HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Kunstkenner
# Statistics
Favourites: 8; Deviations: 2; Watchers: 35
Watching: 9; Pageviews: 16486; Comments Made: 4224; Friends: 9
# About me
Lover of art, curmudgeon when it comes to crap and art theft# Comments
Comments: 594
Footnoting [2016-11-07 13:54:59 +0000 UTC]
Here's some art theft for you to go after: denierman.deviantart.com/galle…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Footnoting [2016-05-19 22:10:32 +0000 UTC]
Same question as over three years ago . . . are you still around?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Footnoting [2013-04-11 00:32:39 +0000 UTC]
Don't see too much of you around here any more. What happened?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to Footnoting [2013-04-26 11:13:49 +0000 UTC]
I have been more active behind-the-scenes. Came to the conclusion that I was wasting my time trying to help some people on this website understand what they're doing is wrong. Even if they "get it" they generally go on doing it because they figure is a big enough website they'll never get caught. They may get by a few weeks, but they eventually get shut down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iKevinLee [2010-04-24 07:06:04 +0000 UTC]
i see that you're a really good artist critique, or even just a good DA rule enforcer. I am not very familiar with the rules of DA, and have had to delete a few images from my gallery for violating. could you give me some tips for images I should upload?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to iKevinLee [2010-04-25 01:32:13 +0000 UTC]
Considering you have submitted the images to the "Artistic Nude" category I'll first address that aspect. First off, there is nothing "artistic" about the images. They are poorly shot, obviously not thought out, and appear to be purely exhibitionist in nature. If you stand them side-by-side with other images in that gallery (or for that matter, images you have added to your favorites) you can clearly see they do not belong in that gallery. They warrant being removed on that basis alone, or at the very least being re-assigned to the "Scraps" category.
Now, to address content. Erections are not allowed on . Regardless of the artistic merit of such an image, they are not allowed. Such images are in violation of established policy and can be removed on that basis.
Tips... if you're serious about submitting artistic nude images (and not just trying to be an exhibitionist) than approach it seriously. Look at the work of people you admire on or elsewhere and work towards making your own images of such a quality. An out-of-focus, overlit image looking down your pants at your erect penis has little or no artistic merit, and certainly doesn't belong on .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
iKevinLee In reply to Kunstkenner [2010-04-25 03:38:37 +0000 UTC]
okay, thank you. I am serious on trying to submit artistic shots, but I'm new to photography. In the next few shots I decide to put up, I'll try to take your tips into consideration. It would help if i had a better camera to take pictures with, but I don't have that type of money. However, I will try and use better poses, and no longer use an erect penis, although I believe they look better than a flaccid one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rhosaucey [2010-03-29 21:59:55 +0000 UTC]
It seems an old friend of yours is back: [link]
After about an hour, the deviations have already been deleted. Methinks the deviant got caught too quickly this time. The sad part is that about 6+ people added them to their watchlist.
Ah, if only there were some kind of quality control for dA.
Anyway, figured I'd let you know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zgradis [2009-12-28 18:16:15 +0000 UTC]
[link] Just thought i'd let you know of another possible faker, if you know any links please share them with dA thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
szandor69 In reply to zgradis [2009-12-30 15:08:39 +0000 UTC]
ahh one more good samaritan licking someones ase
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
szandor69 [2009-12-28 16:52:35 +0000 UTC]
i think you have income from the tax you not working you stay 24 ours on da take you big ase out from your stoel and start a normal job sick mother fucker
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to szandor69 [2010-03-07 21:34:23 +0000 UTC]
So silly - and thankfully gone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
szandor69 [2009-12-28 16:13:51 +0000 UTC]
Kunst kenner me reet zal je bedoelen rot toch op man
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
szandor69 [2009-12-28 16:00:22 +0000 UTC]
Waar maak jij je druk om kunstkenner ben jij de sherlock holmes van deviant ga is een keertje flink neuken en scheer je baard dan voel je jezelf een stuk beter en anderen hier hebben geen last van je slappe gelul.listen everibody this gay is frigide and never had a girl in is life cheer up and dont be a serieus freak
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bikemerc [2009-12-10 17:02:31 +0000 UTC]
someone I know thinks that drawing from a picture is copyright infringement. I say no way. What is your opinion?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to bikemerc [2009-12-11 14:54:38 +0000 UTC]
If you're talking about a straight-up freehand drawing, then I would say no. However, if you're taking a photo and manipulating it in a program like Photoshop to make it look like a drawing, then that is definitely using someone else's work without permission. And there are people here on that do precisely that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bikemerc In reply to Kunstkenner [2009-12-14 13:10:34 +0000 UTC]
The is the prevalent view. My friend disagrees and thinks any change to a pic is artistic, like warhol's pics. However, photographers just grab or copy images, whereas illustrators create images, hehe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AlexLoneWolf [2009-09-13 12:32:36 +0000 UTC]
I see you have a few angry people on your page - what is it you do, though? Look around for wrong category photos?
No, I'm not being rude I'm just curious
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to AlexLoneWolf [2009-09-14 15:30:49 +0000 UTC]
Two areas:
- Mis-categorized images (miscats)
- Policy violations
What tends to draw the most ire is that of people who have posted images in violation of 's copyright policy. is not a photo-sharing website - it's only for posting original works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlexLoneWolf In reply to Kunstkenner [2009-09-15 00:47:57 +0000 UTC]
you're absolutely right on the copyright violation part, but I don't really understand the problem with posting photos that aren't very artistic. DA does have categories for snapshots and spontaneous portraits.
I guess it is a problem if that is ONLY what people post, but I hope you don't nag people who do 'share photos'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to AlexLoneWolf [2009-09-15 14:33:15 +0000 UTC]
No, not at all. When I draw attention to photo-sharing it is strictly in the sense of posting imagery that belongs to someone else. Original works are always welcome on .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlexLoneWolf In reply to Kunstkenner [2009-09-15 23:23:33 +0000 UTC]
ah I see now ^^
this is a good thing you're doing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
scotty-doesnt-know [2009-08-26 20:09:25 +0000 UTC]
what are you, the art gestappo/ righter of all wrongs?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to scotty-doesnt-know [2009-08-26 22:26:33 +0000 UTC]
What are you? The dimwit art thief who doesn't understand this is an art site, not a photo-sharing site?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Possemaster [2009-08-24 03:11:11 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the heads up! I removed that person from my follow list!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DarrenChapman [2009-08-20 17:17:49 +0000 UTC]
I wish you good luck with your efforts to expose those who seek credit for work which they have no right to do so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to DarrenChapman [2009-08-20 20:43:27 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much. It's bad enough when people see as a photo-sharing website. What's much worse is someone that posts images by other deviants and then attempts to pass it off as their own. Unfortunately, they often try to make me out as the bad guy because I (and most people on ) have an expectation that art theft and/or copyright infringement won't be tolerated. I always appreciate the positive vibes from people such as yourself!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bettelgeusse [2009-08-19 13:55:31 +0000 UTC]
Im new to this whole DA thing so Im just getting things sorted..
gimme a break!
-Becca
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to Bettelgeusse [2009-08-19 20:55:32 +0000 UTC]
Understood - just be aware that if the image doesn't conform to 's definition of what belongs in the "Artistic Nude" gallery your work will either be moved to another gallery or removed completely. Better you put it somewhere you deem appropriate than have an admin stick it where they want.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bettelgeusse In reply to Kunstkenner [2009-08-20 11:23:20 +0000 UTC]
Cool, thanks for the heads up friend
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kunstkenner In reply to mydeardarkness [2009-08-17 23:42:41 +0000 UTC]
Go the page with your deviation [link] and click on "Edit deviation." When the new page comes up where it says "Category" hit the button that reads "Choose..." Then change the category, hit "OK" and then go to the bottom of the page and hit the button that reads "Save changes." Then you're good to go.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kunstkenner In reply to krazyglueyourface [2009-08-15 22:40:35 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the positive vibes!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kunstkenner In reply to Fiestacen [2009-08-13 12:14:42 +0000 UTC]
Gee, aren't you the witty one? About what I'd expect from an art thief. Thanks for stopping by - I'll be reporting your gallery now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sirmomo [2009-08-12 23:33:34 +0000 UTC]
look at me now, I'm sure you'll be adding some of my work to your favs. Take care.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to sirmomo [2009-08-13 00:11:30 +0000 UTC]
Geez, you must be pretty desperate for pageviews.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sirmomo In reply to Kunstkenner [2009-08-13 00:56:23 +0000 UTC]
Look, I'm just a nice person and not a jerk like yourself. Go be ignorant on another site you fucking jerk. I wish I could delete you from Deviantart.com
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to SerenataPhotography [2009-08-12 13:58:14 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the positive vibes!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RobertJamesA [2009-08-05 15:55:10 +0000 UTC]
Whats it any of your buisiness if someone wants to show mature photos of themselves, you dont even have any art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kunstkenner In reply to RobertJamesA [2009-08-05 18:09:28 +0000 UTC]
I have no problem with people showing mature photos of themselves. What has a problem with is people stealing other people's artwork and passing it off as their own, which was the situation in this case.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>