Comments: 59
4-X-S In reply to ??? [2014-05-15 05:31:37 +0000 UTC]
I guess I would say the same thing to a real artist
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zxcv1911 [2013-11-01 06:47:25 +0000 UTC]
ISBM = Interplanetary Ballistic Missile? A space version of an anti-ship missile or for the purpose of planetary bombardment?
P.S. I'm a Homeworld fan too. As well as a Taiidan Imperialist lover.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Lock-Mar [2013-08-23 02:17:21 +0000 UTC]
Oh thanks but this is far from finish
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chofni1996 [2013-08-21 10:17:18 +0000 UTC]
The blue one looks so cool.I like your style.keep it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Chofni1996 [2013-08-22 00:48:22 +0000 UTC]
thanks for the watch hey
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chofni1996 In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-22 10:59:09 +0000 UTC]
no problem,cheers and keep up the good work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Chofni1996 [2013-10-03 00:22:58 +0000 UTC]
I finished the rest care to take look?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KevKoe [2013-08-21 03:44:55 +0000 UTC]
maybe... try to tune down the lines, just make the outline bold but the inner lines thinner. I guess that would help on making the color stand out. Not a bad progress so far, keep experimenting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to KevKoe [2013-08-21 04:07:12 +0000 UTC]
Oh that line thing is ok I only do that for polish, I still have 2 more frame to draw, this is showing the design for both side.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KevKoe In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-21 06:18:47 +0000 UTC]
okay then, keep up the good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to KevKoe [2013-10-03 23:37:35 +0000 UTC]
This illustrations is now finished 4 pics if you care to check out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KevKoe In reply to 4-X-S [2013-10-04 03:07:16 +0000 UTC]
Hmm.. Sure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AshDarkside [2013-08-18 02:54:14 +0000 UTC]
I like the new one, but I feel that the cannons on the heavy cruiser became less fortified.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to AshDarkside [2013-08-18 04:09:25 +0000 UTC]
how come less fortified?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AshDarkside In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-18 13:13:33 +0000 UTC]
Well, being a physicist and all, I tend to look at designs from a practical point of view (something that darkslyer7raven hates about me). It is not like I have studies about space warfare, but from what I know and think:
A- The barrels of the cannons are now more exposed allowing attacks from front and up as well as passing above the ship from the side allows targeting both upper cannons. The first design has them properly covered.
B- The joining angle between the cannon and the wing (which is generally a weak point) is more exposed to the side allowing attackers to target both upper and lower cannons on the same side in one attack run. The older design requires a 45 degree approach path which makes it impossible to target more than one cannon.
C- The back of the cannons show a different plating pattern that indicate a possible weakness to attacks coming from the rare; continues or large plating has more fortified appearance than small segmented ones. The first one is uniformly shielded from all sides.
Also, acute angles (like the ones on the back side of the cannons) are to be avoided when designing spaceships since they amplify explosive damage (explosions on flat surfaces have 50% of their energy scattered away, the bigger the angle from 180 the less the damage; an angle of 60 degrees has only 27% of explosion energy scattered away.
This is just my opinion which you can ignore and still achieve success (not all people are as obsessive and nerdy as I)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to AshDarkside [2013-08-20 23:36:44 +0000 UTC]
Seriously he dislike your practical altitude? Ok all you mentioned where valid, but let's keep in mind that art is a business of communication, things have to be explicit when need to. The arrangement of this design change give a clearer illustration of what its about that add to the aggressiveness of the cannon. The viewer need something to see and the design of this ship need some highlights. Thanks for point them out but the turret isn't the only impractical thing about this design, if we go serious on that road the entire thing won't exist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
4-X-S In reply to KevKoe [2013-08-16 23:17:54 +0000 UTC]
Design something is not easy I guess.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KevKoe In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-17 01:07:28 +0000 UTC]
it is not. realizations of ideas are a long way and could be time consuming sometimes, but that's what it is, to put effort into your creations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to KevKoe [2013-08-18 04:11:22 +0000 UTC]
The final product looks simple, as the way thing should be. Im almost done with this one and expect the other takes just as much time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KevKoe In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-18 09:58:31 +0000 UTC]
will be waiting~
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to KevKoe [2013-08-21 02:52:30 +0000 UTC]
update will not disappoint
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Stealthflanker [2013-08-16 01:24:14 +0000 UTC]
Nice work as usual.
I really envy how easy you can get compliments....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Stealthflanker [2013-08-16 23:15:11 +0000 UTC]
Please don't overestimate me, Im not really great as you think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stealthflanker In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-18 17:25:07 +0000 UTC]
but seeing how easy you get compliments and faves..well i think you are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Stealthflanker [2013-08-19 14:40:32 +0000 UTC]
But Im not all that much when compared to some people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stealthflanker In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-20 23:38:10 +0000 UTC]
hmm maybe but you're many way better than me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Stealthflanker [2013-08-21 03:20:08 +0000 UTC]
may be that is true but life is more than just devient art
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stealthflanker In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-21 06:44:28 +0000 UTC]
unfortunately..i don't have anything shiny in life either...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
reneedicherri [2013-08-15 19:04:49 +0000 UTC]
Looks sweet! What program didja use?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to reneedicherri [2013-08-15 21:34:37 +0000 UTC]
Left sketch book Right Manga studio
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to reneedicherri [2013-08-16 23:16:58 +0000 UTC]
but still far from finish
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to reneedicherri [2013-08-21 02:52:45 +0000 UTC]
care to look at update?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
reneedicherri In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-21 13:10:34 +0000 UTC]
I thought the light red was an orange at first glance- rather than a shade of the red stripe.
Even so, I really like that as a scheme - grey, white, orange and red. I think the colors your picked are great, and the stripes work really well in highlighting the form of the ship.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to reneedicherri [2013-08-21 14:55:25 +0000 UTC]
About the orange red, I did not want the color scheme distract the form, I have to make it translated like the simple dark and light parts, so I made the light and dark part of red color be different from each other and more intone with the light and dark parts. Oh and the fact is I did not picked the color, it was an existing color scheme from the game itself, but I usual do like Red and white or blue and white colors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chofni1996 [2013-08-13 10:07:10 +0000 UTC]
Nice design.cheers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Chofni1996 [2013-08-13 14:56:36 +0000 UTC]
oh thanks its you again you are welcom
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chofni1996 In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-13 16:04:44 +0000 UTC]
Yes it's me ,I guess I like the designs very much,and no problem,cheers
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Chofni1996 [2013-08-14 23:35:48 +0000 UTC]
thanks man, still working on this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chofni1996 In reply to 4-X-S [2013-08-15 01:12:15 +0000 UTC]
No problem.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to Chofni1996 [2013-08-21 02:53:06 +0000 UTC]
update care to take look?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AshDarkside [2013-08-13 09:49:44 +0000 UTC]
I don't know much about coloring, but the design looks great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to AshDarkside [2013-08-13 14:57:06 +0000 UTC]
Thanks dud, I have to think how to make this even better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
h1r0Pr0tag [2013-08-13 05:46:30 +0000 UTC]
Very cool. Looking great
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
4-X-S In reply to h1r0Pr0tag [2013-08-13 14:57:18 +0000 UTC]
oh thanks you are welcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
darkslyer7raven [2013-08-13 04:28:03 +0000 UTC]
no one sucks at it, u just need to learn how to pick colors, understand color theory
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>