the gay way of drawing... but putting it so obvious is.....well too obvious

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Anglophile In reply to bbculture [2013-09-02 08:19:15 +0000 UTC]

Would you object if it were a woman and a man?Β  Would it be "too blunt on straightness" for you, then?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bbculture In reply to The-Anglophile [2013-09-03 21:33:01 +0000 UTC]

dont see why it would be any different

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Anglophile In reply to bbculture [2013-09-04 03:36:03 +0000 UTC]

Ok, so you're a prude.Β  Fair enough.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bbculture In reply to The-Anglophile [2013-09-04 05:01:47 +0000 UTC]

ahh, I see what you were trying to do.... get me to say one is worse then the other so you'd have an excuse to call me a homophobe or something lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Anglophile In reply to bbculture [2013-09-04 05:24:37 +0000 UTC]

Exactly.Β  Because if you had, then you would indeed have been a homophobe.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bbculture In reply to The-Anglophile [2013-09-09 23:43:02 +0000 UTC]

did you want to start an argument or something?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Anglophile In reply to bbculture [2013-09-10 14:02:39 +0000 UTC]

Yep.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

argwohn In reply to sherlockcode [2011-01-19 03:30:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bbculture [2011-01-19 02:29:10 +0000 UTC]

thats very.... awkward looking

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

argwohn In reply to bbculture [2011-01-19 03:30:54 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... do you mean anatomically? I'd like to learn from my mistakes, so if you could elaborate a little that would be nice^^.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0