HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Theropsida
Theropsida
βοΈ
[12389068]
[2009-12-13 01:50:11 +0000 UTC]
"mammal-like reptiles"
(Unknown)
# Statistics
Favourites: 96; Deviations: 285; Watchers: 240
Watching: 12; Pageviews: 84618; Comments Made: 284; Friends: 12
# Comments
Comments: 91
Truly amazing artwork of animals sadly most people (at least that I know) never knew existed. Such fascinating creatures in their own right. Do you study and or work with prehistoric life? I can't really say I do, I'm just a hobbyist who always had the interest.
π: 0 β©: 1
I am an artist interested Β in paleoart
π: 0 β©: 0
WOW! Your gallery is impressive and very informative (assuming all sizes and shapes are based on scientific literature). Sadly disappoint how greatly smaller alot of them are. :I It is great to see a size comparison (finally) that allow for better prescriptive of things. Online article such as Wiki only list (if they do at all) only length size which does not really help you grasp actually size of a creature. So thank you for enlightening me better in natural history. :3
I have to ask do you know anyone else whom does accurate size comparison as you do, for other prehistoric animals.
π: 0 β©: 1
hello,thank you for the comment, the scales in my drawings are based on
Β images of the fossil remains that are shown in scientific articles, woefully most are found synapsidos small size.
Maybe these galleries you can helpΒ sinammonite.deviantart.com/
dibgd.deviantart.com/gallery/
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you so much for your help. :3 I hope they will so able to further understand permian era i.e. did Theropsida have complete basal fur, partial basal fur, or scaly. I hear some theories, but nothing solid yet about that.
π: 0 β©: 1
basal therapsidos probably would have like-rhinoceros skin with glands, scales much less likely
In cynodontos hair was possible but before them is not very likely,Β but still in discussion
π: 0 β©: 1
WOW! So cool, I hear some liking the scale/hair to a rat tail. Still I think what you said is far more likely.Β Either way, they are still awesome animals and illustration I have to said greatly helped to visualize them (more realistically).
π: 0 β©: 0
Hello
Dear therapsida
you have several drawing about kannemeyeria. you probably have sketch or photo about skull of every one of this species. I need to this skull sketchs. would you send me?
my Email:
keyvan_1878@yahoo.com
π: 0 β©: 0
Hey! Could you do me a favor? My character Felix is competing in a tournament called Winning is for Losers and he needs your vote. This is a competition where peoples' characters go up against each other for the title of champ! Click the link below and all you have to do is cast your vote! Nothing to it! Please vote for my guy! Voting ends in about 7 hours. Thanks for your help!
[link]
π: 0 β©: 0
I love your wonderful skill in drawing of Eoarctops vanderbyli. Would you like to make a similar picture about Cynognathus (with or wothout color) for me free?
if you like yo draw cynognathus, please contact for my Email... I send you a good article about this animal for you.
best wishes for New year 2012
your friend, Amin (from IRAN)]
keyvan_1878@yahoo.com
π: 0 β©: 1
You are really annoying...
π: 0 β©: 0
Awesome, good thing you draw prehistoric animals tha aren't really known.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hola, hice un comentario en ingles en la imagen del Ulemosaurus, pero asumo que asΓ me entenderΓ‘s mejor. Cuando cuando indicas la antiguedad de un animal y te refieres a los periodos de tiempo "Lower Permian", Middle permian" y "Upper Permian", te refieres e indicas a las Γ©pocas Cisuraliano, Guadalupiano y Lopingiano, respectivamente?
π: 0 β©: 2
pero basicamente si Middle Permian, or Guadalupian epoch Upper Permian (Late Permian) or Lopingian Lower / Early Permian or Cisuralian epoch
π: 0 β©: 0
Upper Permian (Late Permian) or Lopingian, Tatarian, or Zechstein, epoch [260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya - 251.0 Β± 0.4 Mya][6] Changhsingian (Changxingian) [253.8 Β± 0.7 Mya - 251.0 Β± 0.4 Mya]
Wuchiapingian (Wujiapingian) [260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya - 253.8 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Others: Waiitian (New Zealand) [260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya - 253.8 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Makabewan (New Zealand) [253.8 - 251.0 Β± 0.4 Mya]
Ochoan (North American) [260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya - 251.0 Β± 0.4 Mya]
Middle Permian, or Guadalupian epoch [270.6 Β± 0.7 - 260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya][7] Capitanian stage [265.8 Β± 0.7 - 260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Wordian stage [268.0 Β± 0.7 - 265.8 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Roadian stage [270.6 Β± 0.7 - 268.0 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Others: Kazanian or Maokovian (European) [270.6 Β± 0.7 - 260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya][8]
Braxtonian stage (New Zealand) [270.6 Β± 0.7 - 260.4 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Lower / Early Permian or Cisuralian epoch [299.0 Β± 0.8 - 270.6 Β± 0.7 Mya][9] Kungurian (Irenian / Filippovian / Leonard) stage [275.6 Β± 0.7 - 270.6 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Artinskian (Baigendzinian / Aktastinian) stage [284.4 Β± 0.7 - 275.6 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Sakmarian (Sterlitamakian / Tastubian / Leonard / Wolfcamp) stage [294.6 Β± 0.8 - 284.4 Β± 0.7 Mya]
Asselian (Krumaian / Uskalikian / Surenian / Wolfcamp) stage [299.0 Β± 0.8 - 294.6 Β± 0.8 Mya]
Others: Telfordian (New Zealand) [289 - 278]
Mangapirian (New Zealand) [278 - 270.6]
no especifico mucho sobre la escala geologica,l oq pongo es para darse una idea, quiaza despues rehaga las ilustraciones con mejor informacion
saludos
π: 0 β©: 0
Dear friend!
1- was Parotosuchus dangerous for Kannemeyeria? How about Cynognathus? How and Why?
2- How was reaction beteeen Parotosuchus and Erythrosuchus? How and Why?
3- Which one of them more dangerous ?How and Why?
a)Parotosuchus from Triassic
b) Eryops from Permian
Best wishes for you and your son, Amin(a biologist from IRAN)
π: 0 β©: 0
I love your prehistoric animals! So cool!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Fantastic gallery, I would watch you 50 times if I could! β₯
π: 0 β©: 1
Wouldn't be a better moniker reptile-like mammals?
Also, great reconstructions, good thing we are forgetting the sailed lizard image of Dimetrodon.
π: 0 β©: 1
thanks
the mammal-like reptiles moniker would be a good idea
but I like Therapsida
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>