HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| beascissor

beascissor [1098959] [2004-09-13 17:56:14 +0000 UTC] "is cropping firmly." (Unknown)

# Statistics

Favourites: 1; Deviations: 10; Watchers: 29

Watching: 5; Pageviews: 5126; Comments Made: 338; Friends: 5

# Interests

Other Interests: /white paper/

# Comments

Comments: 69

psychedelicorchid [2007-05-16 16:09:33 +0000 UTC]

sweet thx for the ojz
please, take this grapefruit, i insist

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

astigmatic [2007-05-15 05:31:49 +0000 UTC]

+i thought i was dead.+

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TomaSoia [2006-01-21 12:31:43 +0000 UTC]

o papel branco serve para tanta coisa... não é?!... até no quarto de banh................ ah esqueçe mmm´
Β΄

)=#"(/$&

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

beascissor [2005-09-26 22:08:10 +0000 UTC]

olhem os rΓ©pteis, os rΓ©pteis, o
fogo.

(nem que durma agora me imagino triste)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kustr [2005-09-20 18:46:18 +0000 UTC]

as palavras so des-encardem via poema? a "caruncho" nΓ£o se liberta. Sim?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cristina-marilu [2005-09-12 16:34:39 +0000 UTC]

fantasmas nao sao fanatsmas...lo0ol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cristina-marilu [2005-09-12 16:23:43 +0000 UTC]

uma petit femme sonha quando nao tem fanatsmas debaixo dos lençois.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spinelessublime [2005-08-14 14:17:58 +0000 UTC]

you're back!!!
*ponces on you and returns your customized-for-ladies-only hug*
how have you been??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Orm-Embar [2005-08-12 12:01:53 +0000 UTC]

D. Scissor so vi os teus comments agora ,pa vers como tou desligado do mundo. Ohh o negro claro k n tem a ver com gotico Γ© mais um negro primordial o negro existencial.
Mas continuo a dizer que o poema Γ© mais acido do que negro...um acido que corroi a alma de quem le as tuas palavras

Ah ja soube que a sua amiga D.bee encontrou um zangao as minhas felicidades
Pensei k vcs (ela) estavam no gozo ***

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AxDude [2005-08-11 02:16:23 +0000 UTC]

Errrrr, eh... I sort of understood the comment you left on my homepage... I think it was to do with the Port poem I read a while ago... duh...

Anyway... thank you... hope you can enjoy my gallery as much as I enjoyed yours... or your clients... AAAAAAGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

musicobsessed [2005-08-07 18:21:49 +0000 UTC]

I shed like a cat, and I have four of them, so
it is quite hairy here.
Euthanasia is a load of crap, and I keep eating
when the phone rings, but I always rush
to answer it.

I don't know what's in my veins if it's not
me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

psychotic-dreamer [2005-08-06 15:59:04 +0000 UTC]

miss scissors,
thank you for your lovely comment on my page. now i have a better memory of your gorgeous poems, and can now watch you. this lady's memory can be quie ill and i'll apologize in advance.
tschues

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sotoxic [2005-08-03 18:33:48 +0000 UTC]

muito obrigado pela atenção, mas o prazer foi todo meu em ler o seu poema! de fato estÑ muito bem escrito! adorei! acho que escrever bem é uma das cosias que eu gostaria de aprender a fazer.. hehe eu tenho umas duas poesias nos meus scraps, se quiser olhar! ^^
abraços

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tragisch [2005-08-03 15:52:55 +0000 UTC]

x

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DeathSentinel [2005-07-29 13:26:46 +0000 UTC]

damn! i go like when i read something written by you...you write to damn well!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

A-Moonless-Night [2005-07-25 04:26:48 +0000 UTC]

Awesome writing!! I wish I were half as good as you!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

shortidiva19 [2005-07-25 00:08:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DreamForRequiem [2005-07-24 21:52:02 +0000 UTC]

Your gallery of writing is amazing. its fantastic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

musicobsessed [2005-06-24 19:26:54 +0000 UTC]

oh goodness me, it has
been far too long. please would you
write
a little
(?)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xxxxxx [2005-04-19 18:15:38 +0000 UTC]

:**********

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

somedrunkblackspoon [2005-04-16 05:27:18 +0000 UTC]

WRITE

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

somedrunkblackspoon [2005-03-22 06:43:30 +0000 UTC]

more
stepup

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xxxxxx [2005-01-27 03:50:09 +0000 UTC]

:*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

astigmatic [2005-01-22 03:48:01 +0000 UTC]

+i think miss scissor should be made such poems everywhere.+

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

somedrunkblackspoon [2004-12-30 00:21:49 +0000 UTC]

halo there

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theeaseofrain [2004-12-05 20:21:38 +0000 UTC]

i just don't understand where you are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theeaseofrain [2004-12-02 14:52:49 +0000 UTC]

i have missed you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

somedrunkblackspoon [2004-12-01 00:53:25 +0000 UTC]

hay lo

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Erin-Hess [2004-11-05 06:01:59 +0000 UTC]

'sup.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theeaseofrain [2004-11-04 07:16:04 +0000 UTC]

what are you up to, dear?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

choicreiw [2004-10-12 20:24:22 +0000 UTC]

check me out

it should be for adults only
delete
delete
delete

cut
cut
cut

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sumants [2004-10-10 17:39:55 +0000 UTC]

essentially, what you are saying is that you write something and let your reader find purpose and meaning in it. that means that you are refusing to take responsibility for a message, rather than have a poem that stands for something. sounds like a copout.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spinelessublime [2004-10-10 10:09:06 +0000 UTC]

I'd smother myself with your dirtiness - let alone pull my yellow robe over your waist...and better yet,
let you keep it.

It's always reminded me of your honeylemon hands

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sumants [2004-10-09 22:55:54 +0000 UTC]

punctuation is not a formality, but a necessity.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-10 17:18:06 +0000 UTC]

false!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumants In reply to xxxxxx [2004-10-10 17:32:32 +0000 UTC]

not really.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-10 17:47:25 +0000 UTC]

it's not necessarily a formality, though it can be. however it isn't a necessity either, it's a resource.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumants In reply to xxxxxx [2004-10-10 17:48:42 +0000 UTC]

it is all of the above, and most definitely a necessity for complete clarity of communication.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-10 18:44:57 +0000 UTC]

nuh-uh. "complete clarity of communication" is too wide a concept, sure, punctuation CAN help complete a message, but it is not a requirement.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumants In reply to xxxxxx [2004-10-11 12:24:00 +0000 UTC]

It is a requirement for complete clarity, which is not too broad, but the goal of any communication.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-11 16:41:04 +0000 UTC]

oh and don't even get me started on non-written forms of communication.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumants In reply to xxxxxx [2004-10-11 18:11:15 +0000 UTC]

i thought it was implicit that we were discussing written communications.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-11 18:16:35 +0000 UTC]

of course, i'm just stressing my point. when you read "table" and "table." aloud the difference becomes unexistent, now seeing it as written communication is translated to phonetical communication by our brains in order to give it coherence, punctuation becomes secondary: a resource.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-11 16:39:11 +0000 UTC]

table

table.

-

kids, dinner is served.

dinner is served kids

-

there is nothing worse than war, especially between brothers.

there is nothing worse than war
especially between brothers








exact same ideas?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumants In reply to xxxxxx [2004-10-11 18:15:25 +0000 UTC]

limited examples

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-11 18:18:16 +0000 UTC]

but effective. i told you: punctuation is not always necessary for communication to be complete. a single example, however limited, is enough.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumants In reply to xxxxxx [2004-10-11 18:30:07 +0000 UTC]

there's a common saying in philosophy and science - just because there are millions of examples, that doesn't mean a statement is true. all it takes is one counter-example to shoot it to hell.

what a nightmare.

what, a nightmare?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-11 18:41:44 +0000 UTC]

that's an example of necessary punctuation. i just gave you examples where punctuation isn't necessary. what does this mean? punctuation isn't ALWAYS a necessity. back to point one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumants In reply to xxxxxx [2004-10-11 18:53:24 +0000 UTC]

wrong again. your contention is that linebreaks constitute punctuation, and mine is that they do not.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

xxxxxx In reply to sumants [2004-10-11 19:00:56 +0000 UTC]

hahahaha

well then forget about the line breaks example, there are other two or three. just one is enough, you know. actually, let's forget about the whole thing, i mean it isn't hard to type up comments on a subject but typing up millions of them can get boring. and i'm bored.

plus, it's beascissor's page and i'm not sure she'll like having it turned into an argument about punctuation.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2


| Next =>