HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| Amoxcalli

Amoxcalli ♂️ [10172932] [2009-04-06 19:13:39 +0000 UTC] "Lego, ergo sum" (Netherlands)

# Statistics

Favourites: 275; Deviations: 46; Watchers: 32

Watching: 13; Pageviews: 15312; Comments Made: 2353; Friends: 13

# Interests

Favorite visual artist: Gustav Klimt, Mark Rothko, Jackson Pollock
Favorite movies: Pulp Fiction
Favorite writers: Milan Kundera, JulΓ­o CortΓ‘zar, Italo Calvino
Other Interests: Literature

# About me

Current Residence: Netherlands
Favourite style of art: Abstract Expressionism
Personal Quote: A person is a person because he recognizes others as persons. - Archbishop Desmond Tutu

# Comments

Comments: 212

mreid973 [2011-06-16 02:36:59 +0000 UTC]

I know you aren't around much, but I just stumbled across this new journal that would benefit from some ant-related pieces.

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HugQueen [2010-12-30 18:25:54 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gimme-da-money [2010-10-11 02:38:14 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the fave!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to gimme-da-money [2010-10-11 15:55:14 +0000 UTC]

Welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheseKrimzonFlames [2010-08-05 22:34:39 +0000 UTC]

where
are
you
?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to TheseKrimzonFlames [2010-08-23 16:12:44 +0000 UTC]

on
holiday
but
I'm
back
now

also

WRITING!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheseKrimzonFlames In reply to Amoxcalli [2010-08-23 16:26:02 +0000 UTC]

ITS
ABOUT
TIME

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pwincessnaveera [2010-04-19 09:43:01 +0000 UTC]

Hope all's well dear!
And oh, :iconrandomhugplz: .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Pwincessnaveera [2010-05-24 18:51:35 +0000 UTC]

I'm back, after all those months.

Well, sort of back, anyway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pwincessnaveera In reply to Amoxcalli [2010-05-25 11:32:15 +0000 UTC]

Yeah i get that , i'm sort of 'on' DA too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flame-of-the-Phoenix [2009-12-21 01:58:15 +0000 UTC]

Hey!! Just wanted to stop by and thank you so much for the !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Flame-of-the-Phoenix [2009-12-21 10:42:38 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HarryZero [2009-12-21 01:41:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much for the



HarryZero

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to HarryZero [2009-12-21 10:42:19 +0000 UTC]

Thoroughly earned, I'd say! Congratulations!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HarryZero In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-12-21 12:50:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HugQueen [2009-12-20 19:35:33 +0000 UTC]

β™₯

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to HugQueen [2009-12-20 22:35:57 +0000 UTC]

Why thank you.

Just a kind random hug?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HugQueen In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-12-21 07:54:41 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome dear. <3

The best kind of hugs!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to HugQueen [2009-12-21 10:43:09 +0000 UTC]

Ohyesdefinitely!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HugQueen In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-12-21 14:25:44 +0000 UTC]

<3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

leoraigarath [2009-09-13 16:08:05 +0000 UTC]

Hi!

Just wanted to thank you for the watch, I really appreciate your support

- Omri
( `leoraigarath )

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to leoraigarath [2009-09-13 18:05:01 +0000 UTC]

Welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Friedemann [2009-09-05 00:53:55 +0000 UTC]

The ending to A Farewell to Arms humbled me. No wonder H. won the Nobel.

Nice reading list.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Friedemann [2009-09-05 08:19:41 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

And yes, I found the ending to A Farewell to Arms quite humbling myself too. They had a complete relationship at that point. It was very sad, and also a hurl back into the painfully realistic world.

One thing I found so good about A Farewell to Arms is that it doesn't allow you to dream away. At no point does Hemingway dream away, the story is always very real.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Friedemann In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-09-05 18:32:50 +0000 UTC]

His almost "existential" interior monologue, the sparsity of it, so much in so little words. I wish I'd known him. So many questions I could've asked...

Anyway, let me know how you enjoyed Ulysses once you tackled it. I'm only on page 40.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Friedemann [2009-09-05 21:33:08 +0000 UTC]

It's not so much the lack of words (his descriptions are rather lengthy, actually), but more the lack of 're-programmed emotion' (for lack of better word. ) in them. The connection you as a reader have with the main character is so very strong, it is amazing.

I will. Ulysses is not high on my priorities list, however, since it's pretty hard to find in my country. Our library doesn't have it, for instance. Naturally, the same goes for Finnegans' Wake and A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. I do really want to read those three books though. I've heard Joyce is a masterful writer.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Friedemann In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-09-05 21:43:53 +0000 UTC]

Haha yes, but what I meant to say by "so little words," is that he describes things without excessive synonyms and language. Such as, "Henry walked underneath the bridge towards yada yada," as opposed to, "Henry sauntered underneath the stony eaves of the cobblestone bridge, a rivulet trickling beneath his frayed boot soles..."

I hope you find some works by Joyce. He's a good one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Friedemann [2009-09-05 22:25:17 +0000 UTC]

Oh, in that case, yeah, definitely. He most certainly didn't use a thesaurus.

As a non-native speaker (and thus a somewhat less expansive vocabulary), I can really appreciate Hemingway's style. It was a welcome change after reading the far more intensive work of Anthony Burgess, for example.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

comicnerd635 [2009-08-23 16:21:09 +0000 UTC]

Sigh. Didn't proofread that .

More subtle than 1984. Ugh.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

comicnerd635 [2009-08-23 16:20:04 +0000 UTC]

Finished Brave New World, so here's that thing you asked for:

It's more subtle than Brave New World, in many ways more interesting. It doesn't have the same impact, but it does evoke quite a bit of thought, especially on the nature of rebellion

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to comicnerd635 [2009-08-23 16:48:35 +0000 UTC]

Sounds cool. I think I'll get it from the library, right after I've finished "A Farewell to Arms".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Suffer-None [2009-08-19 18:53:53 +0000 UTC]

hey, thx for the watch it is much appreciated.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Suffer-None [2009-08-19 19:53:55 +0000 UTC]

Likewise.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Suffer-None In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-08-26 23:20:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nova-Oriana [2009-08-16 07:57:37 +0000 UTC]

As always, thanks for the favs and your continued support

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Nova-Oriana [2009-08-16 19:21:58 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SapphireUchiha [2009-08-15 18:46:08 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ocnamacoyan [2009-08-15 13:46:20 +0000 UTC]

Being watcherless doesn't faze me.

have a hug back

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to Ocnamacoyan [2009-08-15 17:46:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

It's good you don't mind.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

my-cinderella-story [2009-08-13 18:13:45 +0000 UTC]

thanx for the watch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to my-cinderella-story [2009-08-13 18:56:34 +0000 UTC]

Likewise!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

my-cinderella-story In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-08-16 10:17:27 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EatingMyOwnFears [2009-08-13 13:54:25 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to EatingMyOwnFears [2009-08-13 16:59:56 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EatingMyOwnFears In reply to Amoxcalli [2009-08-13 22:56:40 +0000 UTC]

?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

heartofwings [2009-08-12 20:49:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the watch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to heartofwings [2009-08-12 21:01:27 +0000 UTC]

Likewise.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ResidentEvilVixen [2009-08-12 17:33:35 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the my dear!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amoxcalli In reply to ResidentEvilVixen [2009-08-12 17:37:11 +0000 UTC]

Likewise.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OutfernO [2009-08-12 06:21:42 +0000 UTC]

ThX a lot 4

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>