HOME | DD
AAtheist — Isaac Asimov
Published: 2012-05-27 20:08:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 4223; Favourites: 67; Downloads: 67
Redirect to original
Description
If you like this kind of thing take a look at my facebook page at [link]Related content
Comments: 26
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So true! I "Pray" that Ben Carson NEVER becomes President! The things he says are absolutely insane! He woulde be George W. Bush on seroids.
On the Oregon Shooting he says that the hostages should've stood up and wrestled an armed individual thinking "He can't shoot everybody" That statement alone should disqualify him. It is nothing but taking a gamble with human lives thinking "Some will live, some will die, but hey, whay not take a chance!" Do You want someone like that with access to the Nuclear weapons button?! I know I don't!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If this is a generalization of all Christians, it is so very wrong. If he understood, that there are Christians who haven't lost an ounce of education, imagination and thinking because of their beliefs, good for him, although he sure made it hard for us to see that with this quote of him...
Is this what you consider as wisdom?
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Some examples of those unashamed ignorant people: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry, you are accusing people like Leonardo Da Vinci, and Johannes Kepler of being unashamed ignorant people?
I think you need to spend some time looking in the mirror. You certainly don't appear to have any intellectual honesty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I was sarcastic you smartoants
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah ok. How about people like Kirk Cameron? Ray Comfort? You see you have obviously completely missed the entire point of the quote.
People like Da Vinci and Kepler understood what EVIDENCE is. They actually changed their view depending on what the evidence gave them. People like Kirk Cameron are PROUD of the fact that they do not understand the arguments against them, and deliberately try to promote ignorance.
Saying that, it wouldn't surprise me to find that you agree with everything they say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, i don't know the Kirk Cameron / Ray Comfort you mentioned, but I know some evidence-operating creationists that argue their point with scientific facts.
Check this one: [link]
And please, keep your calm and don't degenerate into personal insults.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You expect me to go through an hour and a half long video to prove you wrong?
I do find it absolutely hilarious that you think Kent Hovind uses facts to back up his claims though.
Not even the young earth organisations like "Answers in Genesis" agree with him. Indeed AiG criticized Hovind for "persistently using discredited or false arguments" and said Hovind's claims are "self-refuting".
Hovind has actually tried telling people that "evolutionists believe humans came from rocks", which simply proves that he has absolutely NO understanding of evolution at all. None.
You are taking the word of a person that is CURRENTLY serving a ten year prison sentence for fraud, over the word of the entire accredited scientific community, and again you expect me to take you seriously? Really?
You know he was convicted of more than 50 federal counts right?
Kent Hovind is in fact the perfect example for the quote shown above, not only is he completely ignorant of everything he debates against, he is PROUD of that ignorance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I do find it absolutely hilarious that you dismiss Kent Hovind's factuality without investigating it. And he does use a lot of scientific, archeological facts.
This dismissiveness reveals that you don't really care for facts, or truth, or reality.
You care for your ideology that you associate with, and just defend it tooth and nails, like a good 12century catholic priest would.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Did you read what I put? I didn't even use atheist sources, I used full on Christian Creationists. And you still think he is factually accurate? I did "investigate it" I just didn't watch that particular video. I obviously know more about Hovind than you do, and frankly the fact that you think he is a rational and logical person is quite disturbing. I have seen some of his arguments, I even looked him up after finishing writing to you. He speaks in complete gibberish.
You say that I am the person who did no investigating, and yet you continue to prefer the word of someone that is CURRENTLY convicted of FRAUD, over the scientific community. Are you really that stupid?
I tell you what how about we play a game, why don't YOU watch it again, post the facts and "truth" for me here, and then I'll prove it either false or inapplicable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Certainly, anything you see can be put up, Can I enquire which is yours?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry, which is your facebook page?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoL sorry I thought you ran your own page
In reply to Ph Scott Ac on the Asimov picture [link] Tell him to research Spinoza's God a bit better.
Although, I get the feeling he got Einstein mixed up with Asimov
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
could be
I have 2 pages there, the art of deborah valentine and my normal fb page
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Good to know 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
